Ikelic - Alliance Digital Repository
Ikelic - Alliance Digital Repository
Ikelic - Alliance Digital Repository
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
STATUS OF OIL SHALE PROJECTS (Underline denotes changes since June 1994)<br />
COMMERCIAL PROJECTS (Continued)<br />
The project, inactive for some time, began being reconsidered in 1990 by the equal partners. The viability of a 50,000 barrel<br />
per day plant that would process 60 million tonnes of shale is under examination. ONAREP expects the cost of development<br />
to be around $24-25 a barrel.<br />
Project Cost: $25 billion (estimated)<br />
- OCCIDENTAL MIS PROJECT Occidental<br />
Oil Shale, Inc. (S-20)<br />
Federal Oil Shale Lease Tract C-b, located in Rio Blanco County in the Piceance Creek Basin of northwestern Colorado, is<br />
managed by Occidental Oil Shale, Inc. A modified detailed development plan for a 57,000 barrels per modified day in situ<br />
plant was submitted in March 1977 and subsequently approved in April 1977. The EPA issued a conditional Prevention of Sig<br />
nificant Deterioration (PSD) permit in December 1977 which was amended in 1983.<br />
Project reassessment was announced in December 1981 in view of increased construction costs, reduced oil prices, and high in<br />
terest rates. The project sponsors applied to the United States Synthetic Fuels Corporation (SFC) under the third solicitation<br />
in January 1983 and the project was advanced into Phase II negotiations for financial assistance. On July 28, 1983 the SFC an<br />
nounced it had signed a letter of intent to provide up to $2.19 billion in loan and price guarantees to the project. However,<br />
Congress abolished the SFC on December 19, 1985 before any assistance could be awarded to the project.<br />
Three headframes-two concrete and one steel-have been erected. Four new structures were completed in 1982: control room.<br />
east and west airlocks, and mechanical/electrical rooms. The power substation on-tract became operational in 1982. The<br />
ventilation/escape, service, and production shafts were completed in Fall 1983. An interim monitoring program was approved<br />
in July 1982 to reflect the reduced level of activity.<br />
Water management in 1984 was achieved via direct discharge from on-tract holding ponds under the NPDES permit. Environ<br />
mental monitoring has continued since completion of the two-year baseline period (1974-1976).<br />
On April 1, 1987, the Bureau of Land Management, United States Department of the Interior, granted Cathedral Bluffs Shale<br />
Oil Company a suspension of operation and production for a minimum of five years. Meanwhile, of pumping the mine inflow<br />
water continued in order to keep the shaft from being flooded.<br />
Although Congress appropriated $8 million in fiscal year 1991, Occidental declined to proceed with the $225 million "proof-<br />
of-concept"<br />
modified in situ (MIS) demonstration project to be located on the C-b tract. In January 1991 Occidental an<br />
nounced its intention to shelve the demonstration project in an effort to reduce company debt. The announcement came only<br />
a month after the death of Oxy chairman, Armand Hammmer, a long-time supporter of oil shale.<br />
The project was to be a 1,200 barrel per day demonstration of the modified in situ (MIS) retorting process. Estimates indicate<br />
that there are more than 4.5 billion barrels of recoverable oil at the site. Also included in the project were plans for a<br />
33 megawatt oil shale fired powerplant to be built at the C-b tract. Such a powerplant would be the largest of its kind in the<br />
world.<br />
At the end of the demonstration period, Occidental had hoped to bring the plant up to full scale commercial production of<br />
2500 barrels of oil per day.<br />
Project Cost: $225 million for demonstration<br />
- PAMA OIL SHALE-FIRED POWERPLANT PROJECT PAMA (Energy Resources Development) Inc. (S-270)<br />
PAMA, an organization founded by several major Israeli corporations with the support of the government, has completed ex<br />
tensive studies, lasting several years, which show that the production of power by direct combustion of oil shale is technically<br />
feasible. Furthermore, the production of power still appears economically viable, despite the uncertainties regarding the<br />
economics of production of oil from shale.<br />
PAMA has, therefore begun a direct shale-fired demonstration program. A demo plant has been built that is in fact a commer<br />
cial plant, co-producing electricity to the grid and low pressure steam for process application at a factory adjacent to the Rotem<br />
oil shale deposit. The oil-shale-fired boiler, supplied by Ahlstrom, Finland, is based on a circulating fluid bed technology.<br />
The 41 megawatt plant is a cogeneration unit that delivers 50 tons per hour of steam at high pressure. Low-pressure steam is<br />
sold to process application in a chemical plant, and electricity produced in a back-pressure turbine is sold to the grid. Commis<br />
sioning was begun in August 1989 and oil shale firing began in October. Process steam sales began in November 1989 and<br />
electricity production started in February, 1990.<br />
PAMA and Israel Electric (the sole utility of Israel) have also embarked on a project to build a full scale oil shale-fired com<br />
mercial powerplant. The first 75 megawatt unit is scheduled to go into operation in 1999.<br />
2-29<br />
SYNTHETIC FUELS REPORT, JANUARY 1995