06.04.2013 Views

Chapter I Intro & Objectives - SPREP

Chapter I Intro & Objectives - SPREP

Chapter I Intro & Objectives - SPREP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PHOENIX ISLANDS PROTECTED AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN<br />

<strong>Chapter</strong> III. Background, 2. Human Activities<br />

Draft 1 March 2007<br />

By 1880, the Pacific Island Company, a British firm) worked the island for guano (Pompey<br />

1972c). According to Garnett (1983a), the Pacific Islands Co., Ltd. applied for a license to<br />

work McKean, but the license was never granted. McKean was therefore never used by a<br />

British firm.<br />

By the mid-1880s, John T. Arundel & Company held British leases for untended American<br />

guano islands (Skaggs 1994) including: Birnie, Abariringa (Canton), Enderbury, Nikumaroro<br />

(Gardner), Orona (Hull), McKeans, Rawaki (Phoenix), and Manra (Sydney). All of these had<br />

been claimed by U.S. Guano, but none had been worked by them.<br />

John T. Arundel Co. did not use or develop McKean (Bryan 1941 and 1942). They reported<br />

no guano left on McKean.<br />

NIKUMARORO (GARDNER)<br />

On February 12, 1869, the U.S. Guano Company filed a claim to Nikumaroro (Gardner) and<br />

received bond number 9, dated February 8, 1860 (Skaggs 1994). All of the Phoenix Islands,<br />

except Orona (Hull) were bonded to the American Guano Company, or its subsidiary, the<br />

Phoenix Guano Company (Maude 1952 and 1968).<br />

Nikumaroro (Kemins) was claimed by Americans under the U.S. Guano Act of 1856 (Bryan<br />

1941 and 1942). This was probably to C.A. Williams (Garnett 1983a). However, there was<br />

no exploitation or development on the island.<br />

There was no record of guano being dug on Nikumaroro (see also Garnett 1983a).<br />

By the mid-1880s, John T. Arundel & Company held British leases for untended American<br />

guano islands (Skaggs 1994) including: Birnie, Abariringa (Canton), Enderbury, Nikumaroro<br />

(Gardner), Orona (Hull), McKeans, Rawaki (Phoenix), and Manra (Sydney). All of these had<br />

been claimed by U.S. Guano, but none had been worked by them.<br />

ORONA (HULL)<br />

There was some confusion regarding the location of Orona (Hull) (Bryan 1941 and 1942).<br />

This may have lead to Orona (Hull) not being claimed by American guano diggers as Manra<br />

(Sydney) and Nikumaroro (Gardner).<br />

Orona (Hull) was the only Phoenix Island never bonded to the American Guano Company, or<br />

its subsidiary, the Phoenix Guano Company (Maude 1952 and 1968; see also Skaggs 1994;<br />

Garnett 1983a). However, it was mined by the Phoenix Guano Company (Skaggs 1994).<br />

The positions of Abariringa (Mary, Swallow, or Canton), Enderbury, Birnie, Rawaki<br />

(Phoenix), McKean, and Orona (Hall) were published in Anon. (1871). In 1871, sailing<br />

directions for the Phoenix Islands were published (Hempstead 1871). These included:<br />

Abariringa (Mary, Swallow, or Canton), Birnie, Enderbury, McKean (Wilkes), Orona (Halls),<br />

and Rawaki (Phoenix).<br />

39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!