concentration camp complex - National Archives and Records ...

Vol. XVI, pp. 75–76, date of testimony, June 12, 1946
Seyss­Inquart is questioned regarding his alleged protestations against
deportations of Dutch Jews to Buchenwald and Mauthausen.
Vol. XVI, pp. 220–21, date of testimony, June 14, 1946
Heinz Max Hirschfeld, Secretary General of the Economic and
Agricultural Ministries in Nazi­occupied Netherlands, is questioned on the
deportation of 400 Jews from Amsterdam to Mauthausen in Feb. 1941. He
is a witness in the case of Seyss­Inquart.
III.29 Records of U.S. Military Tribunals at Nuremberg: Case I: U.S. v. Karl
Brandt et al.
This case was the first of the “Subsequent Proceedings” tried by the U.S.
Government from 1946 to 1949 at Nuremberg. Also referred to as the
“Medical Case” or “Doctors’ Trial,” it brought indictments against 23 per­
sons charged with performing medical experiments on defenseless con­
centration camp inmates against their will. Judgment confirmed that these
experiments were not isolated acts of individual doctors and scientists, but
the result of high­level policy and planning. Trial testimony and exhibits
pertaining to the prosecution of SS Oberfuehrer Viktor Brack, Chief
Administrative Officer in Hitler’s Chancellery, include a small amount of
material on euthanasia programs at Mauthausen and Hartheim Castle. For
the trial testimony, see Official Transcript, Court No. 1, May 16, 1947
(Entry 2, box 11, location: 190/11/15/02). The following trial exhibits are
described as part of the IMT Evidence Files (see III.34 below): NO 426 (affi­
davit by Viktor Brack), NO 1007 (Prosecution Exhibit 413), and NO 2429
(Prosecution Exhibit 498).
III.30 Records of the U.S. Military Tribunals at Nuremberg: Case IV: U.S.
v. Oswald Pohl et al.
The Oswald Pohl case brought to trial 18 leading officers of the SS
Economic and Administration Main Office (SS Wirtschafts und Verwalt­
55