Ikelic - Alliance Digital Repository
Ikelic - Alliance Digital Repository
Ikelic - Alliance Digital Repository
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
- ACORN PROJECT (See<br />
STATUS OF OIL SHALE PROJECTS<br />
COMMERCIAL PROJECTS (Underline denotes changes since June 1994)<br />
Stuart Oil Shale Project)<br />
- CHATHAM CO-COMBUSTION BOILER New<br />
Brunswick Electric Power Commission (S-30)<br />
Construction on the Chatham circulating bed demonstration project was completed in 1986 with commissioning of the new<br />
boiler. A joint venture of Energy, Mines and Resources Canada and the New Brunswick Electric Power Commission, this<br />
project consists of a circulating fluidized-bed boiler of Lurgi design that supplies steam to an existing 22-MW turbine genera<br />
tor. High-sulfur coal was co-combusted with carbonate oil shales and also with limestone to compare the power generation and<br />
economics of the two cocombustants in the reduction of sulfur emissions. A full capacity performance-guarantee test was<br />
carried out in May 1987, on coal, lime and oil shale. Testing with oil shale in 1988 showed shale to be as effective as limestone<br />
per unit of calcium contained. However, bulk quantities of oil shale were found to have a lower calcium content than had been<br />
expected from early samples. No further oil shale testing is planned until further evaluations are completed.<br />
Since January 1993, the unit has been operated as a stand-by unit on coal and limestone. It is also available for co-combustion<br />
tests if desired.<br />
- CLEAR CREEK PROJECT Chevron<br />
Shale Oil Company (70 percent) and Conoco, Inc. (30 percent) (S-40)<br />
Chevron and Conoco successfully completed the operation of their 350 tons per day semi-works plant during 1985. This facility,<br />
which was constructed on property adjacent to the Chevron Refinery in Salt Lake City, Utah, was designed to test Chevron<br />
Research Company's Staged Turbulent Bed (STB) retort process. Information obtained from the semi-works project would al<br />
low Chevron and Conoco to proceed with developing a commercial shale oil operation in the future when economic conditions<br />
so dictate.<br />
Chevron and Conoco have joined with Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), DOE and other industrial parties to<br />
participate in a 3 year R&D project involving LLNL's Hot Recycled Solids oil shale process. Information obtained from this<br />
project may result in refinements to the STB process.<br />
Chevron is continuing to develop and protect its conditional water rights for use in future shale oil operations at its Clear<br />
Creek and Parachute Creek properties.<br />
- Project Cost: Semi-Works Estimated at $130 million<br />
- CONDOR PROJECT Central<br />
- - Pacific Minerals 50 percent; Southern Pacific Petroleum 50 percent (S-60)<br />
Southern Pacific Petroleum N.L. and Central Pacific Minerals N.L. (SPP/CPM) announced the completion on June 30, 1984 of<br />
the Condor Oil Shale Joint Feasibility Study. SPP/CPM believe that the results of the study support a conclusion that a<br />
development of the Condor oil shale deposit would be feasible under the assumptions incorporated in the study.<br />
Under an agreement signed in 1981 between SPP/CPM and Japan Australia Oil Shale Corporation (JAOSCO), the Japanese<br />
partner funded the Joint Feasibility Study. JAOSCO consists of the Japan National Oil Corporation and 40 major Japanese<br />
companies. The 28 month was study conducted by an engineering team staffed equally by the Japanese and Australian par<br />
ticipants and supported by independent international contractors and engineers.<br />
From a range of alternatives considered, a project configuration producing 26.7 million barrels per year of sweet shale oil gave<br />
the best economic conclusions. The study indicated that such a plant would have involved a capital cost of US$2,300 million<br />
and an annual average operating cost of US$265 million at full production, before tax and royalty. (All figures are based on<br />
mid-1983 dollars.) Such a project was estimated to require 12 years to design and complete construction with first product oil<br />
in year 6, and progressive build-up to full production in three further stages at two-year intervals.<br />
The exploration drilling program determined that the Condor main oil shale seam contains at least 8,100 million barrels of oil<br />
in situ, measured at a cut-off grade of 50 liters per ton on a dry basis. The case study project would utilize only 600 million bar<br />
rels, over a nominal 32 year life. The deposit is amenable to open pit mining by large face shovels, feeding to trucks and in-pit<br />
breakers, and then by conveyor to surface stockpiles. Spent shale is returned by conveyor initially to surface dumps, and later<br />
back into the pit.<br />
Following a survey of available retorting technologies, several proprietary processes were selected for detailed investigation.<br />
Pilot plant trials enabled detailed engineering schemes to be developed for each process. Pilot plant testing of Condor oil shale<br />
indicated promising results from the "fines"<br />
process owned by Lurgi GmbH of Frankfurt, West Germany. Their proposal en<br />
visages four retort modules, each processing 50,000 tons per day of shale, to give a total capacity of 200,000 tons per day and a<br />
sweet shale oil output, after upgrading, of 82,100 barrels per day.<br />
2-25<br />
SYNTHETIC FUELS REPORT, JANUARY 1995