R_Bibb_Medical_Modelling_The_Application_of_Adv.pdf
R_Bibb_Medical_Modelling_The_Application_of_Adv.pdf
R_Bibb_Medical_Modelling_The_Application_of_Adv.pdf
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Case studies 245<br />
micro-computed tomography, was used to perform fi nite element analysis<br />
(FEA) on the structure <strong>of</strong> various human and animal bones. <strong>The</strong> physical<br />
models were required to validate the results <strong>of</strong> the FEA.<br />
<strong>The</strong> diffi culties encountered in creating physical models <strong>of</strong> these structures<br />
arose from the nature <strong>of</strong> the structure. Not only does the highly<br />
complex porous structure result in extremely large computer fi les but it also<br />
presents problems <strong>of</strong> support during the build process.<br />
6.15.3 Human sample data<br />
<strong>The</strong> techniques <strong>of</strong> serial sectioning and micro-computed tomography (µCT)<br />
reconstruction were used to obtain three-dimensional reconstructions <strong>of</strong> in<br />
vitro samples <strong>of</strong> natural cancellous bone tissue. <strong>The</strong> physical size <strong>of</strong> each<br />
sample is approximately 4 mm × 4 mm × 4 mm and their relative densities<br />
are 9–25 %. <strong>The</strong> models were to be scaled up by an approximate factor <strong>of</strong><br />
ten and physically produced using RP. <strong>The</strong> considerable effort that went in<br />
to generating the data from which these models would be made is described<br />
elsewhere (1).<br />
6.15.4 <strong>The</strong> use <strong>of</strong> stereolithography in the study <strong>of</strong><br />
cancellous bone<br />
For this project, stereolithography (SL) was the preferred method for<br />
several essential reasons. Firstly, it is capable <strong>of</strong> building models at an exact<br />
layer thickness <strong>of</strong> 0.1 mm. This was desirable as the FEA was generated<br />
from voxel data with a voxel size <strong>of</strong> 0.1 mm. <strong>The</strong>refore, the SL model would<br />
replicate the FEA mesh exactly, i.e. with no smoothing between the layers<br />
or within the plane <strong>of</strong> each slice. Secondly, it is the most accurate method<br />
available (except Solidscape machines, but this would have been extremely<br />
slow and the models would have proved far too delicate to mechanically<br />
test). Thirdly, although Selective Laser Sintering (SLS ® – 3D Systems Inc.,<br />
26081 Avenue Hall, Valencia, CA 91355, USA) and three-dimensional<br />
printing had the advantage <strong>of</strong> not requiring support structures the fi nished<br />
models are not completely dense or suffi ciently accurate. Fused Deposition<br />
<strong>Modelling</strong> (FDM TM – Stratasys Inc., 14950 Mantin Drive, Eden Prairie, MN<br />
55344-2020, USA) parts can also show a small degree <strong>of</strong> porosity and are<br />
unable to match the accuracy desired in this case. However, since these<br />
models were built, the water-soluble supports that are now available for<br />
FDM TM would prove extremely useful for structures such as these. Finally,<br />
and most importantly, stereolithography could be used to generate models<br />
from slice data rather than triangular faceted data. <strong>The</strong> intention was to<br />
use the SLC fi le format as it resulted in dramatically smaller fi les than the<br />
same data generated in the STL fi le format. A general description <strong>of</strong> all <strong>of</strong>