28.02.2013 Views

R_Bibb_Medical_Modelling_The_Application_of_Adv.pdf

R_Bibb_Medical_Modelling_The_Application_of_Adv.pdf

R_Bibb_Medical_Modelling_The_Application_of_Adv.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Case studies 141<br />

9. Robinson R P, Clark J E (1996), ‘Uncemented press-fi t total hip arthroplasty<br />

using the Identifi t custom-molding technique; a prospective minimum 2-year<br />

follow-up study’, Journal <strong>of</strong> Arthroplasty, 11, 247–54.<br />

10. Shaw N J, Minns R J, Epstein H P, Sutton R A (1997), ‘Early results <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Minns meniscal bearing total knee prosthesis’, <strong>The</strong> Knee, 4, 185–91.<br />

6.5 Surgical applications case study 3: <strong>The</strong><br />

custom-made titanium orbital fl oor prosthesis<br />

in reconstruction <strong>of</strong> orbital fl oor fractures<br />

6.5.1 Acknowledgements<br />

<strong>The</strong> work described in this case study was fi rst reported in the reference<br />

below and is reproduced here in part or in full with the permission <strong>of</strong> the<br />

British Association <strong>of</strong> Oral and Maxill<strong>of</strong>acial Surgeons.<br />

• Hughes CW, Page K, <strong>Bibb</strong> R, Taylor J, Revington P (2003), ‘<strong>The</strong><br />

custom-made titanium orbital fl oor prosthesis in reconstruction for<br />

orbital fl oor fractures’, British Journal <strong>of</strong> Oral and Maxill<strong>of</strong>acial Surgery,<br />

41 (1), 50–53.<br />

No fi nancial support was given. <strong>The</strong> National Centre for Product Design &<br />

Development Research (PDR) supplied the stereolithography model used<br />

in making the prosthesis.<br />

6.5.2 Introduction<br />

Few anatomical sites <strong>of</strong> such diminutive size have attracted so much variation<br />

in treatment as the orbital fl oor (the bottom <strong>of</strong> the eye socket) and its<br />

related fractures. <strong>The</strong> range <strong>of</strong> implant material in reconstruction following<br />

blow out fracture <strong>of</strong> the orbit is extensive and the decision as to which<br />

material is used remains debated (1).<br />

Autologous materials (those derived from human tissues) <strong>of</strong>fer clear<br />

advantages with cartilage, calvarial bone, antral bone, rib and illium having<br />

been described (1). <strong>The</strong>se grafts <strong>of</strong>fer uncertain longevity and result in<br />

tissue damage at the donor site. Artifi cial materials such as Silastic ® (Dow<br />

Corning Corporation, Auburn Plant, 5300 11 Mile Road, Auburn, MI<br />

48611, USA) have the longest track record, but a well-documented complication<br />

rate related in particular to extrusion <strong>of</strong> the graft (2). Other artifi cial<br />

materials such as polyethylene sheeting (Medpor ® , Porex Surgical Products<br />

Group USA, Porex Surgical, Inc, 15 Dart Road, Newnan, GA 30265-1017,<br />

USA) are reported to give satisfactory results (3), and newer resorbable<br />

materials such as polydioxanone are another option (4). <strong>The</strong> role <strong>of</strong> bioactive<br />

glass is more recently reported, but its use is limited by the size <strong>of</strong> the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!