12.07.2015 Views

natural-products-in-plant-pest-management

natural-products-in-plant-pest-management

natural-products-in-plant-pest-management

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

160 H.N. Verma and V.K. BaranwalSeveral classes of the PR prote<strong>in</strong>s either possess direct antimicrobial activityor are closely related to classes of antimicrobial prote<strong>in</strong>s. These <strong>in</strong>clude β-1,3-glucanase, chit<strong>in</strong>ase, cyste<strong>in</strong>e-rich prote<strong>in</strong>s related to thaumat<strong>in</strong> and PR-1prote<strong>in</strong>s. An <strong>in</strong> vivo role <strong>in</strong> disease resistance has not been demonstrated forany of the PR prote<strong>in</strong>s. Alexander et al. (1993) demonstrated that constitutivehigh level expression of PR 1-a <strong>in</strong> transgenic tobacco results <strong>in</strong> tolerance to<strong>in</strong>fection by Peronospora tabac<strong>in</strong>a and Phytophthora parasitica var. nicot<strong>in</strong>ae. Onthe other hand, transgenic tobacco <strong>plant</strong>s express<strong>in</strong>g PR 1-b gene exhibitedno reduction <strong>in</strong> the severity of TMV symptoms (Cutt et al., 1989). Quite oftenSAR was not correlated with the <strong>in</strong>duction of PR prote<strong>in</strong>s (Kopp et al., 1989; Yeet al., 1989; Cohen et al., 1993; Kessman et al., 1994). Fraser found a poorcorrelation between the levels of PR 1-a prote<strong>in</strong> and also gave evidence forthe occurrence of PR prote<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> leaves of healthy tobacco <strong>plant</strong>s dur<strong>in</strong>gflower<strong>in</strong>g (Fraser, 1981; 1982). In conclusion, most of the evidence shows thatthe PR prote<strong>in</strong>s are closely associated with, and not necessarily responsiblefor, <strong>in</strong>duced resistance.7.5 Induced Resistance and the Role of Induced AntiviralProte<strong>in</strong>sVirus-<strong>in</strong>duced new antiviral prote<strong>in</strong> componentsAntiviral substances are formed <strong>in</strong> <strong>plant</strong>s respond<strong>in</strong>g hypersensitively tovirus <strong>in</strong>fection (Verma and Prasad, 1992) and have been recognized as phosphorylatedglycoprote<strong>in</strong>s (Faccioli and Capponi, 1983), glycoprote<strong>in</strong>s (Wier<strong>in</strong>gaand Dekker, 1987), RNA (Kimm<strong>in</strong>s, 1969), traumatic acid (Kato andMisawa, 1976), and prote<strong>in</strong>-like substances (Nienhaus and Babovic, 1978).Chadha and MacNeill (1969) found the formation of an antiviral pr<strong>in</strong>ciple <strong>in</strong>tomato <strong>plant</strong>s systemically <strong>in</strong>fected with TMV. These antiviral compoundsare not generally specific to the <strong>plant</strong>s. Thus, antiviral substances produced<strong>in</strong> capsicum <strong>plant</strong>s could reduce PVX <strong>in</strong>fection on Gomphrena globosa as wellas Solanum tuberosum (Nagaich and S<strong>in</strong>gh, 1970).The presence of an antiviral factor (AVF) was established <strong>in</strong> virus- <strong>in</strong>fected<strong>plant</strong>s which could decrease the number of local lesions produced by TMVand PVY (Sela and Applebaum, 1962). Partially purified AVF from TMV<strong>in</strong>fected N. glut<strong>in</strong>osa <strong>plant</strong>s was found to conta<strong>in</strong> both prote<strong>in</strong> and RNA (Selaet al., 1964). It was sensitive to ribonuclease and was resistant to proteolyticenzymes (Sela et al., 1966).Mozes et al. (1978) established that the purified AVF is a phosphorylatedglycoprote<strong>in</strong> of molecular weight 22 kDa on SDS gels. It is sensitive to pronaseunder conditions suitable for proteolysis of glycoprote<strong>in</strong>s. It rema<strong>in</strong>sactive after treatments with SDS and is stable at pH 2.0. It resembles <strong>in</strong>terferon<strong>in</strong> many of its properties (Mozes et al., 1978).Previously it was believed that TMV <strong>in</strong>fection was necessary for AVFproduction. But Edelbaum et al. (1983) found that TMV <strong>in</strong>fection could besubstituted by treatment with a mixture of Poly (I), Poly (C), cAMP

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!