15.08.2015 Views

Jesus in the Talmud

4IAjqbGxC

4IAjqbGxC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Notes to Chapter 6 169our understand<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> historical event, this is not my concern here: I am concernedwith <strong>the</strong> (possible) talmudic read<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> Gospels, not with <strong>the</strong> historicalreality. Also, W<strong>in</strong>ter’s brief analysis of our talmudic Baraita (p. 144) is solely<strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> narrowly def<strong>in</strong>ed question of its historicity and, of course, provesits “unhistorical character.”31. m Sanh 6:4 and 7:4.32. Mt. 26:62–65; Mk. 14:61–64; Lk. 22:66–71; John 19:7.33. Mt. 27:17, 22, 29, 37, 39–43; Mk. 15:2, 12, 18, 26, 32; Lk. 23:2–5, 35, 37,39; John 18:33, 37; 19:3, 12, 14f., 19, 21.34. Mt. 26:61; Mk. 14:58.35. Mt. 12:23f. (Mk. 3:22; Lk. 11:15).36. See above, p. 19.37. Maier, <strong>Jesus</strong> von Nazareth, p. 227. On this, see <strong>the</strong> critique by Horbury,Jews and Christians, p. 104.38. m Sanh 4 and 5. To avoid a misunderstand<strong>in</strong>g: I am not suggest<strong>in</strong>g here(and with similar phrases) that <strong>the</strong> Gospels are based on <strong>the</strong> Mishna. Ra<strong>the</strong>r, Iam argu<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong> Halakha presupposed here <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gospels is similar to <strong>the</strong>Halakha (later) codified <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mishna.39. Mt. 26:59; Mk. 14:55.40. Explicitly only <strong>in</strong> Mark.41. The concurrent testimony only <strong>in</strong> Mat<strong>the</strong>w (26:60); Mark <strong>in</strong>sists that evenhere <strong>the</strong> two witnesses did not agree on <strong>the</strong> circumstances of <strong>the</strong> crime (14:59).42. “I am” (Mk. 14:62).43. “You have said so” (Mt. 26:64).44. Mt. 26:65f.; Mk. 14:63f.45. This has been suggested to me by my graduate student Moulie Vidas,when we were read<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> texts toge<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> a private read<strong>in</strong>g course.46. (1) Mt. 16:21; Mk. 8:31; Lk. 9:22; (2) Mt. 17:22f.; Mk. 9:30f.; Lk. 9:44;(3) Mt. 20:17–19; Mk. 10:32–34; Lk. 18:31–33.47. Mk. 10:32–34.48. See, e.g., Mart<strong>in</strong> Hengel, Crucifixion <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ancient World and <strong>the</strong> Follyof <strong>the</strong> Message of <strong>the</strong> Cross, London: SCM, and Philadelphia: Fortress, 1977,especially pp. 33ff.49. Maier, <strong>Jesus</strong> von Nazareth, pp. 227f.50. t Sanh 9:7; see also Sifre Deuteronomy, 221 (ed. F<strong>in</strong>kelste<strong>in</strong>, p. 254),where <strong>the</strong> death penalty of be<strong>in</strong>g hanged alive “as is done by <strong>the</strong> [non-Jewish]government” is explicitly mentioned. On <strong>the</strong> crucifixion <strong>in</strong> Jewish sources, see

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!