19.01.2013 Views

coal trade bulletin - Clpdigital.org

coal trade bulletin - Clpdigital.org

coal trade bulletin - Clpdigital.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

56 THE COAL TRADE BULLETIN.<br />

of this week without anything accomplished.<br />

"The operators of the four states have up to the<br />

present been working<br />

IN APPARENT HARMONY.<br />

"The above information is respectfully submit<br />

ted to all the members of the Pittsburgh Vein<br />

Operators' Association."<br />

The following statement was issued on Feb. 25<br />

by Secretary William G'*een for President John P.<br />

White of the niiners:<br />

"The atmosphere has been cleared until now<br />

the matters of difference have been narrowed down<br />

to two or three.<br />

"The operators and miners owe it to themselves,<br />

as well as to the public at large, to reach an agreement<br />

here. It would be a moral 'rime to involve<br />

the bituminous <strong>coal</strong> industry in either a suspension<br />

or a strike. Improvement of industrial and<br />

business conditions is being brought about gradually<br />

and in this effort those representing both<br />

the operators and the miners should lend their<br />

co-operation ancl support.<br />

"I am of the opinion that a continued, patient.<br />

honest and painstaking effort on the part of both<br />

sides will result ultimately in an agreement)<br />

There is no cause for alarm. Both sides entertain<br />

toward each other a pacific attitude.<br />

"I do not believe there will be a stiike in the<br />

bituminous <strong>coal</strong> fields. The miners' representatives<br />

are earnestly endeavoiing to work out a<br />

settlement and to preserve peace."<br />

The statement went on to say that no political<br />

ambitions were influencing the attitude of the<br />

miners' officials.<br />

The next evening. Feb. 26, after final adjournment<br />

the following statement was issued tor the<br />

miners' Internationa] union by President White:<br />

"The joint conference of <strong>coal</strong> operators and miners<br />

representing Ohio, Western Pennsylvania. Indiana<br />

ancl Illinois was unable to agree upon the<br />

matters of difference between them. There appeared<br />

'o be several questions upon whieli they<br />

could not agree at this time. Failure to agree.<br />

however, does not necessarily mean a strike in the<br />

bitumious <strong>coal</strong> mining industry. The breaking<br />

up of negotiations is a matter of concern, but tinsituation<br />

is<br />

XOT HEX SERIOUS.<br />

"The present contract does not expire until<br />

March 31. consequently there still remains an<br />

entire month during which a settlement may be<br />

brought about between the operators and miners<br />

directly, or a policy adopted by the international<br />

<strong>org</strong>anization of tbe United Mine Workers of America,<br />

which in itself would result in industrial<br />

peace. We have been in session foi more than<br />

(wo weeks and during all that time a friendly<br />

feeling has prevailed; even when we adjourned<br />

without date. There was no bitterness or feeling<br />

manifested on either side.<br />

"The policy of the United Mine Workers of<br />

America is to work out an agreement to take the<br />

place of the piesent one, which expires on .March.<br />

31. 1914. without a strike or without interruption<br />

in the niining industry. It is our purpose to<br />

work to that end and so shape our policy as to<br />

bring about this result."<br />

After adjournment XV. L. Schmick, president of<br />

the Illinois operators and chairman of the joint<br />

i onference, issued the following statement for the<br />

operators:<br />

"The representatives of the <strong>coal</strong> operators of<br />

Western Pennsylvania, Ohio, Indiana ancl Illinois.<br />

met in joint conference with the miners' representatives<br />

from these respective states and were<br />

confronted with the following demands of the<br />

miners.<br />

"1st. A universal mine-run basis.<br />

" -2nd. A flat five-cent per ton advance and a<br />

10 per cent increase in day labor, these two items<br />

alone amounting to about $14,000,000 advance per<br />

year.<br />

"'old. A complete checkoff notwithstanding<br />

tlie grave question in regard to the legality of the<br />

check-off. and numerous other demands.<br />

"In turn<br />

THE OPERATORS DEMANDED:<br />

" '1st. That tbe rights of employers ancl owners<br />

of property be recognized.<br />

" '2nd. That the machine differential in Illinois<br />

ancl Indiana be adjusted.<br />

" '3rd. That no check-off be made.<br />

"•4th. The es ( ablishment of a couit of last resort<br />

to arbitrate all disputes.<br />

" '5th. A proper financial penalty for violation<br />

of contract by either party.<br />

" '6th. The right to employ sufficient supervising<br />

officers for the protection of life and property,<br />

with other minor demands."<br />

"After nearly three weeks argument and conference<br />

the operators offered to renew the present<br />

wage agreement which carries with it the highest<br />

wages paid in tbe <strong>coal</strong> mining industry in the<br />

world. This offer was made notwithstanding present<br />

business conditions.<br />

"This proposition was refused by the miners<br />

who prior to the settlement of any other question<br />

insisted upon the settlement of clause seventh of<br />

the miners' demands, which reads as follows:<br />

'We demand that all local inequalities and internal<br />

differences be referred to the various states<br />

affected for settlement.' This demand the opeiators<br />

refused, as the granting of such a demand<br />

would have meant an incomplete contract. The<br />

conference thereupon adjourned sine die."

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!