09.04.2013 Views

Turks and Caicos Islands

Turks and Caicos Islands

Turks and Caicos Islands

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 5.8.13: Source of food supply<br />

Source of Food Male-Headed<br />

Households<br />

149<br />

Female-Headed<br />

Households<br />

Total<br />

Grown by Family 4 12.9% 2 6.5% 6 19.4%<br />

Grocery store / Super market 19 61.3% 12 38.7% 31 100.0%<br />

Open air / Traditional market 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%<br />

Community Shops 3 9.7% 5 16.1% 8 25.8%<br />

Barter 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%<br />

Other 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%<br />

When asked about the adequacy of the household food supply, majority of the sample indicated having an<br />

adequate supply of food throughout the year. Conversely, eight respondents indicated otherwise (see Table<br />

5.8.14). The relatively higher percentage of male-headed households which have an inadequate food<br />

supply may correspond with the higher percentage of male headed households in lower income brackets<br />

compared to female-headed households (see Figure 5.8.3), <strong>and</strong> further highlights the inability of these<br />

households to acquire the resources need to sustain themselves. Given the small sample size a definitive<br />

conclusion cannot be made in regards to gender <strong>and</strong> food adequacy, however, more research in this area<br />

could provide further insights.<br />

Adequacy of<br />

Food Supply<br />

Table 5.8.14: Adequacy of food supply<br />

Male-Headed<br />

Households<br />

Female-Headed<br />

Households<br />

Total<br />

(% of sample)<br />

Yes 13 41.9% 10 32.3% 23 74.2%<br />

No 6 19.4% 2 6.5% 8 25.8%<br />

5.8.5. Financial Security <strong>and</strong> Social Protection<br />

Financial support networks are relatively strong for some households, with at least a quarter of the<br />

respondents received financial support from relatives or family friends <strong>and</strong> 9.7% received financial support<br />

from charitable organizations. Religious organisations also play an important role in that 19.4% of<br />

respondents indicated receiving support. Respondents also received support from government <strong>and</strong> other<br />

sources (see Table 5.8.15).<br />

Sources of Support<br />

Table 5.8.15: Distribution by financial responsibility for house (receive support)<br />

Male<br />

Respondent<br />

Male Headed Female Headed<br />

Female<br />

Respondent<br />

Male<br />

Respondent<br />

Female<br />

Respondent<br />

Sample<br />

Relative 4 22.2% 1 100.0% NA NA 3 25.0% 8 25.8%<br />

Family Friend 5 27.8% 1 100.0% NA NA 2 16.7% 8 25.8%<br />

Religious Organisation 2 11.1% 1 100.0% NA NA 3 25.0% 6 19.4%<br />

Charitable Organisation 2 11.1% 1 100.0% NA NA 0 0.0% 3 9.7%<br />

Government 1 5.6% 0 0.0% NA NA 0 0.0% 1 3.2%<br />

Other 2 11.1% 0 0.0% NA NA 0 0.0% 2 6.5%

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!