22.12.2012 Views

VSH Turòa nad Bodvou - Nemetschek Scia

VSH Turòa nad Bodvou - Nemetschek Scia

VSH Turòa nad Bodvou - Nemetschek Scia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Type: Arched bridge<br />

Location: Schaarbeek, Belgium (L36N between Brussels-North<br />

and Diegem)<br />

Owner: Infrabel, Belgium<br />

Architect: Tuc Rail, Belgium<br />

Erection Engineering: Ingenieursbureau STENDESS N.V.,<br />

Lovendegem, Belgium<br />

Check of the bridge during erection<br />

Contractor: Victor Buyck Steel Construction N.V., Eeklo, Belgium<br />

Total steel weight: ± 1.650 tons<br />

Total length: 136 m<br />

Building period: 2005<br />

Short description of the project<br />

It concerns the launching of a new bridge for the use of HST (High<br />

Speed Train) traffic at Schaarbeek, Brussels. The new bridge is an<br />

arched bridge with an orthotropic deck. The arches are built-up<br />

box girders. The main beams are built-up I-sections underneath the<br />

orthotropic deck.<br />

In order to reduce the disturbance of the train traffic under the<br />

bridge, the new arched bridge was erected on a newly build<br />

concrete bridge. On this concrete bridge the new arched bridge<br />

was built together and prepared for launching.<br />

Between the existing train tracks erection towers with skids were<br />

built to support the new bridge during launching. The positions of<br />

these erection towers were very non symmetrical because of the<br />

high density of tracks below. This caused an extra difficulty in the<br />

engineering study of the bridge launching.<br />

Ingenieursbureau Stendess N.V. was asked to check the new<br />

bridge during launching and to calculate and propose solutions<br />

for a safe launching.<br />

Several options were calculated and discussed with Victor Buyck<br />

Steel Construction. Challenges like global and local reinforcement<br />

of the main beam and launching with a launching nose lengths<br />

from 10 to 30 m, were investigated and judged. The solution with<br />

a launching nose of 30 m long was chosen. Because of the risk<br />

of buckling the buckling length of the bridge, diagonals were<br />

reduced by placing a horizontal lattice girder.<br />

During the launching, the reactions and the deformations of<br />

the bridge and launching nose were constantly compared with<br />

the calculated values in order to secure a safe launching. The<br />

launching itself was done smoothly and within 7 hours the bridge<br />

was in place.<br />

Use of ESA-Prima Win and SCIA•ESA PT<br />

Description of technical questions to be solved with<br />

ESA-Prima Win<br />

The complete 3D-model was formed with bars, the orthotropic<br />

deck plate was put together as 2D-elements. To realize a realistic<br />

behaviour of the bridge it was necessary to calculate and correct<br />

Launching of arched bridge LN36 Schaarbeek, Belgium<br />

the effective width of the upper flange of the main beams along<br />

the whole bridge length and this for each launching phase. The<br />

effective widths were calculated according EC3 and based upon<br />

the M-lines in the main beam obtained by ESA-Prima Win. The<br />

corrections of the effective width could be easily done by the “rib”<br />

module in ESA-Prima Win.<br />

To avoid overload of the concrete bridge on which the launching<br />

started and on the erection towers it was necessary to perform<br />

constantly corrections with regard to altitude, real precision work.<br />

The input in EPW and obtaining the results of these altitude corrections<br />

out of ESA-Prima Win went smoothly.<br />

The check of the local impact of the reactions into bridge was done<br />

based on EC3 with the use of the results given by ESA-Prima Win.<br />

The altitude corrections, the reactions on the erection towers and<br />

the deformation of the launching nose were calculated for each<br />

launching phase. The results obtained from ESA-Prima Win could<br />

easily be put in table and graphics in order to obtain a document in<br />

which theory and praxis during the launching could be compared<br />

and a safe launching was possible.<br />

Description of our experience with Esa-Prima Win when<br />

realizing the project<br />

• Checking the structure as a combined model with 1D-2D-3D<br />

elements and with a high hyperstatic degree according EC 3.<br />

• The possibility of building up a flexible model to simulate the<br />

different altitude correction on the erection towers.<br />

• The possibility of changing the effective width of the orthotropic<br />

deck along the bridge length.<br />

• The short calculation time for the model pro launching phase<br />

and the easy and fast way to do a global check according<br />

EC 3. This was very important because of the high number of<br />

launching phases to be considered.<br />

Used modules<br />

• Base<br />

• 3D frame<br />

• 3D shell<br />

• Steel code check (EC3)<br />

215

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!