R_Bibb_Medical_Modelling_The_Application_of_Adv.pdf
R_Bibb_Medical_Modelling_The_Application_of_Adv.pdf
R_Bibb_Medical_Modelling_The_Application_of_Adv.pdf
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
142 <strong>Medical</strong> modelling<br />
defect (5). Titanium is an inert and widely used material (6, 7), but in its<br />
pre-formed presentation can be cumbersome for use in the orbital fl oor<br />
and, if it has to be removed, it can present an operative challenge.<br />
Continued development in computer-aided diagnosis and management<br />
and construction <strong>of</strong> stereolithographic models <strong>of</strong>fers unparalleled reproduction<br />
<strong>of</strong> anatomical detail (8, 9). This technology is described in relation<br />
to planning in trauma surgery (10) and to planning for ablative surgery<br />
for malignancies <strong>of</strong> the head and neck (surgery to remove cancer) (11, 12).<br />
Construction <strong>of</strong> custom-made orbital fl oor implants is possible (13, 14),<br />
although the material <strong>of</strong> choice is debated.<br />
We describe a simple technique for construction <strong>of</strong> custom-made titanium<br />
orbital fl oor implants using easily available laboratory techniques<br />
combined with stereolithography models. We estimate the implant construction<br />
cost at around £300. This is largely accounted for by the cost <strong>of</strong><br />
producing the model which, depending on the height <strong>of</strong> orbital contour<br />
required on the model, varies between £200 and £300. <strong>The</strong> making <strong>of</strong> the<br />
implant takes about two hours <strong>of</strong> a maxill<strong>of</strong>acial technician’s time and<br />
the medical grade titanium sheet costs only a few pounds. This compares<br />
favourably with some <strong>of</strong> the newer alloplastic materials. <strong>The</strong> cost would<br />
drop substantially with greater use <strong>of</strong> the technique and, when reduced<br />
operating time is taken into account, the cost comparison is more<br />
favourable.<br />
6.5.3 Technique<br />
Imaging<br />
<strong>The</strong> detail given here is specifi c to this case; a more general overview <strong>of</strong> CT<br />
scanning is given in Section 2.2. Scanning protocols are observed to minimise<br />
the dose <strong>of</strong> ionising radiation to orbital tissues (15). Maximum detail<br />
can be obtained scanning with a 0.5 mm collimation, but the 77 % increase<br />
in dosage when compared to using a 1 mm collimation may not be justifi ed.<br />
We use a Siemens Somatom Plus-4 Volume Zoom scanner with these<br />
settings: 140 kV, 120 mAs, 1 mm collimation, 3.5 feed per rotation, 0.75<br />
rotation time, giving a displayed dose <strong>of</strong> 45 mGy/100 mAs (Siemens AG,<br />
Wittelsbacherplatz 2, D80333, Munich, Germany). Data are reconstructed<br />
using 1 mm slices with 0.5 mm increment (50 % overlap) and smooth kernel.<br />
Sharp reconstruction kernels normally associated with CT imaging <strong>of</strong> bony<br />
anatomy introduce an artifi cial enhancement <strong>of</strong> the edge. If used as part <strong>of</strong><br />
a three-dimensional volume based on selection <strong>of</strong> specifi c Hounsfi eld<br />
values, the enhancement artefact will be included with the bony detail, so<br />
degrading the image. <strong>The</strong> data obtained can be used to construct sharp