12.08.2013 Views

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

character of the voluntary sector in England and Wales was transformed by the advent of<br />

the welfare state, which transformation commenced in the late 1940s. Services which<br />

hitherto were in part provided by both church and lay volunteers, motivated by a spirit of<br />

philanthropyin the areas of health and education, were displaced byprofessional state paid<br />

service providers (Crossman 1973: 266). Increasingly the voluntary sector realigned its<br />

position and its relationship with the state sector by identifying gaps in the provision of<br />

those services and in identifying newly emerging needs which were not considered<br />

appropriate within the broadthrust of the welfare state function (Beveridge1948: 266-302).<br />

Indeed Lady Wootton recognised that the idea of voluntary service had come into fresh<br />

prominence with the emergence of such organisations (Home Office 1970:par 32).<br />

The most appealing features of community service for the Wootton Committee were the<br />

opportunity for offenders to engage in constructive activity by personal service to the<br />

community and the possibility which this might afford by way of changed outlook by the<br />

offender (Pease 1980; Home Office 1970).<br />

In light of the recommendations of the Advisory Council on the Penal System (Wootton<br />

Report), the Home Office Working Group was established to report on the practical issues<br />

raised by a scheme of community service by offenders and what form of statutory<br />

arrangement would be best suited to give effect to it (Home Office Working Group 1971).<br />

In considering the proposals of the Wootton Committee the Working Group had to<br />

address certain practical matters such as the administrative aspects of any new scheme of<br />

penalty unrelated to the processing and containment of prisoners and the collection of<br />

fines. They endorsed the Probation Service as the most appropriate agency to administer<br />

the scheme as recommendedbythe Wootton Committee.<br />

The Group specifically recommended that community service was such a new and<br />

undeveloped concept, it should be presented in legislation as a stand alone order and<br />

should not be combined with any other dispositions such as a fine or a probation order<br />

(Pease 1980).<br />

46

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!