22.12.2012 Views

VSH Turòa nad Bodvou - Nemetschek Scia

VSH Turòa nad Bodvou - Nemetschek Scia

VSH Turòa nad Bodvou - Nemetschek Scia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Project: Bridge ‘Olsene’ across the ‘ Leie’ river<br />

Type: Arched bridge (Bowstring)<br />

Location: River “de Leie”, Dentergem (Oeselgem), Belgium<br />

Owner: Ministerie van de Vlaamse Gemeenschap - Afdeling Wegen<br />

en Verkeer West-Vlaanderen<br />

Architect: Ministerie van de Vlaamse Gemeenschap - Afdeling<br />

metaalstructuren, Brussels, Belgium<br />

Engineering office: Ingenieursbureau Stendess N.V., Lovendegem,<br />

Belgium<br />

Contractor: Steel: Victor Buyck Steel Construction N.V., Eeklo,<br />

Belgium - Concrete: Depret N.V., Zeebrugge, Belgium<br />

Total steel weight: ± 1.000 tons<br />

Total length: 112 m; Span: 110 m<br />

Highest point: ± 20 m (top of arches)<br />

Building period: 2005-2006<br />

Short description of the project<br />

The existing concrete bridge had to be replaced by a new bridge<br />

and this for two reasons.<br />

Firstly, the stability of the existing bridge was no longer guaranteed<br />

for the increased traffic intensity.<br />

Secondly, the free passing under the existing bridge was limited in<br />

height and width and too small for the current ships to pass.<br />

The new bridge is a steel bridge with a span of 110 m, consisting of<br />

2 drive lanes of 4 m and 2 lanes for pedestrians of 2,5 m. The bridge<br />

is an arched bridge (bowstring) with inclined arches of which the<br />

cross sections vary as well in height as in width along the bridge<br />

span. For the bridge deck an orthotropic steel deck with longitudinal<br />

trapezoidal stiffeners was chosen. The bridge is different from<br />

a classic bowstring bridge because the suspensions of the deck at<br />

the arch are not connected to the main deck beams. The suspensions<br />

are connected at the transverse beams, which support the<br />

main deck beams. The whole bridge was completely preassembled<br />

in the workshop, so that the assembly on the spot could be done<br />

smoothly.<br />

The erection, which was studied by Victor Buyck Steel Construction,<br />

was done using a ponton to support the bridge deck temporarily.<br />

In this work of art the great characters of steel came clearly to their<br />

right: the slim line and the playful form of the construction, speed<br />

of assembly and the possibility to combine heavy duty loads with<br />

an architectural design.<br />

Use of ESA-Prima Win and SCIA•ESA PT<br />

Description of technical questions to be solved with<br />

ESA-Prima Win and SCIA•ESA PT<br />

As well for the dimensioning of the steel bridge as for the dimensioning<br />

of the foundations (group of piles) ESA-Prima Win and<br />

SCIA•ESA PT were used.<br />

The complete 3D-model was formed with bars; the orthographic<br />

deck was put together as 2D-elements, with the purpose of creating<br />

the real vertical and lateral stiffness of the bridge. The tension bars,<br />

which support the deck, were simulated as classic bars.<br />

To simulate the horizontal (longitudinal) stiffness of the bridge<br />

supports, a 3D-model was made in which the 3D-bridge structure<br />

and the foundations (group of piles) were combined.<br />

For the calculations with regard to the traffic situation, each bridge<br />

member was given a buckling factor based on the rules of EC3. The<br />

beam check was then made by EC3 steel check of ESA-Prima Win.<br />

The buckling control of the arches was done in three ways. The<br />

first method with EC3-steel check of ESA-Prima Win, the second<br />

method was based on the calculation of the axial critical buckling<br />

force according EC3, the third method used the stability check and<br />

the second order calculation based on EC 3 of ESA-Prima Win. The<br />

second order calculation was done with SCIA•ESA PT. SCIA•ESA PT<br />

gives the possibility of a second order calculation with a predeformation<br />

based on a stability calculation for a 3D-model with bars<br />

and plates. Here SCIA•ESA PT really proved its progress compared<br />

to ESA-Prima win.<br />

In the calculation of this project the use of ESA-Prima Win was<br />

very intense and diverse:<br />

• Combination of 1D-elements and 2D-elements in one<br />

3D-model.<br />

• Combination of different materials in one model (steel bridge<br />

– concrete pile foundation)<br />

• Stability control / critical buckling factor<br />

• Second order calculation based on predeformations from<br />

stability calculations and on EC.<br />

• Use of graphical sections<br />

• Use of cross sections with variable height<br />

• Rib calculations<br />

• Free loads on 2D-model (orthotropic deck)<br />

Description of our experience with ESA-Prima Win and<br />

SCIA•ESA PT when realizing the project.<br />

The challenge in the calculations of the project was found in the<br />

different aspects of steel calculation and in the design of an architectural<br />

bridge for heavy loads.<br />

For this ESA-Prima Win and SCIA•ESA PT were the most suited<br />

software because of the variety of possibilities to check the structure<br />

to the limit, based on linear calculations, EC 3 steel check<br />

control, stability control and second order calculation in one software<br />

program. This could be done in a user friendly and structured<br />

software environment.<br />

Used modules:<br />

• Base<br />

• 3D frame<br />

• 3D shell<br />

• Stability frame<br />

• Second order calculation<br />

Bridge ‘Olsene’ across the ‘Leie’ river<br />

• Steel code check (EC3)<br />

• Rib calculation<br />

• Graphical sections<br />

• Cross sections with variable height<br />

73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!