09.04.2013 Views

Turks and Caicos Islands

Turks and Caicos Islands

Turks and Caicos Islands

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Note: Savings costs of energy efficiency measures (US $/kWh) are based on a 10% discount rate. Generation costs <strong>and</strong><br />

tariffs are based on diesel prices of US $3/gallon.<br />

Figure 5.2.2: Viability of energy efficiency technologies in <strong>Turks</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Caicos</strong><br />

(Source: Castalia, 2011)<br />

Based on its review of the financial viability of energy-efficiency, Castalia (2011: 53-54) concludes that: all<br />

lighting technologies for residential, commercial <strong>and</strong> industrial customers are viable; magnetic induction<br />

lights are a viable option for street lighting; power monitors are a strong awareness tool for saving<br />

electricity through behavioural change (savings of 10%); all mechanical technologies, such as premium<br />

efficiency motors, variable frequency drives <strong>and</strong> efficient chillers are viable, particularly for industrial<br />

customers <strong>and</strong> hotels; all air conditioning technologies are highly viable, especially window systems for<br />

residential use; LCD computer monitors are viable, but already have high uptake; refrigeration technologies<br />

can save customers money, but only residential ones are economically viable.<br />

The assessment of renewable energy technologies that are economically viable found five that may be<br />

economically viable for both utilities. These are: l<strong>and</strong>fill gas to energy on a large scale, operated<br />

commercially (US $0.08 per kWh); solar water heaters on a small <strong>and</strong> commercial scale for homes <strong>and</strong><br />

businesses (US $0.12 <strong>and</strong> US $0.13 per kWh, respectively); wind (‘Class 1’ <strong>and</strong> lowerable/tiltable turbines),<br />

on a large scale operated commercially (US $0.12 <strong>and</strong> US $0.21 per kWh, respectively); waste to energy on<br />

a large scale operated commercially (US $0.12 per kWh 4 ); <strong>and</strong> seawater air-conditioning, on a large scale<br />

operated commercially (US $0.23 per kWh) (Castalia, 2011).<br />

One additional technology would also be economically viable in TCU‘s service area. That is concentrated<br />

solar power (parabolic trough), on a large scale operated commercially (US $0.26 per kWh), although if TCU<br />

were to switch from high-speed diesel plants to higher-efficiency medium speed diesel plants, the<br />

assessment would be similar to the one for PPC. Solar PV on a commercial <strong>and</strong> small scale <strong>and</strong> distributed<br />

wind turbines (10 kW) are commercially but not economically viable. Overall, the potential to use<br />

renewable energy in the isl<strong>and</strong>s is promising, <strong>and</strong> should be pursued on economic grounds alone.<br />

4 This cost is based on TCI-specific data, but looks low compared to similar plants <strong>and</strong> therefore warrants further investigation<br />

(Castalia, 2011).<br />

117

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!