Ikelic - Alliance Digital Repository
Ikelic - Alliance Digital Repository
Ikelic - Alliance Digital Repository
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
COAL<br />
selected power generation, C02 capture options,<br />
and C02 disposal options were evaluated. The<br />
most promising options will be selected for more<br />
detailed appraisal as components of a number of<br />
Full Fuel Cycles for power generation.<br />
Four power generation schemes were studied:<br />
- A<br />
- A<br />
- An<br />
modern pulverized coal-fired plant<br />
equipped with flue gas desulfurization<br />
facilities and operating with a subcritical<br />
high temperature steam cycle<br />
(PF+FGD).<br />
modern natural gas-fired combined<br />
cycle in which gas is fired into gas tur<br />
bines with a steam turbine also incor<br />
porated into the cycle (GTCC).<br />
Integrated Gasification Combined<br />
Cycle (IGCC) in which a coal slurry is fed<br />
to an oxygen-blown gasifier of the<br />
entrained-flow type.<br />
TABLE 1<br />
- Power<br />
generation based on a scheme of<br />
burning pulverized coal in oxygen using<br />
recycled to moderate the combus<br />
C02<br />
tion temperature (CO, Recycle). The<br />
technology has not been extensively<br />
demonstrated and must therefore be<br />
regarded as Long Term.<br />
The four schemes were selected to represent a<br />
wide range of C02 concentrations and conditions<br />
in the exhaust gas.<br />
The studies concentrate on the overall impact of<br />
capture processes (for specifically removing or<br />
isolating C02)<br />
on power generation. The com<br />
bined power generation and scrubbing plant<br />
should have a net output of 500 megawatts (e).<br />
Using solvent absorption of from the flue<br />
C02<br />
gas, figures arrived at for the cost incurred per<br />
tonne of C02 release to atmosphere avoided,<br />
range from $16 to $87 per tonne (Table 1). They<br />
do not include the cost of C02 liquefaction and<br />
disposal.<br />
CARBON DIOXIDE RELEASES AND COST OF AVOIDANCE<br />
(Efficiencies as %LHV)<br />
CO, IGCC<br />
PF+FGD GTCC IQQC Recvcle Selexol<br />
Reference Efficiency 40 52 42 33 42<br />
Efficiency After Capture 29 42 28 30 36<br />
CO Captured (%) 90 85 90 99 82<br />
C02 in Product (%)<br />
Cost Avoided C02 ($/tonne)<br />
Power Cost (ref . mills/kWh)<br />
99.2<br />
35<br />
49<br />
99.4<br />
55<br />
35<br />
99.8<br />
87<br />
53<br />
99.9<br />
16<br />
78<br />
96<br />
23<br />
53<br />
Power cost (mills/kWh)<br />
Specific Investment Cost ($/kW)<br />
74 53 112 94 63<br />
Reference Case 1,058 702 1,561 2,044 1,561<br />
Removal Case 1,842 1,367 3,254 3,102 2,400<br />
4-40<br />
THE SYNTHETIC FUELS REPORT, JANUARY 1995