02.03.2013 Views

Ikelic - Alliance Digital Repository

Ikelic - Alliance Digital Repository

Ikelic - Alliance Digital Repository

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

STATUS OF OIL SHALE PROJECTS (Underline denotes changes since June 1994)<br />

COMMERCIAL PROJECTS (Continued)<br />

Raw shale oil from the retort would require further treatment to produce a compatible oil refinery feedstock. Two<br />

41,000 barrels per day upgrading plants are incorporated into the project design.<br />

All aspects of infrastructure supporting such a project were studied, including water and power supplies, work force accom<br />

modation, community services and product transportation. A 110 kilometer pipeline to the port of Mackay is favored for trans<br />

fer of product oil from the plant site to marine tankers. The study indicated that there were no foreseeable infrastructure or<br />

environmental issues which would impede development.<br />

Market studies suggested that refiners in both Australia and Japan would place a premium on Condor shale oil of about US$4<br />

per barrel over Arabian Light crude. Average cash operating cost at full production was estimated at US$20 per barrel of<br />

which more than US$9 per barrel represents corporation taxes and royalty.<br />

During July 1984 SPP, CPM, and JAOSCO signed an agreement with Japan Oil Shale Engineering Corporation (JOSECO).<br />

JOSECO is a separate consortium of thirty-six Japanese companies established with the purpose of studying oil shale and<br />

developing oil shale processing technology. Under the agreement, SPP/CPM mined 39,000 tons of oil shale from the Condor<br />

deposit, crushed it to produce 20,000 tons and shipped it to Japan in late 1984.<br />

JOSECO commissioned a 250 tonne per day pilot plant in Kyushu in early 1987. The Condor shale sample was processed satis<br />

factorily in the pilot unit.<br />

In 1988 SPP/CPM began studies to assess the feasibility of establishing a semi-commercial demonstration plant at<br />

retorting<br />

Condor similar to that being designed for the Stuart deposit. Samples of Condor shale were shipped to Canada for testing in<br />

the Taciuk process.<br />

Project Cost: $2.3 billion (mid-1983 U.S. dollars)<br />

- ESPERANCE OIL SHALE PROJECT Esperance<br />

Minerals NL and Greenvale Mining NL (S-70)<br />

In 1991 Esperance Minerals and Greenvale Mining announced they are planning to produce 200,000 tons per year of<br />

"asphaltine"<br />

for bitumen from the Alpha torbanite deposit in Queensland, Australia. The two companies believe they can<br />

produce bitumen that will sell for more than US$80 per barrel.<br />

The Alpha field contains about 90 million barrels of reserves, but the shale in this deposit has a high yield of 88 to 132 gallons<br />

of oil per ton of shale.<br />

Recent studies have concluded that using new technologies to produce a bitumen-based product mix would be the most<br />

economically beneficial. Byproducts could include diesel fuel and aromatics.<br />

ESTONIA POWERPLANTS - Estonian<br />

Republic (S-80)<br />

Two oil shale-fueled powerplants, the Baltic with a capacity of 1,435 megawatts and the Estonian with a capacity of<br />

1,600 megawatts, are in operation in the Estonia. These were the first of their kind to be put into operation.<br />

About 95 percent of the oil shale output from the former USSR comes from Estonia and the Leningrad districts of Russia.<br />

Half of the extracted oil shale comes from surface mines, the other half from underground workings. Each of the nine under<br />

ground mines outputs 3,000 to 17,000 tons per day, each of the surface mines outputs 8,000 to 14,000 tons per day.<br />

Exploitation of kukersite (Baltic oil shale) resources was begun by the Estonian government in 1918. In 1980, annual produc<br />

tion of oil shale in the USSR reached 37 million tons of which 36 million tons come from the Baltic region. Recovered energy<br />

from oil shale was equivalent to the energy in 49 million barrels of oil. Most extracted oil shale is used for power production<br />

rather than oil recovery. In 1989, annual production of oil shale in the Baltic region was as low as 28 million tons. In 1993. an<br />

nual production of oil shale in Estonia was 16.5 million tons. About 10 million tons were extracted from six underground<br />

mines and about 9 million tons from three open pit mines. The annual output from the underground mines ranged from<br />

600,000 to 4.3 million tons, while the output from the surface mines ranged from 2.0 to 4.3 million tons. The recovered energy<br />

from this oil shale was the energy equivalent of 25 million barrels of oil.<br />

Most extracted oil shale (85 percent) is used for power production rather than oil recovery. More than 60 percent of Estonia's<br />

thermal energy demand is met by the use of oil shale. Fuel gas production was terminated in 1987.<br />

Pulverized oil shale ash is being used in the cement industry and for acid soil melioration.<br />

2-26<br />

SYNTHETIC FUELS REPORT. JANUARY 1995

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!