02.03.2013 Views

Ikelic - Alliance Digital Repository

Ikelic - Alliance Digital Repository

Ikelic - Alliance Digital Repository

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

STATUS OF OIL SHALE PROJECTS (Underline denotes changes since June 1994)<br />

COMMERCIAL PROJECTS (Continued)<br />

PAMA has been developing a Fast-Heating Retorting Process, using hot recycled ash as the heat carrier. Tests have been<br />

carried out in a 50 kilogram per hour experimental unit. Work has been started on a 6 ton per hour pilot plant, with startup<br />

scheduled for mid-1996.<br />

Project Cost: $30 million for combustion demonstration plant<br />

$8 million for retorting pilot plant<br />

PARACHUTE CREEK - SHALE OIL PROJECT UNOCAL<br />

Corporation (S-160)<br />

In 1920 Unocal began acquiring oil shale properties in the Parachute Creek area of Garfield County, Colorado. The<br />

49,000 acres of oil shale lands Unocal owns contain over three billion barrels of recoverable oil in the high-yield Mahogany<br />

Zone alone. Since the early 1940s, Unocal research scientists and engineers have conducted a wide variety of laboratory and<br />

field studies for developing feasible methods of producing usable oils from shale. In the 1940s, Unocal operated a small 50 ton<br />

per day pilot retort at its Los Angeles, California refinery. From 1955 to 1958, Unocal built and operated an upflow retort at<br />

the Parachute site, processing up to 1,200 tons of ore per day and producing up to 800 barrels of shale oil per day.<br />

Unocal began the permitting process for its Phase I 10,000 barrel per day project in March 1978. All federal, state, and local<br />

permits were received by early 1981. Necessary road work began in the Fall 1980. Construction of a 12,500 ton per day mine<br />

began in January 1981, and construction of the retort started in late 1981. Concurrently, work proceeded on a 10,000 barrels<br />

per day upgrading facility, which would convert the raw shale oil to a high quality syncrude.<br />

Construction concluded and the operations group assumed control of the project in the Fall 1983. After several years of test<br />

operations and resulting modifications, Unocal began shipping upgraded syncrude on December 23, 1986.<br />

In July 1981, the company was awarded a contract under a United States Department of Energy (DOE) program designed to<br />

encourage commercial shale oil production in the United States. The price was to be the market price or a contract floor<br />

price. If the market price is below the DOE contract floor price, indexed for inflation, Unocal would receive a payment from<br />

DOE to equal the difference. The total amount of DOE price supports Unocal could receive was $400 million. Unocal began<br />

billing the U.S. Treasury Department in January, 1987 under its Phase I support contract.<br />

In a 1985 amendment to the DOE Phase I contract, Unocal agreed to explore using fluidized bed combustion (FBC) technol<br />

ogy at its shale plant. In June 1987, Unocal informed the U.S. Treasury Department that it would not proceed with the FBC<br />

technology. A key reason for the decision, the company said, was the unexpectedly high cost of the FBC facility.<br />

In 1989, a new crusher system was installed which produces a smaller and more uniform particle size to the retort. Also, retort<br />

operations were modified and the retorting temperature increased. As a result, production in November and December<br />

reached approximately 7,000 barrels per day.<br />

At year-end 1990, Unocal had shipped over 4.5 million barrels of syncrude from its Parachute Creek Project. Unocal an<br />

nounced the shale project booked its first profitable quarter for the first calendar quarter of 1990. Positive cash flow had been<br />

achieved previously for select monthly periods; however, this quarter's profit was the first sustained period of profitability.<br />

Cost cutting efforts further lowered the breakeven point on operating costs approximately 20 percent.<br />

In 1990, the United States Department of Treasury found no significant environmental, health or safety impacts related to the<br />

operations of Parachute Creek. Monitoring will continue through 1992.<br />

On March 26, 1991, Unocal announced that production operations at the facility would be suspended because of failure to con<br />

sistently reach the financial break-even point. Production ended June 1, 1991 and the project has been terminated.<br />

-<br />

Project Cost: Phase I Approximately $1.2 billion<br />

- PETROSIX Petrobras<br />

(Petroleo Brasileiro, SA.) (S-170)<br />

A 6 foot inside diameter retort, called the demonstration plant, has been in continuous operation since 1984. The plant is used<br />

for optimization of the Petrosix technology. Oil shales from other mines can be processed in this plant to obtain data for the<br />

basic design of new commercial plants.<br />

A Petrosix pilot plant, having an 8 inch inside diameter retort, has been in operation since 1982. The plant is used for oil shale<br />

characterization and retorting tests and developing data for economic evaluation of new commercial plants.<br />

An entrained bed pilot plant has been in operation since 1980. It is used to develop a process for the oil shale fines. The plant<br />

uses a 6 inch inside diameter pipe (reactor) externally heated. Studies at the pilot scale have been concluded.<br />

2-30<br />

SYNTHETIC FUELS REPORT, JANUARY 1995

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!