R_Bibb_Medical_Modelling_The_Application_of_Adv.pdf
R_Bibb_Medical_Modelling_The_Application_of_Adv.pdf
R_Bibb_Medical_Modelling_The_Application_of_Adv.pdf
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Physical reproduction 85<br />
In medical modelling terms, LS models prove useful but perhaps not<br />
ideal. LS models <strong>of</strong>fer reasonable accuracy and surface fi nish and would be<br />
comparable to FDM TM models. <strong>The</strong> strength and toughness <strong>of</strong> the models<br />
is a defi nite advantage, but the powder nature <strong>of</strong> the material leads to a<br />
rough surface, which can trap dirt and grease in handling. This, together<br />
with the porosity <strong>of</strong> the models, poses some concerns for sterilisation, especially<br />
if patient contact is being considered. Unused material remains as<br />
loose powder so it can be removed from internal spaces and voids, although<br />
this may sometimes be diffi cult. <strong>The</strong> advantages and disadvantages <strong>of</strong> LS<br />
are summarised in Table 5.4.<br />
5.5.3 Selective Laser Melting (SLM TM ) and Direct Metal<br />
Laser Sintering (DMLS ® )<br />
SLM TM , the technology behind the MCP Realizer SLM machine (HEK<br />
GmbH, SLM Tech Center Paderborn, Hauptstrasse 35, 33178 Borchen,<br />
Germany), and DMLS ® (EOS GMBH Electro Optical Systems, Robert-<br />
Stirling-Ring 1, D-82152 Krailling/Munich, Germany) are similar in principle<br />
to LS except that high power solid-state lasers are used to melt very<br />
fi ne metal powders in inert gas atmospheres. <strong>The</strong> full melting enables the<br />
production <strong>of</strong> solid, dense metal parts in a single process (i.e. not using<br />
binders or post-process furnace operations that have been previously used<br />
to make metal parts via LS). A variety <strong>of</strong> metals can be used, including<br />
stainless steels, cobalt-chrome and titanium. <strong>The</strong>se processes are relatively<br />
new and, whilst they are not suited to the production <strong>of</strong> models <strong>of</strong> human<br />
anatomy, their potential for producing custom fi tting implants and prostheses<br />
is already evident. Fig. 5.19 shows a mandible made using SLM TM whilst<br />
Fig. 5.20 shows a partial removable denture framework (described in detail<br />
in Section 6.14 Rehabilitation applications case study 7). <strong>The</strong>y also lend<br />
themselves well to the manufacture <strong>of</strong> custom surgical guides, templates<br />
and instruments, as described in Section 6.6 Surgical application case study<br />
4. <strong>The</strong> similar Arcam CAD to Metal ® process (Arcam AB (publ.), Krokslätts<br />
Fabriker 30, SE-431 37 Mölndal, Sweden) utilises an electron beam to melt<br />
Table 5.4 <strong>Adv</strong>antages and disadvantages <strong>of</strong> LS<br />
<strong>Adv</strong>antages Disadvantages<br />
Strong, tough models High cost <strong>of</strong> machine and materials<br />
Reasonably accurate Large machine, nitrogen supply, water cooling<br />
Wide range <strong>of</strong> materials Heat up and cool down time<br />
Poor surface fi nish<br />
Materials not suited to sterilisation