02.03.2013 Views

Ikelic - Alliance Digital Repository

Ikelic - Alliance Digital Repository

Ikelic - Alliance Digital Repository

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

STATUS OF OIL SHALE PROJECTS (Underline denotes changes since June 1994)<br />

COMMERCIAL PROJECTS (Continued)<br />

In November 1986, Ramex announced that Greenway Corporation had become the controlling shareholder in the company.<br />

On November 24, 1987, Ramex announced the completion of the Rock Springs pilot project. The formation was heated to ap<br />

a high-BTU gas with little or no liquid condensate. The wells sustained 75 Mcf a day, for a<br />

proximately 1200 degrees F creating<br />

period of 3 months, then were shut down to evaluate the heaters and the metals used in the manufacturing of the heaters. The test<br />

results indicated a 5 year life in a 10 foot section of the shale with a product gas of 800 BTU, or higher, per standard cubic foot.<br />

Ramex also announced in November 1987 the start of a commercial production program in the devonian shale in the eastern states<br />

of Kentucky and Tennessee. In April 1988, however, Ramex moved the project to Indiana. A total of 7 wells were drilled. Gas<br />

tests resulted in ratings of 1,034 and 968 BTU. Two production volume tests showed 14,000 and 24,000 cubic feet per day.<br />

In late July, 1988 a letter agreement was signed between Tri-Gas Technology, Inc., the licensee of the Ramex process in Indiana,<br />

and J. M. Slaughter Oil Company of Ft. Worth, Texas to provide funding for drilling a minimum of 20 gas wells, using the Ramex<br />

oil shale gasification process, on the leases near Henryville, Indiana. Arrangements were made with Midwest Natural Gas to hook<br />

up the Ramex gas production to the Midwest Pipeline near Henryville.<br />

As of May, 1989 Ramex had been unsuccessful in sustaining long-term burns. They therefore redesigned the burner and built a<br />

much larger model (600,000 BTU per hour vs 40,000 BTU per hour) for installation at the Henryville site. In November, 1989<br />

Ramex completed its field test of the Devonian Shales in Indiana. The test showed a gas analysis of 47 percent hydrogen,<br />

30 percent methane and little or no sulfur. Ramex contracted with a major research firm to complete the design and material<br />

selection of its commercial burners which they say are 40 to 50 percent more fuel efficient than most similar industrial units and<br />

also to develop flow measurement equipment for the project. Ramex received a patent on its process on May 29, 1990.<br />

In 1990, Ramex also began investigating potential applications in Israel.<br />

Ramex contracted with the Institute of Gas Technology in 1990 for controlled testing of its in situ process because the company's<br />

field tests of the process in wells in Indiana have been thwarted by ground water incursion problems. Questions that still need to<br />

be answered before the Ramex process can be commercialized are:<br />

How fast does the heat front move through the shale?<br />

How far will the reaction go from the heat source and how much heat is necessary on an incremental basis to keep<br />

the reaction zone moving outward from the source of heat?<br />

What is the exact chemical composition of the gas that is produced from the process over a period of time and does<br />

the composition change with varying amounts of heat and if so, what is the ideal amount of heat to produce the most<br />

desirable chemical composition of gas?<br />

Once these questions are answered, the will company be able to calculate the actual cost per unit of gas production.<br />

In 1992 Ramex announced a company reorganization and said that new laboratory tests were being arranged to improve its technol<br />

ogy.<br />

On September 30, 1993, Ramex Synfuels International, Inc., as sponsor of a private placement of limited partnership interests in<br />

Ramex Research Partners, Ltd. successfully closed an offering at the minimum amount intended to be sold of $110,000. Subse<br />

quently, a contract to conduct Phase I laboratory was signed testing between Ramex and Southwest Research Institute of San An<br />

tonio. Texas. These tests have been ongoing during 1994. with the final Phase I test to be conducted in December 1994. A final<br />

report on all Phase I tests will be issued by SwRJ in January or February 1995.<br />

Project Cost: Approximately $1 million for the pilot tests.<br />

RIO BLANCO OIL SHALE PROJECT - Rio Blanco Oil Shale Company (wholly owned by Amoco Corporation) (S-190)<br />

The proposed project is on federal Tract C-a in Piceance Creek Basin, Colorado. A bonus bid of $210.3 million was submitted to<br />

acquire rights to the tract which was leased in March 1974. A 4-year modified in situ (MIS) demonstration program was completed<br />

at the end of 1981. The program burned two successful retorts. The first retort was 30 feet by 30 feet by 166 feet high and<br />

produced 1,907 barrels of shale oil. It burned between October and late December 1980. The second retort was 60 feet by 60 feet<br />

by 400 feet high and produced 24,790 barrels while burning from June through most of December 1981. Open pit mining-surface<br />

retorting development is still preferred, however, because of much greater resource recovery of 5 versus 2 billion barrels over the<br />

life of the project. Rio Blanco, however, could not develop the tract efficiently in this manner without additional federal land for<br />

disposal purposes and siting of processing facilities, so in August 1982, the company temporarily suspended operations on its<br />

federal tract after receiving a 5 year lease suspension from the United States Department of Interior. In August 1987, the suspen<br />

sion was renewed.<br />

2-32<br />

SYNTHETIC FUELS REPORT, JANUARY 1995

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!