Ikelic - Alliance Digital Repository
Ikelic - Alliance Digital Repository
Ikelic - Alliance Digital Repository
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
OIL SANDS<br />
The company said the largest part of the produc<br />
tion Increase is likely to occur in 1997, after a<br />
scheduled maintenance turnaround. The expan<br />
sion plans are subject to regulatory approvals.<br />
####<br />
SYNCRUDE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT<br />
APPROVED<br />
In September 1992, Syncrude Canada Ltd.<br />
(Syncrude) applied to amend its existing Ap<br />
proval No. 5641 for the Mildred Lake Oil Sands<br />
Plant. In its application Syncrude sought ap<br />
proval for:<br />
- An<br />
- An<br />
- An<br />
- Conceptual<br />
increase in Its current Synthetic<br />
Crude Oil (SCO) production limit from<br />
10.0 to 12.6 million cubic meters per year<br />
(m3/yr)<br />
extension, to December 31, 1997, of<br />
the lapse date for an approval to expand<br />
the plant to produce an additional<br />
5.0 million m3/yr of SCO<br />
extension of its approval expiration<br />
date from December 31, 2018 to<br />
December 31 , 2025<br />
The processing of bitumen from off-lease<br />
sources at its Mildred Lake facility and<br />
for shipping of bitumen to other process<br />
ing facilities<br />
mining, lease development,<br />
and reclamation plans, including fine tail<br />
Background<br />
ings reclamation<br />
The Syncrude project was first approved by the<br />
Energy<br />
Board)<br />
Resources Conservation Board (the<br />
in 1968 and commenced production in<br />
1977. The project comprises an open-pit mine<br />
utilizing draglines, bucketwheel reclaimers and<br />
conveyers to transport bituminous sands to an<br />
3-2<br />
extraction plant where the bitumen is separated<br />
from the sand using a modified hot water<br />
process. Wastes from the extraction plant, which<br />
include coarse sand, fine tailings and water, are<br />
currently directed to two large tailings sites for<br />
temporary<br />
storage. The produced bitumen is<br />
hydrocrack-<br />
upgraded to SCO using fluid coking,<br />
ing and hydrotreating processes. Byproduct sul<br />
fur and petroleum coke are also produced.<br />
The Syncrude facility currently<br />
produce up<br />
1988,<br />
has approval to<br />
to 10.0 million m3/yr of SCO. In<br />
approval was granted to add facilities to<br />
produce an additional 5.0 million cubic meters of<br />
SCO annually. The approval stipulated that ex<br />
pansion was to commence by the end of 1992.<br />
Interim amendments to the lapse date were<br />
granted in both 1992 and 1993. These interim<br />
amendments also approved increases in the an<br />
nual SCO production limit and authorized<br />
Syncrude to process off-lease bitumen in the<br />
1992 and 1993 calendar years.<br />
The 1987 Expansion Project application was<br />
reviewed through a consultative process which<br />
included representatives of Syncrude, the Fort<br />
McKay First Nation, and various regulatory<br />
agencies. This group, which became known as<br />
the Syncrude Expansion Review Group or SERG,<br />
was able to address the issues and concerns of<br />
the Fort McKay First Nation without the need for<br />
a public hearing process.<br />
A somewhat different approach was used by<br />
Syncrude during the preparation of this applica<br />
tion. Syncrude identified key stakeholder groups<br />
with which it intended to individually consult in<br />
order to identify and, if possible, address areas of<br />
concern. The key stakeholder groups identified<br />
were: the Fort McKay First Nation, the City of<br />
Fort McMurray, and various environmental as<br />
sociations. In order to simplify Its dealing with<br />
the environmental associations, Syncrude ap<br />
proached the Alberta Environmental Network and<br />
asked it to set up a committee of interested or<br />
ganizations. The Syncrude Environmental As<br />
sessment Coalition (SEAC) was formed as a<br />
result. Separate consultation processes were in<br />
itiated with each of these three stakeholder<br />
THE SYNTHETIC FUELS REPORT, JANUARY 1995