15.08.2015 Views

Jesus in the Talmud

4IAjqbGxC

4IAjqbGxC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Notes to Chapter 9 18158. As has been argued, quite stereotypically, aga<strong>in</strong> by Maier (<strong>Jesus</strong> vonNazareth, pp. 244–247).59. Ibid., p. 246.60. Ibid., p. 245.61. Lucian, Death of Peregr<strong>in</strong>us, 13 (Selected Satires of Lucian, ed. and trans.Lionel Casson, New York and London: Norton, 1962, p. 369).62. See The Dead Comes to Life, 19 (Lucian, vol. 3, trans. A. M. Harmon,Cambridge, MA, and London: Harvard University Press, 1921; repr<strong>in</strong>t, 2004,pp. 30f.); The Double Indictment, 25 (ibid., pp. 134f.), 27 (pp. 136f.).63. Tertullian, De spectaculis, 30 (Tertullian Apology—De spectaculis, transl.Glover, pp. 298f.). On this passage, see Horbury, Jews and Christians, pp. 176–179.64. Son of a carpenter: Mt. 13:55; Mk. 6:3; son of a prostitute: see above, ch.1; Sabbath breaker: Mt. 12:1–14; Mk. 2:23–3:6; Lk. 6:1–11; demon-possessed:Mt. 9:34, 10:25, 12:24; Mk. 3:22; Lk. 11:14–23; John 8:48 (demon-possessedSamaritan), 10:20; purchased from Judas: Mt. 26:14f.; Mk. 14:10f.; Lk. 22:3–6;struck with reed and fist: Mt. 27:30; Mk. 15:19; John 19:3; spat upon: Mt. 27:30;Mk. 15:19; given gall and v<strong>in</strong>egar to dr<strong>in</strong>k: Mt. 27:34; Mk. 15:23; John 19:29(v<strong>in</strong>egar only <strong>in</strong> John); secretly stolen away by his disciples: Mt. 27:64; 28:12–15;<strong>the</strong> gardener: John 20:15 (only <strong>in</strong> John).65. Acts 8:9–13 (see above, p. 105); see also John 8:48.66. This motif comes back forcefully <strong>in</strong> Toledot Yeshu, as does <strong>the</strong> motif of <strong>Jesus</strong>’birth from a whore.67. Boyar<strong>in</strong>, Dy<strong>in</strong>g for God, p. 27.68. Richard Kalm<strong>in</strong> (“Christians and Heretics,” pp. 160ff.) also emphasizes<strong>the</strong> difference between <strong>the</strong> earlier (Palest<strong>in</strong>ian) and later (ma<strong>in</strong>ly Babylonian,but also some Palest<strong>in</strong>ian) sources. In addition to <strong>the</strong> possibility of different historicalattitudes (earlier sources are receptive to Christianity’s attractiveness, latersources are much more critical) he br<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong>to play chang<strong>in</strong>g rabb<strong>in</strong>ic rhetoricalattitudes (p. 163) and, <strong>in</strong> particular, a “tendency of <strong>the</strong> Babylonian <strong>Talmud</strong> to <strong>in</strong>cludematerial excluded from Palest<strong>in</strong>ian compilations” (p. 167). This thought isdeveloped much fur<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> his new book, Jewish Babylonia: Between Persia andRoman Palest<strong>in</strong>e (<strong>in</strong> press).69. The major proponent is Michael Avi-Yonah, The Jews of Palest<strong>in</strong>e: A PoliticalHistory from <strong>the</strong> Bar Kokhba War to <strong>the</strong> Arab Conquest, New York:Schocken, 1976, pp. 158ff., 208ff.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!