15.08.2015 Views

Jesus in the Talmud

4IAjqbGxC

4IAjqbGxC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Jesus</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Talmud</strong> 97reached <strong>the</strong>m through some hidden channels; ra<strong>the</strong>r, as I could show <strong>in</strong>detail, it is <strong>the</strong> New Testament (almost exclusively <strong>the</strong> four Gospels) as weknow it or <strong>in</strong> a form similar to <strong>the</strong> one we have today. Hence, <strong>the</strong> rabb<strong>in</strong>icstories <strong>in</strong> most cases are a retell<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> New Testament narrative, a literaryanswer to a literary text. 3 Let us now summarize <strong>the</strong> major motifsthat appear <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> rabb<strong>in</strong>ic sources and that <strong>the</strong> rabbis obviously regardedas representative of <strong>the</strong> Christian sect and its founder <strong>Jesus</strong>.SexThe most prom<strong>in</strong>ent characteristic that dom<strong>in</strong>ates quite a number of <strong>the</strong>rabb<strong>in</strong>ic stories is sex, more precisely sexual promiscuity. Sexual promiscuityis already presented as <strong>the</strong> foundation story of <strong>the</strong> Christian sect: itshero is <strong>the</strong> son of a certa<strong>in</strong> Miriam and her lover Pandera—a mamzer,born out of wedlock (because his mo<strong>the</strong>r was married to a certa<strong>in</strong> Stadaor Pappos b. Yehuda). The legal status of <strong>the</strong> bastard is def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>Bible as such: “No bastard (mamzer) shall be admitted <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> congregationof <strong>the</strong> Lord; even to <strong>the</strong> tenth generation shall he not be admitted<strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> congregation of <strong>the</strong> Lord” (Deut. 23:3), a fate that he shares with<strong>the</strong> eunuchs and <strong>the</strong> Ammonites and Moabites: he is excluded from <strong>the</strong>congregation of Israel for <strong>the</strong> foreseeable future. 4 His adulterous mo<strong>the</strong>rdeserves—accord<strong>in</strong>g to biblical and rabb<strong>in</strong>ical law—<strong>the</strong> death penalty ofston<strong>in</strong>g or strangulation, as <strong>the</strong> Bible decrees for our case, <strong>the</strong> adultery betweena married woman and her lover: “If a man is found ly<strong>in</strong>g with ano<strong>the</strong>rman’s wife, both of <strong>the</strong>m shall die, <strong>the</strong> man who lay with <strong>the</strong>woman as well as <strong>the</strong> woman; so you shall purge <strong>the</strong> evil from Israel”(Deut. 22:22). 5 Hence, under strict application of biblical law, <strong>Jesus</strong>’mo<strong>the</strong>r should have been stoned. The <strong>Talmud</strong> does not seem to be <strong>in</strong>terested<strong>in</strong> her subsequent fate, but her son does fall under <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r provisionof <strong>the</strong> Mishna (idolatry) and will <strong>in</strong>deed be stoned. So <strong>in</strong> a highlyironical sense, <strong>Jesus</strong>’ birth from an adulterous mo<strong>the</strong>r po<strong>in</strong>ts to his own violentdeath.As we have seen, this story of <strong>the</strong> adulterous mo<strong>the</strong>r and her bastard sonis <strong>the</strong> perfect counternarrative to <strong>the</strong> New Testament’s claim that <strong>Jesus</strong> was

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!