R_Bibb_Medical_Modelling_The_Application_of_Adv.pdf
R_Bibb_Medical_Modelling_The_Application_of_Adv.pdf
R_Bibb_Medical_Modelling_The_Application_of_Adv.pdf
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Case studies 107<br />
full co-operation <strong>of</strong> the surgical departments, the radiology department, the<br />
IT department and the RP service provider. <strong>The</strong> implications for the various<br />
departments will differ depending on which technical solution is adopted.<br />
<strong>The</strong> chosen procedure should refl ect the overall needs <strong>of</strong> the patient whilst<br />
taking due account <strong>of</strong> economic factors. Consequently, the organisational<br />
considerations relate to:<br />
• economics and budgeting;<br />
• staff workload and responsibility.<br />
It is widely acknowledged that hospital departments must operate within<br />
strictly controlled budgets. <strong>The</strong>refore, it is crucial to obtain the support and<br />
commitment <strong>of</strong> senior hospital management at the outset <strong>of</strong> a project such<br />
as this. <strong>The</strong> costs involved in setting up the service will have to be met, but<br />
there is likely to be pressure within departments to pass on as much <strong>of</strong> the<br />
cost to other sources <strong>of</strong> funding, thus minimising the impact on departmental<br />
budgets.<br />
In terms <strong>of</strong> workload, it is likely that each <strong>of</strong> the departments will be<br />
running at capacity, which may lead to confl icts between departments when<br />
the workload is distributed. Departments will try to resist any increase in<br />
their budget requirements or workload. <strong>The</strong>re may be economic reasons<br />
for transferring workload from one department to another.<br />
Careful thought will have to be given as to who takes responsibility for<br />
the key decisions taken during the medical modelling process. It is likely<br />
that clinical departments will want to maintain the maximum amount <strong>of</strong><br />
responsibility and control whilst minimising workload and expenditure.<br />
<strong>The</strong> only practical method <strong>of</strong> resolving this diffi culty is to try different<br />
procedures and determine which one best meets the clinical need. It should<br />
then be a matter <strong>of</strong> using this sound knowledge to apply for the correct<br />
budgeting and resources from hospital management.<br />
It is worth emphasising that the use <strong>of</strong> medical models may drastically<br />
reduce theatre time and its associated costs as well as improving the quality<br />
and accuracy <strong>of</strong> surgery. However, cost savings have to be seen in context.<br />
For elective cases in the British NHS, the operating time available to surgeons<br />
is fi nite and spare time will be taken up by other cases. <strong>The</strong>refore,<br />
the principal effect in a public funded healthcare system will be on waiting<br />
lists and waiting times for surgery. Quality <strong>of</strong> patient care and costeffectiveness<br />
<strong>of</strong> care will improve, but the need for a three-dimensional<br />
model will impose an additional charge on tight budgets. Clinical control<br />
<strong>of</strong> the process can, however, enable many <strong>of</strong> these problems to be minimised.<br />
For example, Fig. 6.4 shows a three-dimensional CT reconstruction<br />
<strong>of</strong> a skull with a fronto-zygomatic bone defect (left). A model was required<br />
to enable a cranioplasty plate to be constructed and to assist planning for<br />
the placement <strong>of</strong> crani<strong>of</strong>acial osseointegrated implants. By eliminating