University of Warwick institutional repository: http://go.warwick.ac.uk ...

il roceivq tho
public which has
Liberul 'zirty a
Enc, 1. ttld*ee (i)
At the next
266,
sympathy and co»oparation. ot the British
long been accustomed to oonoidor the
the stronghold of enti"alavcry feeling in
committee noetinC on lot Ajxil, there was
coma criticism of Allen's uni. l, atcral action in acnding out
the circulars, which had apparently been done without than
knowledge o1 the committee. opposition came from Waller and
A. E. Peace, and it wan eventually decided to make provision
for more diccuaoton between ncotingaw and for setting up
a sub committee to amass facts d arguments relating to
the railway,
(2)
Company point of view,
'Waller presumably objected from an anti-
än the $cuna of Co onn dcbato, the main speakers in favour
of the survey grant 0 Sir John 1 ofnaway and Sir Lo4a Pe21ys
both had a otrang personal interest in the railways The
principal Liberal opponents of the grant wore Lcboucbare
and iarcourt and Allen co onted. cadly on the lack of
Liberal auprort for t)io grant.
(1) F.
(3)
* Alien to Gladstone# 2nd March 1892.
(2) 1'1, l; inutes of meeting hold lot April 1892,
(3) E 8, letter of AUen, 18th Sarah 1892v