28.02.2013 Views

R_Bibb_Medical_Modelling_The_Application_of_Adv.pdf

R_Bibb_Medical_Modelling_The_Application_of_Adv.pdf

R_Bibb_Medical_Modelling_The_Application_of_Adv.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Medical</strong> imaging for rapid prototyping 23<br />

three-dimensional series scans, the data should be continuous. Noncontinuous<br />

sets <strong>of</strong> data may be satisfactorily combined in s<strong>of</strong>tware later,<br />

however as the patient has usually shifted position slightly and the separate<br />

series may not align perfectly.<br />

2.3.3 Missing data<br />

Even with a very small scan distance, some detail may be lost where thin<br />

sections <strong>of</strong> tissue exist between the scan planes. In addition, parts that are<br />

very small or connected only by thin sections may not survive the build<br />

process.<br />

Due to the time taken to acquire each image, fl owing fl uids will have<br />

moved between the excitation and emission stages <strong>of</strong> the scan. With multiple<br />

images being taken, this may result in the signal being reduced or reinforced.<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore, blood vessels, for example, may appear too dark or too<br />

bright.<br />

2.3.4 Scan distance<br />

This is the distance between the scans taken to form the three-dimensional<br />

scan series (unlike CT data capture is not limited to the axial plane), and<br />

it may also be referred to as ‘pitch’ or ‘distance between cuts’. To maximise<br />

the data available to produce a smooth model this distance should be minimised.<br />

Typically, distances <strong>of</strong> 1–1.5 mm produce good results. A scan distance<br />

greater than 2 mm will give increasingly poor results as the scan<br />

distance increases. However, taking thinner slices results in less signal<br />

strength per pixel being detected by the scanner. <strong>The</strong>refore, more echoes<br />

are required to boost the signal strength, resulting in signifi cantly longer<br />

scan times.<br />

Unlike most CT scanners, the number <strong>of</strong> pixels used in a cross section<br />

is a variable parameter. Typically, the cross section will be broken down<br />

in to a relatively small number <strong>of</strong> larger pixels compared to CT. For<br />

example, a typical CT image may be 512 × 512 pixels at a pixel size <strong>of</strong><br />

0.5 mm, whereas an MR image may be 256 × 256 pixels at a pixel size <strong>of</strong><br />

1 mm. <strong>The</strong> main reason for this is to maintain signal strength. A larger<br />

number <strong>of</strong> smaller pixels results in less signal strength per pixel. Once again,<br />

therefore, more echoes are required to boost the signal strength, increasing<br />

scan times.<br />

For three-dimensional modelling, it may be necessary to alter the compromise<br />

between scan time and signal strength compared with the protocols<br />

normally used for imaging only. MR is <strong>of</strong>ten a preferred imaging methodology<br />

due to its inherent safety compared to CT. However, the application<br />

<strong>of</strong> MR for three-dimensional modelling should be carefully considered due<br />

to the increased scan times. Although MR is safe, the procedure may

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!