28.02.2013 Views

R_Bibb_Medical_Modelling_The_Application_of_Adv.pdf

R_Bibb_Medical_Modelling_The_Application_of_Adv.pdf

R_Bibb_Medical_Modelling_The_Application_of_Adv.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Physical reproduction 85<br />

In medical modelling terms, LS models prove useful but perhaps not<br />

ideal. LS models <strong>of</strong>fer reasonable accuracy and surface fi nish and would be<br />

comparable to FDM TM models. <strong>The</strong> strength and toughness <strong>of</strong> the models<br />

is a defi nite advantage, but the powder nature <strong>of</strong> the material leads to a<br />

rough surface, which can trap dirt and grease in handling. This, together<br />

with the porosity <strong>of</strong> the models, poses some concerns for sterilisation, especially<br />

if patient contact is being considered. Unused material remains as<br />

loose powder so it can be removed from internal spaces and voids, although<br />

this may sometimes be diffi cult. <strong>The</strong> advantages and disadvantages <strong>of</strong> LS<br />

are summarised in Table 5.4.<br />

5.5.3 Selective Laser Melting (SLM TM ) and Direct Metal<br />

Laser Sintering (DMLS ® )<br />

SLM TM , the technology behind the MCP Realizer SLM machine (HEK<br />

GmbH, SLM Tech Center Paderborn, Hauptstrasse 35, 33178 Borchen,<br />

Germany), and DMLS ® (EOS GMBH Electro Optical Systems, Robert-<br />

Stirling-Ring 1, D-82152 Krailling/Munich, Germany) are similar in principle<br />

to LS except that high power solid-state lasers are used to melt very<br />

fi ne metal powders in inert gas atmospheres. <strong>The</strong> full melting enables the<br />

production <strong>of</strong> solid, dense metal parts in a single process (i.e. not using<br />

binders or post-process furnace operations that have been previously used<br />

to make metal parts via LS). A variety <strong>of</strong> metals can be used, including<br />

stainless steels, cobalt-chrome and titanium. <strong>The</strong>se processes are relatively<br />

new and, whilst they are not suited to the production <strong>of</strong> models <strong>of</strong> human<br />

anatomy, their potential for producing custom fi tting implants and prostheses<br />

is already evident. Fig. 5.19 shows a mandible made using SLM TM whilst<br />

Fig. 5.20 shows a partial removable denture framework (described in detail<br />

in Section 6.14 Rehabilitation applications case study 7). <strong>The</strong>y also lend<br />

themselves well to the manufacture <strong>of</strong> custom surgical guides, templates<br />

and instruments, as described in Section 6.6 Surgical application case study<br />

4. <strong>The</strong> similar Arcam CAD to Metal ® process (Arcam AB (publ.), Krokslätts<br />

Fabriker 30, SE-431 37 Mölndal, Sweden) utilises an electron beam to melt<br />

Table 5.4 <strong>Adv</strong>antages and disadvantages <strong>of</strong> LS<br />

<strong>Adv</strong>antages Disadvantages<br />

Strong, tough models High cost <strong>of</strong> machine and materials<br />

Reasonably accurate Large machine, nitrogen supply, water cooling<br />

Wide range <strong>of</strong> materials Heat up and cool down time<br />

Poor surface fi nish<br />

Materials not suited to sterilisation

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!