19.01.2013 Views

coal trade bulletin - Clpdigital.org

coal trade bulletin - Clpdigital.org

coal trade bulletin - Clpdigital.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

42 TIIE COAL TRADE BULLETIN.<br />

from a screen eoal basis to mine-run takes place,<br />

the miners may continue at work pending a set­<br />

tlement of all questions ill dispute, in the event Local secretaries will post notices of election<br />

an agreement to do so is reached by the repre­ at least one week prior thereto. No election held<br />

sentatives of the operators and miners of said on any otlier date, nor any votes taken in any<br />

district.<br />

other manner than as herein required will be<br />

Fourth, that all contracts be made for a period regarded as legal. The correctness of the vote<br />

of two years, beginning April 1, 1914. ancl ending cast for and against the proposition must, be<br />

March 31. 1910.<br />

certified to on the returns sent to the Interna­<br />

Fifth, that the question of signing agreements tional office by the tellers selected by* the local<br />

with, individual emiiloyers. together with all other for the purpose of tabulating tbe vote. The cor­<br />

details of policy necessary to put into effect tbe rectness of the returns must be attested with the<br />

provisions herein stated, is referred to fhe Inter­ local seal and signatures of president and recordnational<br />

Executive Board with full power to act. ing secretary of tbe local union. The returns<br />

This proposition provides for a settlement by- must be sent to the International secretary not<br />

groups of districts, districts or sub-districts on later than Tuesday, April 21. 1914.<br />

the basis of tbe present prices, with tbe understanding<br />

that in the joint conferences local inequalities<br />

ancl internal questions, both as to prices<br />

and conditions, may be taken up for adjustment.<br />

In behalf of the policy committee we advise<br />

you to vote in favor of the adoption of the proposed<br />

basis of settlement, for tbe following reason)<br />

especially:<br />

First, it means a settlement at not less than<br />

In conclusion we respectfully recommend that<br />

you vote in favor of the acceptance of tbe policy<br />

committee's recommendation. We are convinced<br />

that if you do so it means industrial peace<br />

and no strike. If not, it means a strike with<br />

all its attendant hardships and sacrifices.<br />

Respectfully submitted.<br />

JOHN P. WHITE, President.<br />

the present rate of wages.<br />

Second, it gives districts, sub-districts ancl<br />

FRANK J. HAYES, Vice-Pies.<br />

WM. GREEX, Sec.-Treas.<br />

groups of districts tbe right to take up local<br />

questions both as to prices and conditions of em­<br />

ployment for settlement.<br />

Third, the <strong>coal</strong> markets, together with indus­<br />

trial and economic conditions, do not justify a<br />

strike at this time if such ean honorably be<br />

avoided.<br />

Fourth, just at this time the non-union opera­<br />

tors desire a strike in the <strong>org</strong>anized fields so<br />

they can obtain their contracts. We were re­<br />

liably informed that representatives of the nonunion<br />

operators of Kentucky, West Virginia, Penn­<br />

sylvania and elsewhere, were in both Philadel­ prohibiting the same set of individuals holding<br />

phia and Chicago while tbe joint conferences were stock in two distinct corporations even though<br />

in session, doing all within their power to bring they may be engaged in kindred business.<br />

about a disagreement and a strike. And so. The decision was handed down by Judges Gray,<br />

in view of the slack work generally, we are un­<br />

Buffington and McPherson of the Third Judicial<br />

willing to play into their hands by going on<br />

Circuit. The action was brought in the Federal<br />

strike, throwing the mines idle and thus allow<br />

court at Trenton, but through a certificate of ex­<br />

them to fill the markets with non-union <strong>coal</strong>.<br />

pedition filed by Attorney General McReynolds,<br />

The adoption of this proposition means indus­<br />

trial peace, which is best for our <strong>org</strong>anization,<br />

ourselves and our families at this time. If it is<br />

rejected it means a strike. This is the question<br />

which you. by* your voices, are called upon to<br />

answer.<br />

All local unions will vote upon the acceptance<br />

or rejection of the proposition herein recom­<br />

mended by the policy committee on Tuesday, April<br />

14, 1914. Tlie vote must be by ballot, each mem­<br />

ber of the local union to be supplied with same<br />

and the question shall be in favor of tbe accept­<br />

ance of proposition " Vcs" or against "No."<br />

UNITED STATES LOSES SUIT<br />

AGAINST ANTHRACITE ROAD.<br />

The United States Circuit Court filed an opin­<br />

ion at Trenton, N. J., April 7, dismissing the suit<br />

of the United States government against the Dela­<br />

ware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad Co. and<br />

the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Coal Co.<br />

for alleged violation of the commodities clause<br />

and the Sherman anti-trust law. The court held<br />

that there is no United States law or decision<br />

was heard by the judges of the Court of Appeals<br />

at Philadelphia in January.<br />

The case was considered of the highest import­<br />

ance by the government, as it was one of the<br />

steps planned by the Department of Justice in its<br />

efforts to break up what it alleges to be a mon­<br />

opoly of the anthracite <strong>coal</strong> <strong>trade</strong>. The case,<br />

which was brought under both the Sherman anti­<br />

trust law and the commodities clause of the Hep­<br />

burn railroad law, in all probability wil! go direct<br />

to the Supreme Court of the United States.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!