23.01.2013 Views

View Document Here - Hanford Site

View Document Here - Hanford Site

View Document Here - Hanford Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

WHC-SD-W100-TI-003 Rev. 0<br />

Westinghouse<br />

<strong>Hanford</strong> Company LITERATURE SEARCH RESULTS<br />

From: Chemical Process Engineering<br />

Phone: 6-9616 L5-31<br />

Date: May 27, 1992<br />

Subject: WRAP 2A LITERATURE SEARCH<br />

To: J. L. Westcott H2-58<br />

cc: J. W. Biglin L5-31<br />

D. A. Burbank H1-60<br />

J. A. Hunter L5-31<br />

J, G. Riddelle H2-58<br />

C. A. Petersen H1-60<br />

WOG/F ile-LB<br />

Internal<br />

Memo<br />

CPE-WOG-001<br />

A detailed literature search of waste solidification methods has been<br />

completed and several packets of information generated by the search are<br />

provided. The typically used materials such as portland cement and<br />

variations of it are still the primary referenced solidification material.<br />

However, a couple of new or newer materials are available. These include<br />

sulfur polymer cement, a thermosetting inorganic binder, Aquaset® and<br />

Petroset® inorganic binders used for aqueous and organic liquids<br />

respectively, and Syncrete® a synthetic concrete. These materials will be<br />

considered, evaluated, or tested along with the more familiar materials;<br />

information and test samples of all three have been requested.<br />

To minimize cost and make processing as simple as possible, thermal<br />

processing was limited to s500°F for WRAP 2A. This eliminates<br />

vitrification, synthetic rocks, metal matrices, calcines and ceramic waste<br />

forms from consideration. Also, absorbent materials were not considered<br />

viable candidates since they could be used as solidification matrices for<br />

low-level waste, but not mixed waste since they are not expected to retain<br />

hazardous components and would not normally pass the TCLP test. Some<br />

searches were done for all solidification methods including vitrification so<br />

as not to exclude any references that are potentially useful. A summary of<br />

waste solidification agents is given in Table 1. Table 2 lists the<br />

-sol-itiifirati-on methods ±hat--are--expected to-be--consi-dered-for application at<br />

the WRAP 2A Module.<br />

The use of portland cement and similar materials continues to be the most<br />

referenced of solidification materials. Slag cement references, however,<br />

seem to z^ inmr^ro ' nca J`--`- rna ::^t it might retain radionuclide and hazardous elements<br />

more completelyethan cement. Pozzolan and latex cement might offer<br />

additional advantages over portland cement for certain chemicals or<br />

matrfieere iii^ewise ^rwirosioRee and Rlaster-of paris are gypsum cements<br />

that set well with neutral and acidic wastes. Other cementitious materials<br />

to consider include grout mixes, polymer modified cement, and SyncreteA. In<br />

contrast, organic binders offer solidification agents that are expected to<br />

form waste products exhibiting lower leach characteristics and higher waste<br />

loadings than cement products. Thus, they will be considered, but they will<br />

E-3<br />

NrNOnI oNr°Hnns and EnpYwekV CpNnetor for the US Wo^nt at Emryy

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!