18.01.2013 Views

The Descent of Man

The Descent of Man

The Descent of Man

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

fered fundamentally from those <strong>of</strong> the peacock,<br />

in there being two on the same feather (Fig. 55),<br />

one on each side <strong>of</strong> the shaft. Hence I concluded<br />

that the early progenitors <strong>of</strong> the peacock<br />

could not have resembled a Polyplectron. But<br />

on continuing my search, I observed that in<br />

some <strong>of</strong> the species the two ocelli stood very<br />

near each other; that in the tail-feathers <strong>of</strong> P.<br />

hardwickii they touched each other; and, finally,<br />

that on the tail-coverts <strong>of</strong> this same species<br />

as well as <strong>of</strong> P. malaccense (Fig. 56) they were<br />

actually confluent. As the central part alone is<br />

confluent, an indentation is left at both the upper<br />

and lower ends; and the surrounding coloured<br />

zones are likewise indented. A single<br />

ocellus is thus formed on each tail-covert,<br />

though still plainly betraying its double origin.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se confluent ocelli differ from the single<br />

ocelli <strong>of</strong> the peacock in having an indentation at<br />

both ends, instead <strong>of</strong> only at the lower or basal<br />

end. <strong>The</strong> explanation, however, <strong>of</strong> this difference<br />

is not difficult; in some species <strong>of</strong> Polyplec-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!