Jesus in the Talmud
4IAjqbGxC
4IAjqbGxC
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
4 Introduction1699 dissertation, submitted at <strong>the</strong> University of Altdorf by <strong>the</strong> ProtestantOrientalist Rudolf Mart<strong>in</strong> Meelführer, <strong>Jesus</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Talmud</strong>e (“<strong>Jesus</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><strong>Talmud</strong>”). 8 Unlike Wagenseil, who was highly <strong>in</strong>fluential and widelyread, his student Meelführer was almost immediately forgotten; both,however, were surpassed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>fluence by Johann Andreas Eisenmenger’sGerman work <strong>in</strong> two volumes, Entdecktes Judenthum (“JudaismUnmasked”), which would become—until well <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> modern period—a major source for anti-Semitic attacks aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> Jews. 9Whereas <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> early modern period <strong>the</strong> “<strong>Jesus</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Talmud</strong>” paradigmserved almost solely as an <strong>in</strong>exhaustible source for anti-Jewish sentiments,<strong>the</strong> subject ga<strong>in</strong>ed more serious and critical recognition <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>n<strong>in</strong>eteenth and twentieth centuries. Among <strong>the</strong> extensive relevant literaturea few authors deserve special attention: 10 Samuel Krauss presented <strong>the</strong>first scholarly analysis of <strong>the</strong> Toledot Yeshu, based on an edition and comprehensiveanalysis of <strong>the</strong> variant versions of <strong>the</strong> text (1902), which eventoday rema<strong>in</strong>s <strong>the</strong> authoritative treatment of <strong>the</strong> subject. 11 A year later, <strong>in</strong>1903, Travers Herford published his Christianity <strong>in</strong> <strong>Talmud</strong> and Midrash, 12which would become <strong>the</strong> standard book about Christianity and <strong>Jesus</strong> <strong>in</strong>rabb<strong>in</strong>ic sources, particularly <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> English-speak<strong>in</strong>g world. Herford’s approachcan be called maximalistic <strong>in</strong> every regard: not only are <strong>the</strong> manypassages that mention <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>im (“heretics” <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> broadest sense of <strong>the</strong>term) deal<strong>in</strong>g almost without exception with Christians, but he also concludesthat almost all <strong>the</strong> passages <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> rabb<strong>in</strong>ic literature that have beenremotely connected with <strong>Jesus</strong> and his life <strong>in</strong>deed refer to <strong>Jesus</strong>. The factthat he is ra<strong>the</strong>r restra<strong>in</strong>ed with regard to <strong>the</strong> value of <strong>the</strong> rabb<strong>in</strong>ic sourcesas evidence for <strong>the</strong> attempt to reconstruct <strong>the</strong> historical <strong>Jesus</strong> 13 does not detractfrom his generally maximalistic and quite naive approach.The first attempt to exam<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> relevant rabb<strong>in</strong>ic passages about <strong>Jesus</strong>and Christianity critically and to provide a text critical edition and translationwas made <strong>in</strong> 1910 by <strong>the</strong> Christian German scholar Hermann L.Strack (<strong>the</strong> same Strack who ga<strong>in</strong>ed enormous reputation through hisfamous Introduction to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Talmud</strong> and Midrash) 14 <strong>in</strong> his 1910 monograph<strong>Jesus</strong>, die Häretiker und die Christen nach den ältesten jüdischen Angaben. 15Strack set a sober tone, not only with regard to <strong>the</strong> historical value of <strong>the</strong>rabb<strong>in</strong>ic evidence but also with regard to <strong>the</strong> number of <strong>the</strong> relevant passages,that was to become a major trend particularly <strong>in</strong> German-language