coal trade bulletin - Clpdigital.org
coal trade bulletin - Clpdigital.org
coal trade bulletin - Clpdigital.org
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
42 TIIE COAL TRADE BULLETIN.<br />
from a screen eoal basis to mine-run takes place,<br />
the miners may continue at work pending a set<br />
tlement of all questions ill dispute, in the event Local secretaries will post notices of election<br />
an agreement to do so is reached by the repre at least one week prior thereto. No election held<br />
sentatives of the operators and miners of said on any otlier date, nor any votes taken in any<br />
district.<br />
other manner than as herein required will be<br />
Fourth, that all contracts be made for a period regarded as legal. The correctness of the vote<br />
of two years, beginning April 1, 1914. ancl ending cast for and against the proposition must, be<br />
March 31. 1910.<br />
certified to on the returns sent to the Interna<br />
Fifth, that the question of signing agreements tional office by the tellers selected by* the local<br />
with, individual emiiloyers. together with all other for the purpose of tabulating tbe vote. The cor<br />
details of policy necessary to put into effect tbe rectness of the returns must be attested with the<br />
provisions herein stated, is referred to fhe Inter local seal and signatures of president and recordnational<br />
Executive Board with full power to act. ing secretary of tbe local union. The returns<br />
This proposition provides for a settlement by- must be sent to the International secretary not<br />
groups of districts, districts or sub-districts on later than Tuesday, April 21. 1914.<br />
the basis of tbe present prices, with tbe understanding<br />
that in the joint conferences local inequalities<br />
ancl internal questions, both as to prices<br />
and conditions, may be taken up for adjustment.<br />
In behalf of the policy committee we advise<br />
you to vote in favor of the adoption of the proposed<br />
basis of settlement, for tbe following reason)<br />
especially:<br />
First, it means a settlement at not less than<br />
In conclusion we respectfully recommend that<br />
you vote in favor of the acceptance of tbe policy<br />
committee's recommendation. We are convinced<br />
that if you do so it means industrial peace<br />
and no strike. If not, it means a strike with<br />
all its attendant hardships and sacrifices.<br />
Respectfully submitted.<br />
JOHN P. WHITE, President.<br />
the present rate of wages.<br />
Second, it gives districts, sub-districts ancl<br />
FRANK J. HAYES, Vice-Pies.<br />
WM. GREEX, Sec.-Treas.<br />
groups of districts tbe right to take up local<br />
questions both as to prices and conditions of em<br />
ployment for settlement.<br />
Third, the <strong>coal</strong> markets, together with indus<br />
trial and economic conditions, do not justify a<br />
strike at this time if such ean honorably be<br />
avoided.<br />
Fourth, just at this time the non-union opera<br />
tors desire a strike in the <strong>org</strong>anized fields so<br />
they can obtain their contracts. We were re<br />
liably informed that representatives of the nonunion<br />
operators of Kentucky, West Virginia, Penn<br />
sylvania and elsewhere, were in both Philadel prohibiting the same set of individuals holding<br />
phia and Chicago while tbe joint conferences were stock in two distinct corporations even though<br />
in session, doing all within their power to bring they may be engaged in kindred business.<br />
about a disagreement and a strike. And so. The decision was handed down by Judges Gray,<br />
in view of the slack work generally, we are un<br />
Buffington and McPherson of the Third Judicial<br />
willing to play into their hands by going on<br />
Circuit. The action was brought in the Federal<br />
strike, throwing the mines idle and thus allow<br />
court at Trenton, but through a certificate of ex<br />
them to fill the markets with non-union <strong>coal</strong>.<br />
pedition filed by Attorney General McReynolds,<br />
The adoption of this proposition means indus<br />
trial peace, which is best for our <strong>org</strong>anization,<br />
ourselves and our families at this time. If it is<br />
rejected it means a strike. This is the question<br />
which you. by* your voices, are called upon to<br />
answer.<br />
All local unions will vote upon the acceptance<br />
or rejection of the proposition herein recom<br />
mended by the policy committee on Tuesday, April<br />
14, 1914. Tlie vote must be by ballot, each mem<br />
ber of the local union to be supplied with same<br />
and the question shall be in favor of tbe accept<br />
ance of proposition " Vcs" or against "No."<br />
UNITED STATES LOSES SUIT<br />
AGAINST ANTHRACITE ROAD.<br />
The United States Circuit Court filed an opin<br />
ion at Trenton, N. J., April 7, dismissing the suit<br />
of the United States government against the Dela<br />
ware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad Co. and<br />
the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Coal Co.<br />
for alleged violation of the commodities clause<br />
and the Sherman anti-trust law. The court held<br />
that there is no United States law or decision<br />
was heard by the judges of the Court of Appeals<br />
at Philadelphia in January.<br />
The case was considered of the highest import<br />
ance by the government, as it was one of the<br />
steps planned by the Department of Justice in its<br />
efforts to break up what it alleges to be a mon<br />
opoly of the anthracite <strong>coal</strong> <strong>trade</strong>. The case,<br />
which was brought under both the Sherman anti<br />
trust law and the commodities clause of the Hep<br />
burn railroad law, in all probability wil! go direct<br />
to the Supreme Court of the United States.