15.08.2015 Views

Jesus in the Talmud

4IAjqbGxC

4IAjqbGxC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

180 Notes to Chapter 9<strong>the</strong> latter all agree that such a person must be executed. Hence, it is not just <strong>the</strong>declaration but <strong>the</strong> successful seduction <strong>in</strong>to idolatry that matters.42. m Sanh 7:5.43. Mk. 14:61–64; Lk. 22:67–71; John 19:7.44. y Taan 2:1/24, fol. 65b. A late and much more developed version of thismidrash can be found <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Saloniki 1521–1527 edition of <strong>the</strong> collection calledYalqut Shimoni, § 765 (end); see Maier, <strong>Jesus</strong> von Nazareth, pp. 87f. (who aga<strong>in</strong>expla<strong>in</strong>s <strong>Jesus</strong> away).45. This latter part is an abbreviated version of Num. 23:19.46. This last l<strong>in</strong>k of <strong>the</strong> cha<strong>in</strong> is ra<strong>the</strong>r loose; <strong>in</strong> particular, <strong>the</strong> promise toascend to heaven has no equivalent <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Bible verse.47. Maier, <strong>Jesus</strong> von Nazareth, pp. 76–82.48. Maier (ibid., p. 79) refers to <strong>the</strong> parallel with <strong>the</strong> biblical Adam: likeAdam, who ultimately was driven out of Paradise (and regretted his hubris),Hiram was ousted from his power (and regretted his hubris). This does not makemuch sense <strong>in</strong> our context.49. In <strong>the</strong> first part of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpretation, <strong>the</strong> emphasis is placed, not on Godnot be<strong>in</strong>g a man/Son of Man, but on God not be<strong>in</strong>g a man who lies/a Son ofMan who repents.50. More precisely: it appears, except for Acts 7:56 (<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> mouth ofStephen), only <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gospels and only <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> mouth of <strong>Jesus</strong>. On <strong>the</strong> “historicity”of <strong>the</strong> title see Geza Vermes, <strong>Jesus</strong> <strong>the</strong> Jew: A Historian’s Read<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong>Gospels, Philadelphia: Fortress, 1981, pp. 177–186.51. See Ephraim E. Urbach, “Homilies of <strong>the</strong> Rabbis on <strong>the</strong> Prophets of <strong>the</strong>Nations and <strong>the</strong> Balaam Stories,” Tarbiz 25, 1955/56, pp. 286f.52. Maier, <strong>Jesus</strong> von Nazareth, p. 80.53. PesR 21, ed. Friedmann, fol. 100b–101a. The attribution to R. Hiyya barAbba is <strong>the</strong> reason why I <strong>in</strong>clude this midrash <strong>in</strong> my discussion, despite <strong>the</strong> (relatively)late date of <strong>the</strong> Pesiqta Rabbati compilation.54. In <strong>the</strong> plural.55. In <strong>the</strong> s<strong>in</strong>gular.56. The standard prooftext for this is Mekhilta, Yitro 5, ed. Horovitz-Rab<strong>in</strong>,pp. 219f. (with many parallels).57. The classical prooftext is BerR 1:7, ed. Theodor-Albeck, I, p. 4 (aga<strong>in</strong>with many parallels).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!