VSH Turòa nad Bodvou - Nemetschek Scia
VSH Turòa nad Bodvou - Nemetschek Scia
VSH Turòa nad Bodvou - Nemetschek Scia
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Author: Ing. Ach. Rudolf Kruliac, Ing. Jozef Petrík<br />
Investor: The town of Kežmarok<br />
Statics: Ing. Mirolav Maèièák, Ing. Peter Purtz<br />
Date: June 2005<br />
Construction Parameters<br />
The bridge type: Foot Bridge<br />
Action of statics: Triple-pole suspension construction<br />
Steel construction type: All-welded pylon, rolled IPE bridge floor<br />
profiles with framework stiffeners<br />
Cross angle: with the main channel of the Poprad River<br />
Bridge length: 63,94 m, from this 52,927 m steel construction<br />
Width: 2,95 m<br />
Roadway: wooden fore-and-aft road<br />
Ropes: Steel coiled single-row transformed STN 02 4315 nominal<br />
diameter 35,3 mm /1+6+12+18+24+30/, at the nominal wire resistance<br />
1370 Mpa/mm2 Pylons: All-welded, shaped O<br />
Material:<br />
Steel S 235, steel S 335, S 355 JO<br />
Steel 120 504 R, 10 425 V<br />
Steel cable terminal 35,5 STN 05 4456/E<br />
Broadleaved species Oak - class SI<br />
Concrete C 25/30 A3L T100 according ST 731201<br />
Construction Description<br />
At suspension bridges the main bearing member is a joist, which<br />
span is reduced by leaning cable suspensions - conducted through<br />
pylons and affected on the supports again by leaning tensions.<br />
The function of cables and pylons is evident and comprehensible<br />
at the first sight.<br />
Ropes, cable ropes with a small diameter vanish in the whole<br />
picture and the construction has a very pleasant effect.<br />
Railing: Handrail created by O profile fi 60,3/5 mm, baluster created<br />
by O profile 88,9/4 mm, baluster range 3 m, vertical backing<br />
members are created by O profile 20 mm.<br />
Bridge floor: It is made of wooden planks<br />
Main girders: Rolled IPE 550 with framework stiffeners with theoretical<br />
height 550 mm<br />
Pylons: They are created as O profile 355,6/20, or 355/6/6.5, in the<br />
lower part fixed into the foundation constructions.<br />
Suspensions: Steel coiled single-row transformed STN 054315<br />
nominal diameter 35,3 mm (1+6+12+18+24+30) at the nominal<br />
wire resistance 1370 MPa/mm2 . Direction of anchor plate sheets<br />
must correspond with the rope direction! Tightening force:<br />
drawing number 103.<br />
Joints and tacking of bridge members: Steel construction is allwelded.<br />
Its parts will be made in the manufacture. A weld, alternatively<br />
screwed, makes assembling joints.<br />
According to the results of geological survey the bridge<br />
filling is solved as following<br />
Pylons<br />
Pylons placing will be made on the ferro concrete foundations<br />
beams and piles with a diameter 600 mm, piles will be fixed into the<br />
rock R4, R2 of maxim. force capacity Uv 580kN. Designed height<br />
of pile fixing assumes steady level of watercourse depending on<br />
the heel pile height and mould height along the rock level R4. It<br />
is necessary to write into the building permit that the presence of<br />
a geologist, static expert, building surveyor while pile drilling is a<br />
must with a following prove of fixed pile height, prove of cantilever<br />
pile height (edge R4 and pile heel).<br />
Left foundation rope (LIDL)<br />
Foundation placement will be on piles, which will be fixed into the<br />
rock R4.<br />
Right foundation rope<br />
Foundation placement will be on gravels G3<br />
Bridge calculation (dynamics, geometric non-linearity / Newton<br />
Raphson Method of calculation / dimensioning of sections) was<br />
made by the software SCIA•ESA PT 5.1.81, supplier SCIA SK Žilina,<br />
Nám. hrdinov 5 , 010 03 Žilina, Slovakia.<br />
At the own calculation it was necessary to define correctly the<br />
elasticity rope modulus, which has a big influence by construction<br />
deformation. We have solved very carefully rope prestress, where<br />
the most optimal solution at the respecting have allowed<br />
sagging and rope safety there was by the type of rope<br />
determination as initial tension (SCIA•ESA PT).<br />
According to the result of the own bridge frequency it was<br />
necessary to determine a dynamic coefficient loading.<br />
From the economical point of view the combination of<br />
two main steel profiles IPE with a framework steel stiffeners<br />
was shown as the most optimal solution.<br />
Bridge for pedestrians over the Poprad River<br />
83