12.08.2013 Views

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The offender was presented in the replies as one who was disposed to help him/herself<br />

while offering an early plea of guilty, by ensuring continuity of employment while not<br />

entering into custody or by acquiring the habits of punctuality and compliance in the<br />

performance of a communityservice order where the offender maybe unemployed.<br />

Risk<br />

Generally, the judges were inclined to use community service as a sanction where the risk<br />

of re-offending was low. In the study, the judges disclosed that they apply filters in the<br />

selection of offenders for community service. The process of selection of suitable<br />

candidates for community service turns on the fulcrum of considerations of risk to the<br />

public or specific victims and ultimately the seriousness of the offence and the offenders’<br />

antecedent behaviours.<br />

The offences which are deemedto be generallyunsuitable for communityservice andmore<br />

deserving of a custodial sentence tend to fall into a category where imprisonment is<br />

perceived to be the most appropriate disposition. In the responses given bythe judges, the<br />

issues of a proportionate sentence or desert and risk containment compete for supremacy<br />

in the formulation of the sentence. A certain selectivity of shallow end, non serious<br />

offenders for community service is suggested in these responses. The residual offenders<br />

deemed unsuitable by reference to their class of offences seem destined not to be diverted<br />

away from the prison. Notwithstanding the availability of community service as a<br />

diversionary tool of sentencing, those deserving of a prison sentence will, generally<br />

speaking, receive a prison sentence. The judges seemed to be averse to incorporating the<br />

element of risk into a community service order. Rather, if such risk was identified the<br />

balance wouldgenerallytip in favour of a custodial sentence.<br />

One judge spoke of the alienation between the offender and society in general and the<br />

difficulties in engagingthe offender meaningfullyin anynon custodial sanction:<br />

“A lot of these young fellows are totally, I won’t say excluded from society, but they haven’t got a<br />

job. They never got on at school and they associated with like-minded (individuals) as themselves<br />

andthis maybe puts theminto some different places.”A5J1CC<br />

When pressed what confidence he had that the Probation Service would carry out the<br />

courts wishes or orders in the supervision of such offenders he replied:<br />

178

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!