15.08.2015 Views

Jesus in the Talmud

4IAjqbGxC

4IAjqbGxC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

28 Chapter 2husband can present aga<strong>in</strong>st his wife (like spoil<strong>in</strong>g his d<strong>in</strong>ner), but anyth<strong>in</strong>gthat has to do with fornication.This sexual context becomes even clearer if we take <strong>in</strong>to considerationthat <strong>the</strong> Hebrew word for <strong>the</strong> spoiled “dish” (tavshil) acquires <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Bavlialso <strong>the</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>in</strong>tercourse. Thus <strong>the</strong> <strong>Talmud</strong> relates of Rav Kahana(a Babylonian amora of <strong>the</strong> second generation and student of Rav, whowent to Palest<strong>in</strong>e):Rav Kahana once went <strong>in</strong> and hid under Rav’s bed. He heard himchatt<strong>in</strong>g (with his wife) and jok<strong>in</strong>g and do<strong>in</strong>g what he required (hav<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>tercourse with her). He (Rav Kahana) said to him (Rav): “Onewould th<strong>in</strong>k that Abba’s 9 mouth had never sipped <strong>the</strong> dish before(śaref tavshila).” He (Rav) said to him (R. Kahana): “Kahana, are youhere? Get out because this is not what one is supposed to do!” He (RavKahana) replied: “It is a matter of Torah, and I require to learn!” 10Here <strong>the</strong> phrase “to sip/swallow <strong>the</strong> dish” undoubtedly refers to perform<strong>in</strong>gsexual <strong>in</strong>tercourse. Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, if a woman “spoils his [her husband’s]dish,” she does someth<strong>in</strong>g that prohibits him from hav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tercoursewith her—most likely some sexual misconduct that compromisesher as well as his reputation. In <strong>the</strong> case of our son or disciple it is <strong>the</strong> manwho spoils his dish, mean<strong>in</strong>g that he does someth<strong>in</strong>g that prohibits herfrom hav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tercourse with him—aga<strong>in</strong> presumably some sexual misconductthat compromises his as well as her reputation. The effect of thismisconduct on <strong>the</strong> part of <strong>the</strong> son/disciple is <strong>in</strong>tensified by <strong>the</strong> fact that hedoes so <strong>in</strong> public, mak<strong>in</strong>g it impossible for her to ignore it.Seen with<strong>in</strong> this wider context <strong>the</strong> message of Rav Hisda’s exegesis of<strong>the</strong> Psalm verse seems to be: <strong>the</strong> worst plague is a son or disciple who publiclyleads a licentious life by which he compromises himself and his poorwife. It is hardly by co<strong>in</strong>cidence that this <strong>in</strong>terpretation comes from <strong>the</strong>same Rav Hisda who told us that <strong>Jesus</strong>’ mo<strong>the</strong>r had a husband as well as alover and that <strong>Jesus</strong> was <strong>the</strong> son of her lover. Now we learn: this <strong>Jesus</strong> isn’tany better than his mo<strong>the</strong>r—it’s <strong>in</strong> his blood. He is so spoiled that he hasbecome <strong>the</strong> proverbial son or disciple who is unfaithful to his wife and adisgrace to his parents or his teachers. 11 This is quite an unexpected turn<strong>in</strong> <strong>Jesus</strong>’ life that goes far beyond <strong>the</strong> New Testament narrative—unless

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!