12.07.2015 Views

Colletotrichum: complex species or species ... - CBS - KNAW

Colletotrichum: complex species or species ... - CBS - KNAW

Colletotrichum: complex species or species ... - CBS - KNAW

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The <strong>Colletotrichum</strong> acutatum <strong>species</strong> <strong>complex</strong>Asexual m<strong>or</strong>ph on Anthriscus stem. Conidiomata acervular,only f<strong>or</strong>med after ca. 14 d, the conidioph<strong>or</strong>es, f<strong>or</strong>med on a cushionof pale brown angular cells, 3.5–8.5 µm diam. Setae not observed.Conidioph<strong>or</strong>es hyaline, smooth-walled, simple <strong>or</strong> septate andbranched, to 30 µm long. Conidiogenous cells hyaline, smoothwalled,cylindrical, 11–18 × 2.5–4 µm, opening 1–2 µm diam,collarette 0.5 µm long, periclinal thickening visible. Conidia hyaline,smooth-walled, aseptate, straight, cylindrical with one end roundand one end slightly acute to truncate, (14.5–)16–18.5(–20) ×(4–)4.5–5(–5.5) µm, mean ± SD = 17.1 ± 1.3 × 4.9 ± 0.3 µm,L/W ratio = 3.5, conidia of strain <strong>CBS</strong> 115.14 smaller, measuring(9.5–)11.5–16(–18.5) × (2.5–)3–4(–4.5) µm, mean ± SD = 14.0 ±2.3 × 3.3 ± 0.4 µm, L/W ratio = 4.2.Culture characteristics: Colonies on SNA flat with entire margin,hyaline, filter paper rose to iron-grey, with felty to woolly, whiteto olivaceous grey aerial mycelium on Anthriscus stem and filterpaper, reverse same colours; growth rate 18–24 mm in 7 d (32.5–36 mm in 10 d). Colonies on OA flat with entire margin; surfacepale amber, ochraceous to apricot, almost entirely covered by feltyto floccose-felty, white, pale luteous to very pale olivaceous aerialmycelium, reverse rosy buff, ochraceous, cinnamon to buff; growthrate 21–27 mm in 7 d (34–37.5 mm in 10 d). Conidia in mass palesalmon.Material examined: Germany, Hessen, near Oestrich (Hostrichia), on dry branchesof Salix fragilis, collection date and collect<strong>or</strong> unknown (Fuckel, Fungi Rhenani no.913 (G holotype [not seen], K(M) isotype of Sphaeria salicis). Netherlands, Z.-Flevoland, Salix f<strong>or</strong>est near Blocq van Kuffeler, from leaf spot of Salix sp., 11 Sep.1994, H.A. van der Aa, (<strong>CBS</strong> H-20730 epitype of Sphaeria salicis, here designated,culture ex-epitype <strong>CBS</strong> 607.94). Sweden, Uppland, Uppsala, Bondkyrka parish,Nåsten f<strong>or</strong>est, between Lurbo bridge and Predikstolen cliff, 22 Jun. 1946, S.Lundell (Fungi exsiccati Suecici, praesertim Upsalienses no. 3613a; K(M) 85441),stated by L. Holm to “agree perfectly” with the type of Sphaeria salicis. Germany,Berlin, Dahlem, from fruit of Solanum lycopersicum, collection date and collect<strong>or</strong>unknown (deposited in <strong>CBS</strong> collection Feb. 1914 by F. Krüger), culture ex-syntypeof Glomerella lycopersici <strong>CBS</strong> 115.14. Japan, Sapp<strong>or</strong>o, on stems of Salix purpurea,20 Oct. 1920, Fukushi (K(M) 110218), authentic and possible type material ofPhysalosp<strong>or</strong>a miyabeana, sent to Kew via R.M. Nattrass. USA, Ithaca, New Y<strong>or</strong>kState College of Agriculture, in office, Plant Sci. Bldg, C<strong>or</strong>nell Univ., from anthracnoseand dieback of Araucaria excelsa, 22 Apr. 1983, J. E. Carol, culture <strong>CBS</strong> 465.83.Notes: <strong>Colletotrichum</strong> salicis is unusual among <strong>Colletotrichum</strong><strong>species</strong> in the prominence of sexual structures relative to asexualstructures; it is one of the few <strong>species</strong> to produce fertile ascomatain culture. The ascomata are not infrequently encountered on deadand dying, weakly lignified tissues including young stems, bractsand flower/fruit stalks of Salix <strong>species</strong>. A lack of distinctive featureshas caused this <strong>species</strong> to be described as new several times.<strong>Colletotrichum</strong> salicis was first described as Sphaeria salicis byFuckel (1870), based on an exsiccatum in his series Fungi Rhenaniissued in 1864. Its label ascribed the <strong>species</strong> name to Auerswald,but no description was provided and Auerswald was not creditedwith the name when it was subsequently validly published.Sphaeria salicis has been transferred to a range of differentsexual m<strong>or</strong>ph genera. In 1954, it was moved to the rather confusedgenus Plectosphaera (von Arx & Müller 1954, Cannon 1991) andlater, in 2000, to Glomerella (Holm & Ryman 2000).Phyllach<strong>or</strong>a amenti was described from Salix reticulata inDovre, N<strong>or</strong>way by Rostrup (1891). Von Arx & Müller (1954)transferred the <strong>species</strong> to Glomerella (apparently not noticing thesimilarities with Plectosphaera salicis). We have not seen Rostrup’stype, but his description and that of von Arx & Müller are highlyreminiscent of C. salicis and we are confident of the synonymy.Rostrup also described a putative