12.08.2013 Views

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

“They find ways in which they attempt to neutralise or minimise the constraints and<br />

restraints imposed upon them. They invent and develop at some point certain<br />

idiosyncrasies – that is to say, “personality” traits – which they use to legitimately<br />

excuse themselves fromdoingsuch work”. (Vass 1990:118).<br />

A common thread of discontent running through many community service schemes<br />

whatever the level of commitment or dissociation is the complaint by offenders that the<br />

work performed is not useful or has no tangible reward either for the offender or the<br />

community. This criticism is especially made when offenders are working in groups and<br />

in projects not immediately recognised in their minds with community. Besides the<br />

elements of avoidance by offenders which were observed by Vass (1984) in situ, the<br />

primary form of dissociation or withdrawal of consent to participate in community service<br />

is the phenomenon of absenteeism (McWilliams and Murphy1980; Young 1979; and Vass<br />

1990). Absenteeism is the failure to attend work without a reasonable excuse. Failure to<br />

attend for community service work without an acceptable explanation is a breach of the<br />

community service order. Absenteeism is the ultimate dissociation by the offender from<br />

the communityservice order.<br />

While consent is a necessaryprecondition to the making of a communityservice order, the<br />

maintenance of that consent on the part of the offender is required to complete the order<br />

in its entirety. If the offender fails to attend without reasonable cause at a community<br />

service scheme it may be inferred that the consent originally offered is either withdrawn<br />

conditionally or absolutely. This presents a major challenge to the probation officer<br />

supervising such a scheme. In this regardVass foundas follows:<br />

“Absenteeism is not only an endemic feature of community service which<br />

occasionally may run at an average rate of one quarter of all attendances per month,<br />

but also many– as much as half – of those absences are due to reasons consideredas<br />

99

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!