Media Study - Medija centar Beograd

a reply has been submitted to the information the correction of which has already beenpublished or the information has already been revoked,
or the effect that was to have been achieved by the publication of the reply or part of the reply has already been achieved, unless a repeated
publication of the information is at issue;
the accuracy, completeness or correct imparting of the information the reply refers to is obvious, generally known or established by an
irrevocable decision by a competent body;
the content of the information the reply refers to is the same in content as the information authorized by the person requesting the publication
of the reply;
the inaccuracy, incompleteness or incorrect imparting of the information the reply refers to is insignificant;
the reply refers to information stated in a public parliamentary debate or a public debate in a parliamentary body or in a court proceeding.
Reasons for the non-publication of a reply shall also apply to the non-publication of a part of the reply.
Informing the Submitter of a Reply of the Reason for the Non-Publication of a
Reply
Article 59
If a media outlet, i.e. the program in which the information the reply refers to is published i.e. broadcast at intervals exceeding 30 (thirty) days,
the responsible editor shall within seven days upon reception of the request for the publication of a reply inform the submitter of the request of
the reason for refusing to publish the reply.
Reasons for the Court Not to Order the Publication of a Correction
Article 60
281