28.02.2013 Views

R_Bibb_Medical_Modelling_The_Application_of_Adv.pdf

R_Bibb_Medical_Modelling_The_Application_of_Adv.pdf

R_Bibb_Medical_Modelling_The_Application_of_Adv.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Case studies 247<br />

supports became available. Although they would have been an improvement<br />

in this respect, they would still have resulted in an excessive number<br />

<strong>of</strong> supports with an even larger support STL fi le.)<br />

To avoid these problems, a novel strategy for producing the necessary<br />

support was attempted. <strong>The</strong> approach was based on two fundamental<br />

assumptions. Firstly, as bone is a naturally occurring, load bearing structure<br />

it is made up <strong>of</strong> self-supporting arches. <strong>The</strong>refore, the structure should, in<br />

theory, support itself except for the sides <strong>of</strong> the model where the structure<br />

has been sliced through. <strong>The</strong> second assumption was that the open spaces<br />

would all be inter-communicating and, therefore, there would be no ‘trapped<br />

volumes’ (a recognised problem in stereolithography).<br />

As automatically generated supports were impractical, a very thin crate<br />

was designed using CAD that would support the sides and base <strong>of</strong> the<br />

model yet still allow good draining, see Fig. 6.94. This is necessary to avoid<br />

the ‘trapped volume’ effect that adversely affects the stereolithography<br />

process. <strong>The</strong> crate was then exported as an STL fi le. Curtain support structures<br />

were then automatically generated (using 3D Lightyear TM , 3D Systems<br />

6.94 <strong>The</strong> crate structure.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!