06.04.2013 Views

Chapter I Intro & Objectives - SPREP

Chapter I Intro & Objectives - SPREP

Chapter I Intro & Objectives - SPREP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PHOENIX ISLANDS PROTECTED AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN<br />

<strong>Chapter</strong> III. Background, 1. Physical Setting of the Islands<br />

Draft 1 March 2007<br />

thickness (ULT) estimates improved through iterations and were eventually similar to true<br />

upper layer thickness readings for the time series examined.<br />

Tides – Spring tide was about 1.2 m (4 ft) (Hydrographic Office 1916). Tidal variation was<br />

1.5 to 1.8 m (5 to 6 ft) during the full moon (Bunker 1951; ranged 1 m (3.3 ft) and spring<br />

range was 1.2 m (4 ft) according to McIntire 1960). At other times it was 0.6 m (2 ft)<br />

(Bunker 1951). Mean high-water interval was exactly 5 hours (McIntire 1960). McIntire<br />

(1960) noted that slack tide was frequently only 10 minutes.<br />

Groves (1956) reported that sea-level observations on Abariringa (Canton) showed regular<br />

four-day oscillations that were related to equatorial waves in the easterly winds over the<br />

island. Similar results were observed on Ocean Island. Tide gages on Butaritari and Tarawa<br />

did not show such a regular record.<br />

The tidal station at Abariringa (Canton) recorded unaccountable change in sea levels of 15 to<br />

18 cm (6 or 7 inches) at 3.8 day intervals (Wiens 1962).<br />

Using sea level records of various central Pacific islands, including Abariringa (Canton),<br />

Wunsch and Gill (1976) calculated the spectral energy density and demonstrated that there<br />

were higher energy levels associated with inertia-gravity wave frequencies. In Abariringa<br />

(Canton), there was a 4 day oscillation that dominated the energy spectrum. This was not<br />

found in higher latitudes. Wunsch and Gill (1976) compared the wind and sea level data and<br />

found them to be statistically significantly, particularly at the 0.25 day -1 (4 day oscillation).<br />

They suggested that the oscillation was due to oceanic resonance rather than atmospheric<br />

resonance since oceanic resonance had higher energy.<br />

Henderson et al (1978) installed tidal monitors in Abariringa’s (Canton’s) lagoon to monitor<br />

and compare ocean and lagoonal tides. Results were similar. Drift cards and dye tracks were<br />

also used to study Abariringa’s (Canton’s) lagoon. Wind-driven cards moved down-wind,<br />

but in a complicated pattern. Some cards became entrained in small eddies.<br />

Sea-level data from Abariringa (Canton) indicated that there was an anomalous rise in sea<br />

level during the latter half of the 1965 El Niño year (Busalacchi et al 1983). There were great<br />

difficulties in interpreting sea-level data at Abariringa (Canton) because of the interplay<br />

between equatorially trapped Kelvin waves and long Rossby waves.<br />

Khandekar et al (2005) reported that for 28 years there was no detectable change in sea level<br />

on Abariringa (Kanton). This example was provided in the global warming debate context.<br />

Waves/Swells - Banner and Banner (1964) noted that strong winds and surf at times rendered<br />

collection on the outer side of the ocean reef too hazardous on Abariringa (Canton).<br />

Environmental Data Services (1966) reported that at long intervals high sea swells occurred<br />

several times in the past. An event was recorded in January 1958 when swells 4.6 to 6.1 m<br />

(15 to 20 ft) high lasted over a period of several days.<br />

Gilbert (2000) examined equatorial inertia-gravity waves for various locations in the central<br />

Pacific, including Abariringa (Kanton). Christmas, Abariringa (Kanton), and Tarawa had<br />

significant peaks at frequencies corresponding to first and second meridional mode inertia-<br />

22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!