19.01.2013 Views

coal trade bulletin - Clpdigital.org

coal trade bulletin - Clpdigital.org

coal trade bulletin - Clpdigital.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

38 THE COAL TRADE BULLETIN.<br />

ville; O. A. Rothert, Louisville; A. M. Peter, Lexington;<br />

D. C. Schonthal, Huntington; E. Drennan,<br />

Jenkins; F. D. Rash, Earlington; H. S. Barker,<br />

Lexington; F. D. Wood, Pineville; P. V. Cole,<br />

Barbourville; W. C. Tucker, Benham; R. Dawson,<br />

Hall; W. L. Moss, Pineville.<br />

BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD IS TEST­<br />

ING COKE BREEZE IN AUTOMATIC<br />

STOKERS ON ENGINES OF CONNELLS­<br />

VILLE DIVISION.<br />

Tests of great importance to the coke industry<br />

are now being made by the Baltimore & Ohio railroad<br />

which, if successful, will result in the utilization<br />

of waste material. The officials of the<br />

Connellsville division of the Baltimore & Ohio railroad<br />

are conducting the first of a series of experiments<br />

with coke breeze in the automatic stokers.<br />

The first test, it is said, was a decided success,<br />

although it will take some weeks to determine<br />

whether coke breeze can be used to supplant <strong>coal</strong><br />

for fuel purposes, says the Connellsville Courier.<br />

The utilization of coke breeze has long been one<br />

of the most important problems facing the coke<br />

manufacturers, but as yet no practical commercial<br />

use has been made of it. Coke breeze is the<br />

ashes and fine coke which cannot be used for<br />

smelting purposes. Thousands of tons of it go<br />

to waste annually.<br />

During the tests of automatic stokers on the<br />

Connellsville division of the Baltimore & Ohio<br />

it was suggested that coke breeze might prove<br />

more satisfactory than <strong>coal</strong>. A test was ordered<br />

and it is now being conducted under the direction<br />

of Road Foreman of Engines T. E. Miller. The<br />

first locomotive using coke breeze for fuel was<br />

sent out with Engineer J. M. Stimmel at the throttle.<br />

No official report of the run has yet been<br />

made but it was learned that the breeze proved<br />

splendid fuel, working nicely in the automatic<br />

stoking device and kept a good head of steam at<br />

all times. One of the trainmen is said to have<br />

declared that the coke breeze had better steaming<br />

qaulities than the <strong>coal</strong> that is being used.<br />

Engineer Stimmel first suggested the use of<br />

coke breeze for fuel and prevailed upon the officials<br />

to experiment with it. The test was made between<br />

Connellsville and Smithfield. Usually a<br />

locomotive consumed 11% tons of <strong>coal</strong> in that<br />

distance. The locomotive used for the first test<br />

was given two tons of <strong>coal</strong>, while a car of coke<br />

breeze was attached to the rear of the tender.<br />

Several Baltimore & Ohio officials from Baltimore<br />

made the trip as far as Uniontown. Finding<br />

that the coke breeze was steaming satisfactorily,<br />

they left the train and went back to Connellsville.<br />

The coke breeze, it is stated, is neither too<br />

coarse nor too fine for use in the automatic stokers.<br />

Later a locomotive on the main line was being<br />

run with coke breeze as fuel. Further tests will<br />

be made and a thorough investigation will be made<br />

to determine whether the new fuel can be used to<br />

supplant <strong>coal</strong>.<br />

The coke breeze can be secured cheaper than<br />

<strong>coal</strong>. It is a by-product of the coking industry<br />

that is now without a commercial value, and at<br />

every coke plant in the region tons of it go to<br />

waste every day. This could be loaded and delivered<br />

to the railroads at small cost and provide<br />

a neat source of revenue for the coke operators.<br />

Various uses have been suggested for coke<br />

breeze, but as yet none of them has proved satisfactory,<br />

from a commercial standpoint, and the<br />

operators have not been justified in conserving tlie<br />

waste. The outcome of the Baltimore & Ohio's<br />

test is watched with interest, because if it proves<br />

successful in supplanting <strong>coal</strong> where automatic<br />

stokers are used, steady business for the coke<br />

plants is assured in handling a waste product.<br />

IDLE CARS SHOW INCREASE<br />

AT OPENING OF THE MONTH.<br />

The report of the American Railway association<br />

issued Dec. 8, giving the car surplussages and<br />

shortages, shows:<br />

Surplussages:<br />

Dec. 1, 1913 67,466<br />

Nov. 15, 1913 46,059<br />

Nov. 30, 1912 26,135<br />

Shortages:<br />

Dec. 1, 1913 10,212<br />

Nov. 15, 1913 23,407<br />

Nov. 30, 1912 62,536<br />

These figures show a net surplus of 57,254 cars<br />

as compared with 22,642 on Nov. 15, and a shortage<br />

of 36,401 cars Nov. 30, 1912.<br />

State Mine Inspector Jenkin T. Reese has asked<br />

the Lackawanna county, Pa., court to grant an<br />

injunction against the Peoples' Coal Co. of Scranton,<br />

Pa., restraining the company from continuing<br />

operations in the Oxlord mine. A suit in equity<br />

was begun on behalf of the state and is based on<br />

affidavits setting out that the mining in the Four-<br />

Foot vein is unsafe and endangers the lives of 65<br />

mineis employed in the workings in West Scranton.<br />

A petition in involuntary bankruptcy was recently<br />

filed against the Oak Leaf Coal Co.. of<br />

Cordova, Ala. The petitioning creditors were:<br />

The Hendon Hardware Co., J. A. Williams, Lantrip<br />

Bros., and J. P. Higginbottom, all of Cordova.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!