coal trade bulletin - Clpdigital.org
coal trade bulletin - Clpdigital.org
coal trade bulletin - Clpdigital.org
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
58 THE COAL TRADE BULLETIN.<br />
Colorado Strike Situation is Quite «nd But Little<br />
Progress is Made Toward Settlement.<br />
(CONTINUED FROM PAGE 26)<br />
and others, the output of which is not required<br />
for this season's business, will not be opened until<br />
the beginning of another season.<br />
"The <strong>trade</strong> in steel and iron is lighter than it<br />
has been in a number of years. Be cause of this<br />
and the additional reason that there are still large<br />
stocks of <strong>coal</strong> in the hands of dealers, placed there<br />
immediately prior to the strike, the demand for<br />
Colorado <strong>coal</strong> for the<br />
REMAINDER OE THE WINTER<br />
will be at deast 20 per cent. lighter than usual.<br />
The number of men necessary to produce the required<br />
output can easily be secured dining the<br />
month of December.<br />
"J. C. OSGOOD,<br />
"D. W. BROWN,<br />
"J. F. WELBORX."<br />
Dec. 4 the result of the referendum vote of the<br />
miners on the settlement proposition of Gov. Ammons<br />
was tabulated and it was found to be overwhelmingly<br />
adverse to accenting the proposition.<br />
This fact was communicated to Secretary of Labor<br />
Wilson, who, in turn, notified Gov. Amnions of<br />
the result.<br />
That there is no obstacle to the Department of<br />
Justice prosecuting the indictments against the<br />
officials of the Tnited Mine Workers of Pueblo.<br />
Colo., was made plain at the executive offices,<br />
Washington, D. C, Dec. S. President Wilson<br />
told callers that there was nothing in the law that<br />
"interfered with the usual processes of justice."<br />
The President made it plain that prosecution can<br />
be undertaken by the United States district attorney<br />
for the Colorado district.<br />
Eugene McGraw, international <strong>org</strong>anizer of the<br />
United Mine Workers of America, who succeeded<br />
Adolph Germer as director of the strike after the<br />
arrest of the latter, was arrested by the military<br />
authorities on Dec. 9 in connection with the investigation<br />
into the killing of three mine guards<br />
and a chauffeur near La Veta Nov. 8.<br />
Warrants for the arrest of the United Mine<br />
Workers of America officers and members indicted<br />
by the federal grand jury at Pueblo last<br />
week were placed in the hands of United States<br />
Marshal Dew-ey C. Bailey at Denver on the same<br />
day. District Attorney Harry E. Kelley said that<br />
the warrants would be served at once. He said<br />
that the cases would be prosecuted in the United<br />
States District court notwithstanding reports that<br />
Department of Justice officials were to determine<br />
whether the cases should go to trial.<br />
Secretary Wilson of the Department of Labor<br />
had an hour's conference with President Wilson<br />
on the night of Dec. 9. concerning the Colorado<br />
<strong>coal</strong> strike situation. He laid before the Presi<br />
dent all the<br />
DETAILS OF THE SITUATION<br />
he had obtained, but said after he left the White<br />
House that he was not prepared to make an announcement<br />
of the future course of the government.<br />
The chronological story of tlie happenings in<br />
the Colorado strike field in the Dec. 1 issue of THE<br />
COAL TRADE BULLETIN closed with a brief statement<br />
that the miners had rejected the proposed<br />
bases of settlement made by Gov. Amnions and by<br />
Gov. Ammons and Secretary of Labor Wilson, and<br />
that the operators had accepted these proposals.<br />
The text of these proposals is:<br />
"Denver, Colo., Nov. 27.<br />
"Messrs. J. F. Welborn, John C. Osgood, D. W.<br />
Brown, operators; and Messrs. T. X. Evans,<br />
Archie Allison, David Hammon, miners, Denver,<br />
Colo.<br />
"Gentlemen:—Having listened to your conference<br />
throughout yesterday and believing from representations<br />
made that there is no material difference<br />
between you sufficient to warrant a continuance<br />
of the present difficulties, I desire to make a<br />
suggestion for the termination of the piesent industrial<br />
dispute.<br />
"The one apparently insurmountable obstacle to<br />
a settlement was the recognition of the union, and<br />
almost every other material difference between you<br />
hinged about that question, or is covered by existing<br />
law.<br />
"There is no law compelling the operators to<br />
recognize the union nor to permit tbe employes<br />
to exact that recognition. The statute does provide,<br />
however, for the right to join a union if the<br />
miners so wish without coercion or interference.<br />
This law has been read to all the conferees and its<br />
provisions agreed to by each conferee. It reads<br />
as follows, and I suggest to you that its provisions<br />
be made the basis of a conclusion on this point:<br />
" Tt shall be unlawful for any individual, company<br />
or corporation or any member of any firm,<br />
or agent, officer or employe of any company or<br />
corporation, to prevent employes from forming.<br />
joining or belonging to any lawful <strong>org</strong>anization.<br />
union, society or political party, or to coerce or<br />
attempt to coerce employes by discharging or<br />
threatening to discharge them from their employ<br />
or the employ of any firm, company or corporation,<br />
because of their connection with such lawful<br />
labor <strong>org</strong>anization, union, society or political<br />
party.'—Section 3925, Reviser! Statutes of Colorado<br />
1903.<br />
"Bearing in mind the discussion on the other<br />
points involved, I suggest the following as a satisfactory<br />
solution:<br />
"The employment of a cheekweighman as pro-