12.07.2015 Views

natural-products-in-plant-pest-management

natural-products-in-plant-pest-management

natural-products-in-plant-pest-management

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

250 M. Santos et al.by biotic or abiotic agents’. Induced defence responses are regulated by anetwork of <strong>in</strong>terconnect<strong>in</strong>g signal transduction pathways <strong>in</strong> which thehormonal signals salicylic acid (SA), jasmonic acid (JA) and ethylene (ET)play a major role (Pieterse and Van Loon, 1999; Glazebrook, 2001), and otherhormones such as brass<strong>in</strong>osteroids and abscisic acid can also be <strong>in</strong>volved(Nakashita et al., 2003; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004). The phenotypic effects ofactivated defences are quite similar when the stimuli are biotic or abioticagents, but the biochemical and mechanistic changes appear to be subtlydifferent (Van Loon et al., 1998; Whipps, 2001). This has resulted <strong>in</strong> the term<strong>in</strong>duced systemic resistance (ISR) for bacterially <strong>in</strong>duced resistance andsystemic acquired resistance (SAR) for that <strong>in</strong>duced by abiotic agents ormicroorganisms that cause localized damage (Pieterse et al., 1996).SAR confers long-last<strong>in</strong>g protection aga<strong>in</strong>st a broad spectrum of microorganisms.SAR requires the signal molecule SA and is associated with theaccumulation of pathogenesis-related (PR) prote<strong>in</strong>s such as chit<strong>in</strong>ase, β-1-3-glucanases or prote<strong>in</strong>ase <strong>in</strong>hibitor, which are thought to contribute to resistance(Durrant and Dong, 2004). One of the major differences between SARand ISR is that PR prote<strong>in</strong>s are not universally associated with bacterially<strong>in</strong>duced resistance (ISR) (Hoffland et al., 1995) and SA is not always <strong>in</strong>volved<strong>in</strong> the expression of ISR.Several reports suggest that compost and compost-amended soil mayalter the resistance of a <strong>plant</strong> to disease. This was observed <strong>in</strong> airborne diseasessuch as powdery mildew of wheat and barley (Tränkner, 1992), earlyblight and bacterial spot of tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum) (Roe et al., 1993)or Anthracnose and Pythium root rot <strong>in</strong> cucumber (Cucumis sativus) (Zhanget al., 1996). A select few beneficial microorganisms of compost can <strong>in</strong>ducemechanisms of ISR. These microorganisms activate biochemical pathways <strong>in</strong><strong>plant</strong>s lead<strong>in</strong>g to ISR to root as well as some foliar diseases. This mechanismhelps expla<strong>in</strong> the often heard statement that <strong>plant</strong>s raised on healthy organicsoils are more able to resist diseases (Zhang et al., 1998). Plants produced <strong>in</strong> compost-amendedmixes harbour<strong>in</strong>g biocontrol agents that <strong>in</strong>duce systemic resistancehave higher concentrations of prote<strong>in</strong>s related to host defence mechanisms(Zhang et al., 1998). The activation of <strong>plant</strong> defence produces changes <strong>in</strong> cellwallcomposition, de novo production of PR prote<strong>in</strong>s such as chit<strong>in</strong>ases andglucanases, and synthesis of phytoalex<strong>in</strong>s, although further defensive compoundsare likely to exist but rema<strong>in</strong> to be identified (Heil and Bostock, 2002).Zhang et al. (1996, 1998) showed that composted p<strong>in</strong>e-bark-amendedpott<strong>in</strong>g mix provide Pythium root rot and Anthracnose control <strong>in</strong> cucumber by<strong>in</strong>duc<strong>in</strong>g systemic resistance (reported as SAR) utiliz<strong>in</strong>g split-root techniques.Experiments showed that when only some of the roots of a <strong>plant</strong> are<strong>in</strong> compost-amended soil, while the other roots are <strong>in</strong> diseased soil, the entire<strong>plant</strong> can still acquire resistance to the disease. On those <strong>plant</strong>s, the systemicprotection <strong>in</strong>duced by compost was accompanied by <strong>in</strong>creased peroxidaseactivity <strong>in</strong> leaf tissue. Acid peroxidase was previous reported as a putativemolecular marker of SAR <strong>in</strong> cucumber.ISR plays a role <strong>in</strong> the suppression of <strong>plant</strong> pathogens that colonize aerialand soil parts (Pharand et al., 2002). Krause et al. (2003) demonstrated that

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!