15.08.2015 Views

Jesus in the Talmud

4IAjqbGxC

4IAjqbGxC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Notes to Chapter 6 167d<strong>in</strong>g and permitt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> halakhic matters; <strong>the</strong>y are also technical terms used <strong>in</strong>magical texts and express<strong>in</strong>g magical powers. See <strong>the</strong> magical use of <strong>the</strong> verbsasar (“to b<strong>in</strong>d with a spell”) and sherei (“to release from a spell”) <strong>in</strong> Sokoloff,Dictionary of Jewish Babylonian Aramaic, pp. 150f., 1179; idem, A Dictionary ofJewish Palest<strong>in</strong>ian Aramaic of <strong>the</strong> Byzant<strong>in</strong>e Period, Ramat-Gan: Bar Ilan UniversityPress, 1990, pp. 68, 567; Giuseppe Veltri, Magie und Halakha. Ansätze zue<strong>in</strong>em empirischen Wissenschaftsbegriff im spätantiken und frühmittelalterlichenJudentum, Tüb<strong>in</strong>gen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1997, pp. 32, 78, 123. Seealso Smith, <strong>Jesus</strong> <strong>the</strong> Magician, p. 114.Chapter 6<strong>Jesus</strong>’ Execution1. Hang<strong>in</strong>g as an actual mode of execution is regarded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Bible as a non-Jewish law (Gen. 4:22; Josh. 8:29; 2 Sam. 21:6–12; Ezra 6:11; Esth. 7:9). On <strong>the</strong>death penalty, see Haim Cohn, The Trial and Death of <strong>Jesus</strong>, New York: Harperand Row, 1971, pp. 211–217, and <strong>the</strong> summary <strong>in</strong> Haim Hermann Cohn andLouis Isaac Rab<strong>in</strong>owitz, “Capital Punishment,” <strong>in</strong> EJ, 1971, vol. 5, cols.142–147.2. m Sanh 7:1: ston<strong>in</strong>g (seqilah), burn<strong>in</strong>g (śerefah), slay<strong>in</strong>g (hereg), and strangl<strong>in</strong>g(heneq).3. Paul W<strong>in</strong>ter <strong>in</strong> his classic On <strong>the</strong> Trial of <strong>Jesus</strong> (Berl<strong>in</strong>: de Gruyter, 1961,pp. 70–74) suggests, ra<strong>the</strong>r unconv<strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>gly, that <strong>the</strong> death penalty of strangl<strong>in</strong>gwas <strong>in</strong>troduced by <strong>the</strong> rabbis <strong>in</strong> order to secretly exercise jurisdiction even <strong>in</strong>capital cases, although <strong>the</strong>y were deprived of this authority after 70 C.E.4. m Sanh 6:1.5. b Sanh 43a. I follow <strong>the</strong> Firenze (II.1.8–9) manuscript with reference to<strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r available manuscripts.6. Or (a different <strong>in</strong>terpretation): “On such and such a day, on such and suchan hour, and <strong>in</strong> such and such a place (<strong>the</strong> crim<strong>in</strong>al will be executed),” announc<strong>in</strong>g<strong>the</strong> precise time of <strong>the</strong> execution.7. This is <strong>the</strong> Mishna lemma, which is commented upon <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g.8. Literally before him, on his way to <strong>the</strong> execution.9. Chronologically, sometime before <strong>the</strong> execution.10. Only <strong>in</strong> Ms. Firenze.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!