03.04.2013 Views

Numismata hellenica: a catalogue of Greek coins; with notes, a map ...

Numismata hellenica: a catalogue of Greek coins; with notes, a map ...

Numismata hellenica: a catalogue of Greek coins; with notes, a map ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

21<br />

NOTE ON THE WEIGHTS OF GREEK COINS.<br />

both in gold and silver, on one side the heads <strong>of</strong> a bull and gaping lion opposed to each other ', and on the reverse a<br />

rude incuse. These, therefore, were the money <strong>of</strong> the Lydian kingdom, to which Cyrus put an end by the capture<br />

<strong>of</strong> Croesus and Sardes in b.c. 548. As Darius, son <strong>of</strong> Hystaspes, prided himself on having established the coinage <strong>of</strong><br />

and silver derive<br />

money in Persia ", we may be assured it is from him that the extant <strong>coins</strong> <strong>of</strong> ancient Persia in gold<br />

their name. Their resemblance to those <strong>of</strong> Lydia in form, in style, and particularly in the weight <strong>of</strong> the principal silver<br />

coin, which in both coinages, when perfect, weighed about 84 grains troy ', leaves no question as to the Persian<br />

coinage being an imitation <strong>of</strong> the Lydian. It was the case <strong>of</strong> a conqueror adopting the arts <strong>of</strong> the conquered. The<br />

only difference is in the weight <strong>of</strong> the gold Daric, which is three or four grains heavier than the Lydian gold coin, the<br />

latter weighing about 125 grains. This weight, as I before observed, seems to have been introduced into Lydia from<br />

the country whence she derived arts and letters, namely, Phoenicia, where, as well as in Judea, it appears that a unity<br />

<strong>of</strong> weight existed, named Shekel, from Shakal, to weigh, that is to say, it was " the weight," kot' i^oxvv. And this<br />

weight appears to have been the same as the Egyptian unit <strong>of</strong> weight, for we learn from Horapollo that the Moi/(ic,<br />

or unit, which they held to be the basis <strong>of</strong> all numeration, was equal to two drachmae *; and Sidpaxfov is employed<br />

synonymously <strong>with</strong> aUXog for the Hebrew word shekel by the <strong>Greek</strong> Septuagint, consequently, the shekel and the<br />

didrachmon were <strong>of</strong> the same weight. I am aware that some learned commentators are <strong>of</strong> opinion that the trans-<br />

lators here meant a didrachmon <strong>of</strong> the Grseco- Egyptian scale, which weighed about 1 10 grains ; but it is<br />

hardly<br />

credible that diSpaxttov should have been thus employed <strong>with</strong>out any distinguishing epithet, at a time when the Ptolemaic<br />

scale was yet <strong>of</strong> recent origin, the word didrachmon, on the other hand, having for ages been applied to a silver<br />

<strong>of</strong> all cities which follow the Attic or Corinthian standard, as well as in<br />

money, <strong>of</strong> about 130 grains, in the currency<br />

the silver money <strong>of</strong> Alexander the Great and his successors. In all these currencies, as well as in those <strong>of</strong> Lydia and<br />

Persia, the stater was an Attic didrachmon, or, at least, <strong>with</strong> no greater difference <strong>of</strong> standard than occurs among<br />

modern nations using a denomination <strong>of</strong> weight or measure common to all ; and hence the word Bi^paxi^ov was at<br />

length employed as a measure <strong>of</strong> weight, <strong>with</strong>out any reference to its origin in the Attic drachma. Thus we find the<br />

drachma <strong>of</strong> gold described as equivalent to ten didrachma ', and the half-shekel <strong>of</strong> the Pentateuch translated by the<br />

Septuagint to iJnt(Tv tov SiSpaxi^ov. There can be little doubt, therefore, that the Attic, and not the Grseco-Egyptian<br />

didrachmon, was intended by them.<br />

The Egyptian Monas, as the parent <strong>of</strong> all numeration (ttovtoc api9^oS yiveaii), was appropriately represented by<br />

the same hieroglyphic as " Mother," namely, the vulture, and it partook <strong>of</strong> the sanctity <strong>of</strong> that peculiarly sacred<br />

bird. Hence, probably, it happened that in the <strong>Greek</strong> translation made in Egypt, the Shekel-ha-kodesh, or Shekel<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Sanctuary, was not rendered aUXog or liSpaxfov tov ayiov, but mpax/tov to iiytov,<br />

as if the translators had in<br />

mind the sanctity <strong>of</strong> the monas, as well as its identity <strong>with</strong> the Mosaic shekel. And thus it appears highly probable,<br />

that Moses, together <strong>with</strong> the arts and customs <strong>of</strong> Egypt, brought the monas <strong>with</strong> him into the desert, and deposited<br />

it in the sanctuary <strong>of</strong> the Tabernacle, to remain in the custody <strong>of</strong> the priests, and to serve as a standard for ever.<br />

The monas had, long perhaps before the time <strong>of</strong> the Exodus, established itself in Phoenicia, and had there taken the<br />

name <strong>of</strong> " the shekel " about the same time, when the alphabet was invented by an improvement upon Egyptian<br />

hieroglyphics.<br />

In the second book <strong>of</strong> Samuel (ii. 14. 26) the shekel is called A akX<strong>of</strong> 6 /SaaiXiicos : it was probably deposited in<br />

the sanctuary <strong>of</strong> the Temple <strong>of</strong> Solomon.<br />

In this question, we must be careful to distinguish between the Mosaic shekel (the weight) and the extant Jewish<br />

silver money (i/d/iitr/ja 'E/3poiuv), equally called Shekel, as appears by the words " Shekel Israel," inscribed upon it.<br />

That the Mosaic shekel was nothing more than a weight, is evident from numerous passages in the Old Testament.<br />

It is a mistake to suppose that Genesis (xxiii. 16) proves the existence <strong>of</strong> money at that time, because our version<br />

makes mention <strong>of</strong> "money current <strong>with</strong> the merchant;" there is no word corresponding to " money" in the original,<br />

and in the Septuagint the words imply only " four hundred shekels <strong>of</strong> good silver, such as is approved <strong>of</strong> by, or is<br />

current among, merchants *." It is to be observed that the half-shekel <strong>of</strong> silver, paid to the Lord by every male <strong>of</strong><br />

the children <strong>of</strong> Israel as a ransom for his soul ', had nothing in common <strong>with</strong> the tribute paid by the Jews to the<br />

' The lion was an accompaniment and a symbol <strong>of</strong> the goddess MA, or Cybele, whose temple at Sardes was one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

most magnificent in Asia. The bull represented probably the river Pactolus.<br />

' Herod, iv. 166.<br />

'<br />

This coin is accurately described by Xenophon (Anab. i. 5, 6) as equal to 7J Attic oboli, 'O li wiyXoc cvvaTai ivra<br />

o/3o\o4c Koi »;fiio|3oXiov. The obolus <strong>of</strong> full weight was 11-25 grains (Europe, p. 21), 1 1-25 x 75 = 84-375 84 is found to be<br />

;<br />

about the weight <strong>of</strong> the most perfect silver Darics. As this accords neither <strong>with</strong> the shekel <strong>of</strong> the Septuagint, equal to an<br />

Attic didrachmon, nor <strong>with</strong> the 'E/3pai

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!