coal trade bulletin - Clpdigital.org
coal trade bulletin - Clpdigital.org
coal trade bulletin - Clpdigital.org
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
56 THE COAL TRADE BULLETIN.<br />
of this week without anything accomplished.<br />
"The operators of the four states have up to the<br />
present been working<br />
IN APPARENT HARMONY.<br />
"The above information is respectfully submit<br />
ted to all the members of the Pittsburgh Vein<br />
Operators' Association."<br />
The following statement was issued on Feb. 25<br />
by Secretary William G'*een for President John P.<br />
White of the niiners:<br />
"The atmosphere has been cleared until now<br />
the matters of difference have been narrowed down<br />
to two or three.<br />
"The operators and miners owe it to themselves,<br />
as well as to the public at large, to reach an agreement<br />
here. It would be a moral 'rime to involve<br />
the bituminous <strong>coal</strong> industry in either a suspension<br />
or a strike. Improvement of industrial and<br />
business conditions is being brought about gradually<br />
and in this effort those representing both<br />
the operators and the miners should lend their<br />
co-operation ancl support.<br />
"I am of the opinion that a continued, patient.<br />
honest and painstaking effort on the part of both<br />
sides will result ultimately in an agreement)<br />
There is no cause for alarm. Both sides entertain<br />
toward each other a pacific attitude.<br />
"I do not believe there will be a stiike in the<br />
bituminous <strong>coal</strong> fields. The miners' representatives<br />
are earnestly endeavoiing to work out a<br />
settlement and to preserve peace."<br />
The statement went on to say that no political<br />
ambitions were influencing the attitude of the<br />
miners' officials.<br />
The next evening. Feb. 26, after final adjournment<br />
the following statement was issued tor the<br />
miners' Internationa] union by President White:<br />
"The joint conference of <strong>coal</strong> operators and miners<br />
representing Ohio, Western Pennsylvania. Indiana<br />
ancl Illinois was unable to agree upon the<br />
matters of difference between them. There appeared<br />
'o be several questions upon whieli they<br />
could not agree at this time. Failure to agree.<br />
however, does not necessarily mean a strike in the<br />
bitumious <strong>coal</strong> mining industry. The breaking<br />
up of negotiations is a matter of concern, but tinsituation<br />
is<br />
XOT HEX SERIOUS.<br />
"The present contract does not expire until<br />
March 31. consequently there still remains an<br />
entire month during which a settlement may be<br />
brought about between the operators and miners<br />
directly, or a policy adopted by the international<br />
<strong>org</strong>anization of tbe United Mine Workers of America,<br />
which in itself would result in industrial<br />
peace. We have been in session foi more than<br />
(wo weeks and during all that time a friendly<br />
feeling has prevailed; even when we adjourned<br />
without date. There was no bitterness or feeling<br />
manifested on either side.<br />
"The policy of the United Mine Workers of<br />
America is to work out an agreement to take the<br />
place of the piesent one, which expires on .March.<br />
31. 1914. without a strike or without interruption<br />
in the niining industry. It is our purpose to<br />
work to that end and so shape our policy as to<br />
bring about this result."<br />
After adjournment XV. L. Schmick, president of<br />
the Illinois operators and chairman of the joint<br />
i onference, issued the following statement for the<br />
operators:<br />
"The representatives of the <strong>coal</strong> operators of<br />
Western Pennsylvania, Ohio, Indiana ancl Illinois.<br />
met in joint conference with the miners' representatives<br />
from these respective states and were<br />
confronted with the following demands of the<br />
miners.<br />
"1st. A universal mine-run basis.<br />
" -2nd. A flat five-cent per ton advance and a<br />
10 per cent increase in day labor, these two items<br />
alone amounting to about $14,000,000 advance per<br />
year.<br />
"'old. A complete checkoff notwithstanding<br />
tlie grave question in regard to the legality of the<br />
check-off. and numerous other demands.<br />
"In turn<br />
THE OPERATORS DEMANDED:<br />
" '1st. That tbe rights of employers ancl owners<br />
of property be recognized.<br />
" '2nd. That the machine differential in Illinois<br />
ancl Indiana be adjusted.<br />
" '3rd. That no check-off be made.<br />
"•4th. The es ( ablishment of a couit of last resort<br />
to arbitrate all disputes.<br />
" '5th. A proper financial penalty for violation<br />
of contract by either party.<br />
" '6th. The right to employ sufficient supervising<br />
officers for the protection of life and property,<br />
with other minor demands."<br />
"After nearly three weeks argument and conference<br />
the operators offered to renew the present<br />
wage agreement which carries with it the highest<br />
wages paid in tbe <strong>coal</strong> mining industry in the<br />
world. This offer was made notwithstanding present<br />
business conditions.<br />
"This proposition was refused by the miners<br />
who prior to the settlement of any other question<br />
insisted upon the settlement of clause seventh of<br />
the miners' demands, which reads as follows:<br />
'We demand that all local inequalities and internal<br />
differences be referred to the various states<br />
affected for settlement.' This demand the opeiators<br />
refused, as the granting of such a demand<br />
would have meant an incomplete contract. The<br />
conference thereupon adjourned sine die."