03.04.2013 Views

Numismata hellenica: a catalogue of Greek coins; with notes, a map ...

Numismata hellenica: a catalogue of Greek coins; with notes, a map ...

Numismata hellenica: a catalogue of Greek coins; with notes, a map ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

22<br />

Metal Size Weight<br />

N<br />

M<br />

3+ 132-7<br />

272-7<br />

EUROPEAN GREECE.<br />

may attribute the inelegance <strong>of</strong> design and the coarseness <strong>of</strong> execution <strong>of</strong> the Athenian tetradrachmon,<br />

compared <strong>with</strong> many other <strong>Greek</strong> <strong>coins</strong> <strong>of</strong> similar value, as any alteration in its appearance<br />

might have damaged its credit. One very remarkable change, however, did take place, when the<br />

thick tetradrachmon, in which there had been no difference <strong>of</strong> form or type since the time <strong>of</strong> Solon,<br />

and the simplicity <strong>of</strong> which had perhaps rendered it liable to forgery, was spread into a much wider<br />

surface, for the sake apparently <strong>of</strong> giving room for the names, or for initial portions <strong>of</strong> the names, <strong>of</strong><br />

two, or more commonly, three magistrates, together <strong>with</strong> one or more symbols. The drachma and<br />

half drachma underwent a similar change, but these pieces are now extremely rare, compared <strong>with</strong><br />

those <strong>of</strong> the old mode. This reform in the Athenian coinage took place probably about the same<br />

time that a similar change occurred in the Macedonian mint. The great success <strong>of</strong> Philip, in<br />

working the Thracian mines <strong>of</strong> gold and silver, having made the Macedonian silver money a rival to<br />

that <strong>of</strong> Athens in the commercial world, it became necessary to the Athenians to imitate Alexander<br />

the Great in improving the appearance and enlarging the sui-face <strong>of</strong> the tetradrachmon. It is<br />

observable, that none <strong>of</strong> the broad Athenian pieces <strong>of</strong> that denomination have any appearance in<br />

their style or letters <strong>of</strong> an age older than that <strong>of</strong> Alexander, except in the legend AeE, where the<br />

Epsilon was preserved until the time <strong>of</strong> the Roman empire. In enlarging the tetradrachmon,<br />

however, the Athenians degraded the Solonian standard <strong>of</strong> the drachma, although it had been<br />

confirmed<br />

B. c. 403.<br />

at the time <strong>of</strong> the reforms which accompanied or followed the Archonship <strong>of</strong> Eucleides,<br />

On examining the table <strong>of</strong> weights in the Hunter Collection, in which there are more<br />

than 100 tetradrachma, we may observe, that all the old tetradrachma weigh more than 260 grains<br />

or more than C5 grains to the drachma on an average, and that all the broad or later tetradrachma<br />

are below 260. From Strabo we leam that the Attic mines had failed in his time, but that there<br />

were still workers who extracted some silver from the old imperfectly smelted scoriie. We may<br />

infer, therefore, that the silver coinage <strong>of</strong> Athens, uiJess for domestic use, and in small quantities,<br />

had ceased before the time <strong>of</strong> Augustus, having lasted more than seven centuries, and six from the<br />

time <strong>of</strong> Solon. No Athenian <strong>coins</strong> have yet been published <strong>of</strong> a date earlier than that <strong>of</strong> Solon,<br />

before whose time, the drachma was nearly, if not exactly, <strong>of</strong> the same weight as the vaxtla IpajQiii,<br />

or Eginetan drachma, bearing to the Attic the proportion <strong>of</strong> about ten to seven.<br />

The Athenian gold coinage was very limited, and only one denomination is known— the didrachmon<br />

or stater. The striking <strong>of</strong> this money, if we may judge by its weight, style, and name, commenced<br />

likewise in the reign <strong>of</strong> Alexander. Pericles, in his address to the Athenians, speaks only <strong>of</strong> gold in<br />

bullion, and <strong>of</strong> that which formed part <strong>of</strong> the statue by Phidias in the Parthenon ; from several<br />

passages in Lysias and Demosthenes it is evident that in their time Darics and Cyzicenes were<br />

common as the circulating medium in gold, and they make no allusion to any Athenian coin <strong>of</strong> the<br />

same kind.<br />

The time <strong>of</strong> the introduction <strong>of</strong> copper money is more uncertain. The first attempt to introduce<br />

it was unsuccessful (conf. Aristoph. Ran. v. 737- Eccles. v. 810), which is not surprising, the<br />

Athenian copper <strong>coins</strong> having been, unlike those <strong>of</strong> Syracuse, mere tokens, worth only a small<br />

portion <strong>of</strong> their nominal value,<br />

while the minutest subdivision <strong>of</strong> the obolus in silver maintained<br />

its just weight. But probably the introduction <strong>of</strong> copper into Athenian circulation occurred not<br />

long after the first attempt. It is natui-al to believe, that after the introduction <strong>of</strong> a copper coinage,<br />

the subdivisions <strong>of</strong> the obolus, which were inconveniently small, would cease to be struck ; and<br />

accordingly we may remark, that all the extant examples <strong>of</strong> those subdivisions are <strong>of</strong> an archaic<br />

character. From some fragments <strong>of</strong> the comic poet Philemon, who lived about 300 B.C., it is<br />

evident that in his time the xaXicois <strong>of</strong> eight to the obolus was in common circulation.<br />

In regard to pieces so small and so nearly <strong>of</strong> the same weight as were some <strong>of</strong> the subdivisions <strong>of</strong><br />

the drachma and obolus, it was evidently convenient to afford the means <strong>of</strong> distinguishing them from<br />

one another by their types as well as their weight; and, accordingly, it is found that while the ordi-<br />

nary types <strong>of</strong> the old tetradrachmon, didrachmon, and drachma, — namely, the head <strong>of</strong> Pallas and the<br />

owl, both turned to the —are right, preserved on the obolus and half-obolus, the other denomina-<br />

tions, namely, the pentobolon, the tetrobolon, the triobolon, the diobolon, the obolus and a half, the<br />

three fourths <strong>of</strong> the obolus, and the one fourth <strong>of</strong> the obolus, had each its peculiar type, which was<br />

almost invariable. Examples occur <strong>of</strong> a variation <strong>of</strong> type in the drachma, half-drachma, and<br />

quarter-drachma, but they are extremely rare.<br />

Head <strong>of</strong> Pallas to r. ft. Owl to r. looking adv. behind, crescent and two leaves <strong>of</strong><br />

olive on a stem ; in field to r., A0E and cista mystica. — Electrotype from<br />

the B. M.<br />

Head <strong>of</strong> Pallas to r. <strong>with</strong> a large round earring. Helmet fitting close, and <strong>with</strong>out<br />

ornament, but <strong>with</strong> decorated crest and covering the neck ; eye large and round ;<br />

hair in formal ringlets round the forehead ; nose and chin pointed, ft. AOE-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!