28.02.2013 Views

R_Bibb_Medical_Modelling_The_Application_of_Adv.pdf

R_Bibb_Medical_Modelling_The_Application_of_Adv.pdf

R_Bibb_Medical_Modelling_The_Application_of_Adv.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

152 <strong>Medical</strong> modelling<br />

316L stainless steel spherical powder with a maximum particle size <strong>of</strong><br />

0.045 mm (particle size range 0.005–0.045 mm) and a mean particle size <strong>of</strong><br />

approximately 0.025 mm (Sandvik Osprey Ltd, Red Jacket Works, Milland<br />

Road, Neath, SA11 1NJ, United Kingdom, www.smt.sandvik.com/osprey).<br />

<strong>The</strong> laser had a maximum scan speed <strong>of</strong> 300 mm/s and a beam diameter<br />

0.150–0.200 mm.<br />

Step 4: Finishing<br />

Initially, supporting structures were removed using a Dremel ® hand-held<br />

power tool (Robert Bosch Tool Corporation, 4915 21st Street, Racine, WI<br />

53406, USA) using a reinforced cutting wheel (Dremel, Reinforced Cutting<br />

Disc, Ref. number 426). However, more recently, improved design <strong>of</strong> the<br />

supports has eliminated the need for cutting tools as the supports contact<br />

the part at a sharp point that can easily be broken away from it.<br />

<strong>The</strong> SLM TM parts described here were well formed with little evidence<br />

<strong>of</strong> the stair stepping effect (resulting from the thin layers used) but showed<br />

a fi ne surface roughness. This roughness was easily removed by bead blasting<br />

to leave a smooth, matte fi nish surface. <strong>The</strong> parts were then sent to the<br />

hospital for cleaning and sterilisation by autoclave.<br />

6.6.4 Case study<br />

Although surgical guides have been produced using RP techniques for<br />

some years, the application <strong>of</strong> surgical guides to osteotomies had not been<br />

previously attempted. This case was the fi rst attempt at such a guide. <strong>The</strong><br />

surgery performed in this particular case involved distraction osteogenesis<br />

to correct deformity resulting from cleft palate. A description <strong>of</strong> distraction<br />

osteogenesis is given in medical explanatory note 8.2.3. This required a Le<br />

Fort 1 osteotomy, which is a cut across the maxilla above the roots <strong>of</strong> the<br />

teeth but under the nose in order to separate and move the upper jaw in<br />

relation to the rest <strong>of</strong> the skull. <strong>The</strong> maxilla is then gradually moved in<br />

relation to the rest <strong>of</strong> the skull, usually forwards, by mounting it on two<br />

devices that use precision screw threads to advance the position by a small<br />

increment each day. <strong>The</strong> small increment causes the bone to grow gradually<br />

so that the shape <strong>of</strong> the face can be altered. When the desired position is<br />

reached, the bone is allowed to heal completely to give strong and reshaped<br />

skeletal anatomy.<br />

In this case, it was also the intention to include the drilling holes for the<br />

distraction devices as well as a slot for the osteotomy. <strong>The</strong> slot was then<br />

made suffi ciently wide to allow the saw blade to move freely and to enable<br />

suffi cient irrigation during the cutting. <strong>The</strong> lower edge <strong>of</strong> the slot is made<br />

fl at and parallel to the direction <strong>of</strong> the cut in order to provide a reference

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!