asexual m<strong>or</strong>ph of Phyllach<strong>or</strong>aamenti with filif<strong>or</strong>m septate conidia, 35–45 × 1 µm in size, f<strong>or</strong>med inpycnidia. This is most likely to be an accompanying <strong>species</strong> ratherthan a genetically linked m<strong>or</strong>ph. It may be Sept<strong>or</strong>ia didyma.Physalosp<strong>or</strong>a miyabeana was described from Salix purpureavar. angustifolia in Japan by Fukushi (1921), and combined intoGlomerella by von Arx (1957) as Glomerella miyabeana. Thepathology of this fungus was described in detail by Nattrass(1928) based on British collections from Salix viminalis. He notedthat the <strong>species</strong> showed similarities to Physalosp<strong>or</strong>a salicis. Heidentified his collections as P. miyabeana due to the presence ofa Gloeosp<strong>or</strong>ium (i.e. <strong>Colletotrichum</strong>) asexual m<strong>or</strong>ph as noted byFukushi (1921), and considered that the <strong>species</strong> was m<strong>or</strong>e closelyrelated to Glomerella than to Physalosp<strong>or</strong>a. Further inf<strong>or</strong>mation onpathology has been contributed by Butin (1960).Glomerella lycopersici was described from a mummified fruit ofSolanum lycopersicum (= Lycopersicon esculentum) in Germany.The ex-syntype strain <strong>CBS</strong> 115.14 hardly sp<strong>or</strong>ulates and did notf<strong>or</strong>m a sexual m<strong>or</strong>ph in culture, but molecular data confirm thesynonymy. The ascosp<strong>or</strong>e measurements (15–17.3 × 5.8–6.9 µm)in the <strong>or</strong>iginal description by Krüger (1913) differ somewhat fromour measurements, and those of conidia differ even m<strong>or</strong>e (20–22 ×4.7–6.9 µm) from our own; the discrepancy could be due to the useof different growth media. However, the shapes of the ascosp<strong>or</strong>es(one side often nearly straight and one side convex <strong>or</strong> irregularlybiconvex) and of the conidia (often clavate) c<strong>or</strong>respond to those ofstrain <strong>CBS</strong> 607.94. A further synonym may be Guignardia salicina(syn. Physalosp<strong>or</strong>a salicina, Glomerella salicina), but we havenot been able to source the <strong>or</strong>iginal description <strong>or</strong> examine typematerial.<strong>Colletotrichum</strong> lucidae was described on living leaves Salixlucida in Wisconsin, USA by Greene (1956). It f<strong>or</strong>ms obtusecylindrical conidia (13–19 × 4–6.5 µm) and 1–2-septate setae(50–65 × 4–5 µm). It might also be a synonym of C. salicis. Greene(1964) also found the <strong>species</strong> a few years later on S. pyrifolia. Thestrains we studied did not f<strong>or</strong>m setae, but if C. lucidae is conspecific,it will just be a later synonym of C. salicis.Johnston & Jones (1997) found that C. salicis (as Ga.miyabeana) had a close genetic affinity to C. acutatum. Vinnere(2004) regarded Ga. miyabeana as the sexual m<strong>or</strong>ph of one of thebiological groups within C. acutatum s. lat., and suggested thatit should be recognised as a separate <strong>species</strong>. This is confirmedby our study. <strong>Colletotrichum</strong> salicis f<strong>or</strong>ms a sister clade to a cladef<strong>or</strong>med by C. ph<strong>or</strong>mii, C. rhombif<strong>or</strong>me, C. acerbum, C. australe andC. kingh<strong>or</strong>nii.Fruit-inhabiting strains of C. salicis (as Ga. miyabeana) areknown to be homothallic (Johnston & Jones 1997), and thosefrom Acer platanoides in USA (which also belong here), werealso determined as homothallic by LoBuglio & Pfister (2008). Inthis study, only strains of C. salicis and C. rhombif<strong>or</strong>me f<strong>or</strong>medsexual m<strong>or</strong>phs in culture. The ascosp<strong>or</strong>es of the two <strong>species</strong> arethe same size, but differ in shape. Conidia of C. salicis f<strong>or</strong>med onSNA are smaller than those of C. rhombif<strong>or</strong>me, and those f<strong>or</strong>medon Anthriscus stem are unif<strong>or</strong>mly cylindrical, with no ellipsoidal<strong>or</strong> limonif<strong>or</strong>m conidia as found in C. rhombif<strong>or</strong>me. Other closelyrelated <strong>species</strong> i.e. C. acerbum, C. australe, C. kingh<strong>or</strong>nii and C.ph<strong>or</strong>mii f<strong>or</strong>m conidia on SNA, measuring on average 17.9 × 4.7µm, 17 × 4.4 µm and 18.3 × 3.8 µm and 23 × 4.6 µm respectively,that are larger than those of C. salicis, measuring 13.0 × 4.0 µm.Acc<strong>or</strong>ding to our study, C. salicis is not restricted to a singlehost genus but seems to have a preference f<strong>or</strong> woody hosts (Acer,Araucaria, Malus, Populus, Pyrus and especially Salix). Acc<strong>or</strong>dingto Farr & Rossman (2012), Glomerella amenti has been rec<strong>or</strong>dedwww.studiesinmycology.<strong>or</strong>g99

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!