15.08.2015 Views

Jesus in the Talmud

4IAjqbGxC

4IAjqbGxC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Introduction 3discussed. Second, <strong>the</strong> starkly antagonistic paradigm of “Judaism” versus“Christianity,” forever frozen, as it were, <strong>in</strong> splendid isolation from eacho<strong>the</strong>r, has come under closer scrut<strong>in</strong>y over <strong>the</strong> past two decades. Theoverly simplistic black-and-white model of <strong>the</strong> one sister religion (“Christianity”)emerg<strong>in</strong>g out of <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r and almost simultaneously break<strong>in</strong>goff from it and choos<strong>in</strong>g its own and <strong>in</strong>dependent path, and of <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r(“Judaism”), remarkably unimpressed by this epoch-mak<strong>in</strong>g event, steer<strong>in</strong>gits own course until be<strong>in</strong>g overcome by <strong>the</strong> historic momentum of <strong>the</strong>stronger “religion,” no longer holds; <strong>the</strong> reality as it transpires from moredetailed and unbiased research is much more complex and perplex<strong>in</strong>g. 4Hence, no matter what <strong>the</strong> accumulation of quantitative evidence, weneed to take very seriously any trace of a discourse between Judaism andChristianity, let alone of a reaction to Christianity’s founder.As a matter of fact, some scholars have taken it exceptionally seriously.The history of research on how <strong>the</strong> Jews of Late Antiquity discussed Christianity<strong>in</strong> general and <strong>Jesus</strong> <strong>in</strong> particular is impressively rich and deservesa study of its own. 5 It takes as its start<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>the</strong> scattered rabb<strong>in</strong>ic evidenceabout <strong>Jesus</strong> and Christianity <strong>in</strong> talmudic sources as well as <strong>the</strong> tractToledot Yeshu, which was widely dissem<strong>in</strong>ated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Middle Ages and<strong>the</strong> early modern period and became <strong>the</strong> major source for Jewish knowledgeabout <strong>Jesus</strong>. One of <strong>the</strong> first landmarks of a Christian exam<strong>in</strong>ationof <strong>the</strong>se Jewish sources, made <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly accessible through Jewish converts,was <strong>the</strong> polemical treatise Pugio fidei (“The Dagger of Faith”) composedby <strong>the</strong> Spanish Dom<strong>in</strong>ican friar Raymond Mart<strong>in</strong>i (d. 1285),which uses many extracts from talmudic and later rabb<strong>in</strong>ic sources. It <strong>in</strong>fluencedmost of <strong>the</strong> subsequent polemical, anti-Jewish pamphlets, particularlyafter <strong>the</strong> lost manuscript was rediscovered by <strong>the</strong> humanistscholar Justus Scaliger (d. 1609) and republished <strong>in</strong> 1651 (Paris) and1678 (Leipzig). In 1681 <strong>the</strong> Christian Hebraist and polyhistorian JohannChristoph Wagenseil, a professor at <strong>the</strong> University of Altdorf <strong>in</strong> Germany, 6published his collection of Jewish anti-Christian polemics Tela igneaSatanae. Hoc est: arcani et horribiles Judaeorum adversus Christum Deumet Christianam religionem libri (“Flam<strong>in</strong>g Arrows of Satan; that is, <strong>the</strong> secretand horrible books of <strong>the</strong> Jews aga<strong>in</strong>st Christ, God, and <strong>the</strong> Christianreligion”), also draw<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong> talmudic literature and <strong>the</strong> Toledot Yeshu. 7The first book solely devoted to <strong>Jesus</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> talmudic literature was <strong>the</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!