Prote<strong>in</strong>aceous and Polyketide Compounds <strong>in</strong> Plant Protection 133Terras, F.R.G., Torrekens, S., Van Leuven, F.,Osborn, R.W., Vanderleyden, J., Cammue,B.P. and Broekaert, W.F. (1993) A newfamily of basic cyste<strong>in</strong>e-rich <strong>plant</strong> antifungalprote<strong>in</strong>s from Brassicaceaespecies. FEBS 316, 233–240.Ukra<strong>in</strong>tseva, S.N. (2008) Potentiality of compact<strong>in</strong>us<strong>in</strong>g as the protection frame of<strong>plant</strong>s aga<strong>in</strong>st pathogenic organisms. In:Anniversary proceed<strong>in</strong>g digest ‘Fifty yearson guard of home food safty’, RAAS, ARRIP,B. Vyazyomy, Russia, 488–496.Valueva, T.A. and Mosolov, V.V. (2004) Role of<strong>in</strong>hibitors of proteolytic enzymes <strong>in</strong> <strong>plant</strong>defence aga<strong>in</strong>st phytopathogenic microorganisms.Biochemistry (Moscow) 69,1305–1309.Van Loon, L.C. (1985) Pathogenesis-relatedprote<strong>in</strong>s. Plant Molecular Biology 116,111–116.Van Loon, L.C., Pierpont, W.S., Boller, T. andConejero, V. (1994) Recommendationsfor nam<strong>in</strong>g <strong>plant</strong> pathogenesis-relatedprote<strong>in</strong>s. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter12, 245–264.Van Loon, L.C., Rep, M. and Pieterse, C.M.(2006) Significance of <strong>in</strong>ducible defenserelatedprote<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>fected <strong>plant</strong>s. AnnualReview of Phytopathology 44, 135–162.Van Loon, L.C. and Van Strien, E.A. (1999) Thefamilies of pathogenesis-related prote<strong>in</strong>s,their activities, and comparative analysisof PR-1 type prote<strong>in</strong>s. Physiological andMolecular Plant Pathology 55, 85–97.Varma, J. and Dubey, N.K. (1999) Perspectiveof botanical and microbial <strong>products</strong> as<strong>pest</strong>icides of tomorrow. Current Science76, 172–179.Viaud, M.C., Balhadere, P.V. and Talbot, N.J.A(2002) Magnaporthe grisea cyclophil<strong>in</strong> actsas a virulence determ<strong>in</strong>ant dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>plant</strong><strong>in</strong>fection. The Plant Cell 14, 917–930.Vila L., Lacadena V., Fontanet P., Mart<strong>in</strong>ez A.and SanSegundo B. (2001) A prote<strong>in</strong> fromthe mold Aspergillus giganteus is a potent<strong>in</strong>hibitor of fungal <strong>plant</strong> pathogens.Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 14,1327–1331.Wei, Z.M. and Beer, S.V. (1996) Harp<strong>in</strong> fromErw<strong>in</strong>ia amylovora <strong>in</strong>duces <strong>plant</strong> resistance.Acta Horticulturae 411, 223–225.Wong, J.H. and Ng, T.B. (2005) Sesqu<strong>in</strong>, apotent defens<strong>in</strong>-like antimicrobial peptidefrom ground beans with <strong>in</strong>hibitoryactivities toward tumor cells and HIV-1reverse transcriptase. Peptides 26,1120–1126.Wong, J.H., Zhang, X.Q., Wang, H.X. andNg, T.B. (2006) A mitogenic defens<strong>in</strong>from white cloud beans (Phaseolusvulgaris). Peptides 27, 2075–2081.Wu, G.S., Shortt, B.J., Lawrence, E.B. , Leon, J.,Fitzsimmons, K.C., Lev<strong>in</strong>e, E.B., Rask<strong>in</strong>,I. and Shah, D.M. (1997) Activation ofhost defense mechanisms by elevatedproduction of H 2O 2<strong>in</strong> transgenic <strong>plant</strong>s.Plant Physiology 115, 427–435.Xiao-Yan S.S, Q<strong>in</strong>g-Tao S., Shu-Tao X., Xiu-LanC., Cai-Yun S. and Yu-Zhong Z. (2006)Broad-spectrum antimicrobial activityand high stability of trichokon<strong>in</strong>s fromTrichoderma kon<strong>in</strong>gii SMF2 aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>plant</strong>pathogens. FEMS Microbiological Letters260, 119–125.Zasloff, M. (2002) Antimicrobial peptides ofmulticellular organisms. Nature 415,389–395.Zhukov, Yu.N., Vavilova, N.A., Osipova, T.I.,Khurs, E.N., Dzavakhiya V.G. and Khomutov,R.M. (2004) Fungicidal activity ofphosph<strong>in</strong>ic analogues of am<strong>in</strong>o acids<strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> methion<strong>in</strong>e metabolism.Doklady Biochemistry and Biophysics 397,210–212.
6 Natural Products asAllelochemicals <strong>in</strong> PestManagementROMAN PAVELACrop Research Institute, Prague, Czech RepublicAbstractAllelochemicals are one of the most plentiful groups of substances <strong>in</strong> the vegetablek<strong>in</strong>gdom. The significance and use of these chemicals <strong>in</strong> nature are as varied as allelochemicalsthemselves. Allelochemicals also <strong>in</strong>clude a group of substances called allomones.These substances are created by <strong>plant</strong>s as a defence aga<strong>in</strong>st phytophagous<strong>in</strong>sects and comprise repellents, anti-ovipositants and antifeedants. This group of<strong>plant</strong> metabolites can be of practical use <strong>in</strong> many areas of human activity. This chapterdeals with possibilities of us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>plant</strong> extracts conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g allomone <strong>in</strong> the protectionof <strong>plant</strong>s aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>pest</strong>s. Substances with antifeedant effects, <strong>in</strong> particular, appear to behighly promis<strong>in</strong>g for the development of new, environmentally safe <strong>in</strong>secticides. In thischapter, we have therefore focused mostly on this group of substances and criticallyconsidered the perspective of us<strong>in</strong>g antifeedant substances <strong>in</strong> <strong>plant</strong> protection.6.1 IntroductionPlants have developed alongside <strong>in</strong>sects s<strong>in</strong>ce the very beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of theirexistence. Thanks to their common history, very fragile mutual relationshipshave formed between <strong>in</strong>dividual <strong>plant</strong> and <strong>in</strong>sect species, which we aretry<strong>in</strong>g to clarify today us<strong>in</strong>g scientific approaches. On the one hand, <strong>plant</strong>sutilize <strong>in</strong>sects, especially as their poll<strong>in</strong>ators, and on the other, <strong>in</strong>sects use<strong>plant</strong>s as the source of their food. Therefore, for balanced mutual <strong>in</strong>teractionsbetween <strong>plant</strong>s and <strong>in</strong>sects, communication and mutual <strong>in</strong>fluence must existbetween them to prevent uncontrolled excessive reproduction of any species<strong>in</strong> order to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> equilibrium <strong>in</strong> the ecosystem with maximum possiblebiodiversity. Plants thus created many strategies <strong>in</strong> the course of theirco-evolution to protect themselves efficiently aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>in</strong>sect <strong>pest</strong>s, and the<strong>in</strong>sects try to circumvent such strategies. Understand<strong>in</strong>g their mutual relationshipshelps us not only to understand the world around us but alsoprovides <strong>in</strong>formation that may lead to a practical use.© CAB International 2011. Natural Products <strong>in</strong> Plant Pest Management134 (ed. N.K. Dubey)