coal trade bulletin - Clpdigital.org
coal trade bulletin - Clpdigital.org
coal trade bulletin - Clpdigital.org
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
56 THE COAL TRADE BULLETIN.<br />
LABOR UNIONS COME UNDER SHERMAN<br />
LAW AND MUST OBEY IT IS DECISION<br />
OF UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS<br />
IN DANBURY HATTERS CASE.<br />
The United States court of appeals at New York<br />
Dec. 18 decided the famous Danbury hatters' case<br />
in favor of D. F. Loewe, the plaintiff, and against<br />
the ITnited Hatters of North America. The court<br />
affirmed a judgment in favor of Mr. Loewe and<br />
against the hatters' <strong>org</strong>anization for $252,130.<br />
With interest and costs the judgment now<br />
amounts to $272,000. At the first trial held in<br />
1909. the plaintiff obtained a judgment for $232,-<br />
240.<br />
Sustaining the second judgment. Judge Coxe<br />
declared that it was no longer debatable "that the<br />
anti-trust act is applicable to such combinations<br />
as are alleged in the complaint," and that the act<br />
made no distinctions between classes of combinations<br />
or individuals. The court held that it had<br />
been clearly established that the plaintiffs were<br />
engaged in an interstate business and that the defendants<br />
are members of a <strong>trade</strong>s union, and affiliated<br />
with the American Federation of Labor, "one<br />
of the objects of the latter <strong>org</strong>anization being to<br />
assist its members in any 'justifiable boycott' and<br />
with financial help in the event of a strike or<br />
lockout."<br />
It was shown at the trial that in March, 1901,<br />
the United Hatters had resolved to unionize the<br />
factory of the plaintiffs and that Mr. Loewe had<br />
been informed by the union officials that the hatters<br />
"would resort to the usual methods," in case<br />
their plan should meet with opposition. On<br />
July 6, 1902, the plaintiff's employes were directed<br />
to go on strik3, and it is claimed that almost immediately<br />
a boycott was established. The plaintiffs<br />
assert that this measure "converted a profit<br />
of $27,000 in 1910 into losses, ranging from $17,-<br />
000 in 1902 to $3,000 in 1904.<br />
Judge Coxe said in conclusion of his finding:<br />
"No one disputes the proposition that labor<br />
unions are lawful. All must admit that they are<br />
not only lawful but highly beneficial when legally<br />
and fairly conducted, but like all other combinations,<br />
irrespective of their objects and purposes<br />
they must obey the law."<br />
MISSOURI COAL OUTPUT FOR 1912 SHOWS<br />
LARGEST PRODUCTION IN THE STATES<br />
HISTORY.<br />
Commissioner John T. Fitzpatrick of the bureau<br />
of labor statistics of Missouri, in a <strong>bulletin</strong> entitled<br />
"Missouri's Visible Coal Supply, the Yearly<br />
Output," says:<br />
The 1912 output of Missouri amounted to 4,339,-<br />
856 short tons, consisting of 4,322,116 tons of<br />
bituminous, 14,157 tons of block, and 3,583 tons<br />
of cannel <strong>coal</strong>, valued at $7,633,S64. It was the<br />
highest production of any single year dating from<br />
1S40, when extensive mining of <strong>coal</strong> for commercial<br />
purposes commenced in Missouri. This<br />
was an increase of 503,749 tons, or 13.13 per cent.<br />
in quantity and of $1,030,798, or 15.61 per cent.<br />
in value over 1911, when the production amounted<br />
to 3,836,107 short tons, valued at $6,603,066. Prior<br />
to 1912 the largest production of <strong>coal</strong> in Missouri<br />
was in 1903, when it amounted to $4,238,586 tons,<br />
about 100,000 less than that of 1912.<br />
Coal niining in Missouri in 1912 gave employment<br />
to 9,704 men, who worked an average of<br />
206 days, compared with 10,259 men and 182 days<br />
in 1911. The rate of production per man is low,<br />
being 477 tons for the year and 2.17 tons for<br />
each day in 1912, and 374 tons for the year and<br />
2.05 tons per day in 1911.<br />
In 1912, of the 4,339,856 tons of <strong>coal</strong> mined in<br />
Missouri 3,SOS,332 tons were shipped from the<br />
producing counties; 432,051 tons were used in<br />
local <strong>trade</strong> and 99,437 tons were consumed at the<br />
mines for steam and heating purposes.<br />
Information furnished Superintendent of Statistics<br />
A. T. Edmonston for use in the <strong>coal</strong> <strong>bulletin</strong><br />
is that 20 men were killed in Missouri <strong>coal</strong><br />
mines in 1912, as compared to eight in 1911.<br />
Sixteen of the fatalities occurred underground.<br />
The death rate per 1,000 employes was 2.06, as<br />
compared to .8 in 1911.<br />
Macon county holds first rank for its quantity<br />
and value for <strong>coal</strong> mined in Missouri in 1912,<br />
the output being 818,170 tons and the value<br />
$1,251,755. The surplus shipped was 779,358 tons.<br />
Lafayette county mined 749,598 tons, worth $1,-<br />
454.965, and shipped a surplus of 683,283 tons.<br />
Blair county produced 593,667 tons, worth $965,-<br />
8S0, and shipped to outside markets, chiefly in<br />
the state, 565,015 tons. Randolph county mined<br />
483,903 tons, worth $7S1,919, and shipped 448,450<br />
tons. Other producing counties are: Audrain,<br />
Benton, Bates, Bonne, Callaway, Dade, Henry,<br />
Linn, Putnam, Ray, Caldwell, Cass, Clay, Moniteau,<br />
Platte, Schuyler, Sullivan and Vernon.<br />
The <strong>coal</strong> of Callaway county brought more per<br />
ton than did any of the other Missouri producing<br />
counties, the average price for the year being<br />
$2.46; then came Lafayette county with $2.29<br />
per ton and Audrain county with $2.22. Counties<br />
with over one thousand working <strong>coal</strong> miners are<br />
Lafayette, Macon and Randolph.<br />
Fire was discovered in the old Echo mine of the<br />
Monongahela River Consolidated Coal & Coke Co.,<br />
near Fayette City, Pa., Jan, 1, and for a short<br />
time it was feared the flames might communicate<br />
with the Tremont mine, but they were confined<br />
to about 500 feet of the Echo mine, and were put<br />
out in a few days.