19.01.2013 Views

coal trade bulletin - Clpdigital.org

coal trade bulletin - Clpdigital.org

coal trade bulletin - Clpdigital.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

22 THE COAL TRADE BULLETIN.<br />

except the operators and miners in that district<br />

agree upon the plan.<br />

One prominent operator is quoted as having<br />

said that the conference would leach an agice­<br />

ment during the present week, or there will be a<br />

break off, and that if the latter comes, Interna­<br />

tional President John P. White will be asked to<br />

aid in arriving at some settlement.<br />

In the meantime not over 10 per cent, of Illi­<br />

nois mines are working, despite the fact that the<br />

men voted to remain at work and that they have<br />

been asked to do so by their officers.<br />

OHIO IS DEADLOCKED.<br />

The wage scale negotiations in Ohio are in a<br />

deadlock, and the prospects are that little to break<br />

the deadlock will be done until the suit of the<br />

operators to test the validity of the anti-screen<br />

law is determined, although subdistrict settle­<br />

ments have been authorized by the mine workers'<br />

officials.<br />

As the outcome of the Ohio wage negotiations<br />

depends largely on the anti-screen bill, the action<br />

taken by the operators to test its constitutionality<br />

must needs be a part of the record covering the<br />

negotiations.<br />

April 10, the Rail & River Coal Co., Mr. \V. R.<br />

Woodford, president, entered suit in the U. S.<br />

District court in Toledo against the Industrial<br />

Commission of Ohio, praying for a perpetual in­<br />

junction to prevent the commission from enforcing<br />

the anti-screen law.<br />

Perpetual injunction is asked in the petition<br />

filed by Hoyt, Dustin, Kelley, McKeehan & An­<br />

drews, who represent the Rail & River Coal Co.,<br />

which was selected by Ohio operators to bring<br />

the action. In its petition the <strong>coal</strong> company as­<br />

serts it owns almost 32,ot)0 acres of <strong>coal</strong> land in<br />

Ohio uiion which are situated mines employing<br />

2,000 persons and produces 2.SOO mine car loads<br />

of <strong>coal</strong> per day, ,600 tons. It charges that were<br />

these mines to be operated one day in violation<br />

of the screen <strong>coal</strong> law, the minimum fines would<br />

amount to $800,000. It also is set forth that<br />

there are 600 mines in Ohio employing 45,000<br />

miners and that the screen <strong>coal</strong> law has prevented<br />

tbe renewal of the working contract for the en­<br />

suing two years.<br />

Wallace D. Yaple, Chillicothe, chairman; Mat­<br />

thew B. Hammond, Columbus, vice-chairman, and<br />

Thomas J. Duffy, East Liverpool, tbe Industrial<br />

Commission of Ohio, are made defendants. Tbe<br />

Rail & River Coal Co. prays not only that these<br />

men be restrained from enforcing the screen <strong>coal</strong><br />

law, but also that they be restrained from enter­<br />

ing the premises of the company to make investi­<br />

gations authorized by the law, from bringing court<br />

action to enforce the law, or to prescribe either<br />

the amount of fine <strong>coal</strong> to be produced or the<br />

amount of impurities permissible in a ton of<br />

mined <strong>coal</strong> when the rules are for the purpose of<br />

forming a basis for wage contracts or payment to<br />

miners.<br />

The specific charges upon which the plea for a<br />

perpetual injunction is based are that it delegates<br />

legislative powers to the commission and vioiates<br />

Article 14 of the United States constitution, which<br />

provides that "No state shall make or enforce<br />

any law which shall abridge the privileges or im­<br />

munities of citizens of the LTnited States; nor<br />

shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty<br />

or property without due process of law."<br />

It is charged the authority of the commission<br />

under the law and the enforcement of the law<br />

would violate this constitutional protection in:<br />

"That it deprives the <strong>coal</strong> company of the lib­<br />

erty of contract and takes property without due<br />

process of law.<br />

"That in conferring authority on the commission<br />

to determine for each operator and miner the<br />

percentage of impurities unavoidable in mining<br />

<strong>coal</strong>, it thus deprives miner and operator of the<br />

right to bargain for the quality of <strong>coal</strong> produced.<br />

"That by conferring on the commission author­<br />

ity to prescribe the percentage of fine <strong>coal</strong> and<br />

impurities to be taken from the mine and pre­<br />

scribing penalties for violations of the rules, it<br />

constitutes unwarranted interference with the<br />

rights and liberties of niiners and operators.<br />

"That it is not within the police powers of the<br />

state.<br />

"That the penalties and fines prescribed in the<br />

act are so extreme and cumulative as to deter and<br />

prevent any person, firm or corporation from challenging<br />

the validity of the act."<br />

Whatever the action of the court, an appeal<br />

will be taken directly to the Supreme Court of the<br />

United States.<br />

April 20 the Ohio mine workers met in special<br />

convention to take up the new wage scale nego­<br />

tiations. The convention determined to stand<br />

by the run-of-mine basis of payment, and the fol­<br />

lowing scale committee to confer with the opera­<br />

tors was named: Samuel Snyder of Athens and<br />

Ge<strong>org</strong>e Brahhigan of Longstreth sub-district No.<br />

1 : Thomas Thomas and L. D. Davis, Pomeroy,<br />

sub-district No. 2: William F. Lincks of Akron<br />

and Leopold Lirquin of New Philadelphia, subdistrict<br />

No. 3; James Starkey and John Saxton,<br />

sub-district No. 4; C. .1. Albasin, Bridgeport, and<br />

Joseph Johnson, Klee, sub-district No. 5; Will C.<br />

Thompson, Cambridge, and Thomas MaeFarlane,<br />

Robbins, sub-district No. 6. With these are<br />

President John Moore. Vice President Lee Hall<br />

and Secretary-Treasurer G. XV. Savage.<br />

(CONTINUEn ON PAGE 42)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!